From medical history and biochemical tests to presymptomatic treatment in a large MEN 2A family*

Abstract. An extensive study was published in 1959 in the Netherlands on a large family, which initially attracted attention because of a family history of attacks of shaking. Clinical investigation revealed phaeochromocytomas in four family members. In 1975, the family was identified to be a MEN 2A family, and since then, the members were examined annually using measurement of catecholamine metabolites in 24-h excreted urine and C-cell stimulation tests. In 1993, the RET proto-oncogene on chromosome 10q11 was found to be associated with MEN 2A and a specific mutation in this gene was identified in the family. In this family, 32 MEN 2A patients were detected. Since screening started in 1975, no patient died of phaeochromocytoma; however, two patients died of metastasized medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) (mean age 46 years). Twelve patients were operated on for phaeochromocytoma, and 13 for MTC. The results of DNA-analysis revealed the failures of the biochemical tests to identify affected family members. Six disease gene carriers with normal C-cell stimulation test results appeared to have small multifocal MTCs. Two carriers with normal excretion levels of catecholamines had a small phaeochromocytoma. DNA-analysis enables the unambiguous diagnosis of MEN 2A gene carriership, allowing presymptomatic surgery for MTC.     

THE SENSITIVITY OF GROWTH HORMONE AND PROLACTIN SECRETION TO THE SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUE SMS 201–995 IN PATIENTS WITH PROLACTINOMAS AND ACROMEGALY

The somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 has recently been shown to be effective in suppressing GH secretion in most acromegalic patients. In the present study it was investigated whether PRL release in prolactinoma and acromegalic patients might also be sensitive to SMS 201-995 and whether co-secretion of PRL in acromegaly plays a role in determining the sensitivity of GH secretion to SMS 201-995. The s.c. administration of 50 micrograms SMS 201-995 did not affect high plasma PRL levels in four microprolactinoma patients. Therapy of one of these patients for 3 d with 50 micrograms three times a day also did not affect PRL levels. The single administration of 50 micrograms SMS 201-995 in 22 acromegalic patients lowered plasma GH levels for 2-6 h to less than 5 micrograms/l in 14 patients and to less than 50% of control values in 16 patients. In 18 of these 22 patients the immunohistochemical picture of the pituitary tumour was known. Eleven patients had pure GH-containing tumours and in seven patients there were mixed GH/PRL-containing tumours. In two of these latter patients there was evidence for GH and PRL being secreted by the same tumour cells. The sensitivity of GH secretion to SMS 201-995 did not differ between the patients with pure GH or mixed GH/PRL-containing adenomas. Plasma PRL levels were not affected by SMS 201-995 in the patients with pure GH-secreting tumours, but were significantly suppressed in four of the seven patients with mixed GH/PRL containing tumours. Chronic treatment for 16 weeks of one patient with a mixed GH/PRL-containing tumour with SMS 201-995 (100 micrograms three times a day) resulted in normalization of both the increased GH and PRL levels. It is concluded that SMS 201-995 does not affect tumorous PRL secretion in patients with pure prolactinomas. In acromegalic patients with mixed GH/PRL-containing tumours PRL secretion in some patients is sensitive to SMS 201-995, making these patients good candidates for chronic treatment with the analogue. The simultaneous presence of PRL in the GH-secreting pituitary tumour or the presence of hyperprolactinaemia in acromegalics does not play a role in the sensitivity of GH secretion to the somatostatin analogue.