Treatment of myofascial trigger points in common shoulder disorders by physical therapy: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN75722066]

Background  

Shoulder disorders are a common health problem in western societies. Several treatment protocols have been developed for the clinical management of persons with shoulder pain. However available evidence does not support any protocol as being superior over others. Systematic reviews provide some evidence that certain physical therapy interventions (i.e. supervised exercises and mobilisation) are effective in particular shoulder disorders (i.e. rotator cuff disorders, mixed shoulder disorders and adhesive capsulitis), but there is an ongoing need for high quality trials of physical therapy interventions. Usually, physical therapy consists of active exercises intended to strengthen the shoulder muscles as stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint or perform mobilisations to improve restricted mobility of the glenohumeral or adjacent joints (shoulder girdle). It is generally accepted that a-traumatic shoulder problems are the result of impingement of the subacromial structures, such as the bursa or rotator cuff tendons. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in shoulder muscles may also lead to a complex of symptoms that are often seen in patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement or rotator cuff tendinopathy. Little is known about the treatment of MTrPs in patients with shoulder disorders.     

Dopaminergic involvement in locomotion elicited from the ventral pallidum/substantia innominata

Microinjection of the indirect GABAA antagonist, picrotoxin, or the mu opioid agonist, Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-NMe-Phe-Gly-ol (DAGO), into the ventral pallidum and substantia innominata (VP/SI) increases locomotor activity in rats. The VP/SI has direct and indirect projections to the region of the ventral mesencephalon containing dopamine perikarya, and to certain dopamine terminal fields, including the nucleus accumbens. Thus, it is possible that modulation of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system by pharmacological stimulation in the VP/SI may play a role in the locomotor stimulant response. It was shown that pretreatment with dopamine receptor antagonists, either peripherally or microinjected into the nucleus accumbens significantly attenuated the motor stimulant effect of DAGO or picrotoxin injection into the VP/SI. Injection of either picrotoxin or DAGO into the VP/SI increased the levels of dopamine metabolites in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex. Thus, the motor stimulant response following pharmacological stimulation of the VP/SI appears to be mediated by increased dopamine neurotransmission via feedback mechanisms to the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system.     

Olfactory Neuroblastoma and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Anterior Skull Base: Treatment Results at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Updated information on the pathologic characterization and treatment of olfactory neurobiastoma (ON) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) diseases is presented. A series of patients with ON or NEC was evaluated and retrospectively staged using the UCLA system. The parameters evaluated were symptoms, age, sex, risk factor assessment, stage of disease, treatment, and clinical outcome. The median follow-up was 3 years (range, 18 months to 23 years). The predominant therapy (63%) for ON was combined surgery and radiotherapy. Surgery alone or in combination with ancillary treatment was used in 58% of patients with NEC. For the most receat years of the study, patients with NEC have been treated successfully with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Seventy percent of the patients with ON and 75% of the patients with NEC were clinically free of disease during the defined follow-up period. Surgical therapy consisting of a craniofacial resection combined with postoperative radiotherapy has resulted in good local and long-term control of ON. Our experience indicates that combined chemoradiation is an appropriate therapeutic approach for NEC.