Behandlung des Morbus Sudeck

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) was formerly known as “Sudeck’s atrophy”. The disease belongs to the group of neuropathic pain syndromes and is differentiated into three types. Type I is characterized by a lack of nerve lesions, type II by the presence of nerve lesions, and type III by the presence of other entities such as fibromyalgia. The exact pathogenic factors leading to the disease are still unknown and are currently the subject of investigation in various studies. These studies suggest a contribution of the central nervous system to the development and maintenance of CRPS. However, the clinical symptoms are well documented and include pain, autonomic changes and impaired motor function of the affected extremity. Diagnosis is based clinically on signs and symptoms. However, in a few cases radiography and scintiscanning may be useful to finalize the diagnosis. The treatment options are centred on the symptoms of pain, autonomic changes and functional impairment. A multidisciplinary treatment strategy is recommended, with surgeons, anaesthesiologists, physiotherapists and psychotherapists working together. Surgical intervention in this disease is only required in rare cases of neurological and bone pain, and the indications for such intervention are narrow and should be strictly observed.     

Free flap monitoring with continuous tissue oxygen tension measurement

Intraoperative and postoperative free flap monitoring by means of oxygen tension measurement was carried out in 11 patients. We used an invasive flexible microcatheter that allowed for measurement of oxygen tension in all types of free flaps. Two cases of the measured flaps were buried free flaps which do not allow monitoring by clinical assessment. All flaps monitored in this study survived. One case of displacement of the microcatheter occurred. In one patient, the tissue pO₂ monitor successfully detected early vascular thrombosis with subsequent reoperation and salvage of the free flap.     

The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and medial arterial calcification in patients with chronic renal failure: requirements for diagnostics

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) is limited because of a lack of uniformity in disease definition and recognition. Furthermore, little is known of the prevalence of medial arterial calcification (MAC) in patients with CRF. Our goal is to study the prevalence of PAD and MAC defined by ankle brachial index (ABI) or toe brachial index (TBI) measurements in a Finnish population of patients with CRF consisting of predialysis and dialysis patients, as well as renal transplant recipients. METHODS: We examined 136 patients with CRF and 59 control subjects. Fifty-nine of the patients with CRF had moderate to severe predialysis CRF, 36 patients were on dialysis treatment, and 41 were renal transplant recipients. Mean age of patients was 51.9 +/- 11.5 years, and 39 patients (29%) had diabetes. ABI and TBI were measured by means of photoplethysmography. The definition of PAD required an ABI value of 0.90 or less, a TBI value of 0.60 or less, or a previous positive lower-extremity angiogram result. ABI values of 1.3 or greater or incompressible arteries at ankle level indicated MAC. The presence of claudication was determined by an interview. RESULTS: Prevalences of PAD on this study were 22.0% in patients with predialysis CRF, 30.6% in patients on dialysis treatment, 14.6% in renal transplant recipients, and 1.7% in the control group (P = 0.001). Prevalences of MAC were 23.7%, 41.7%, 23.1%, and 3.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Only 9 patients had claudication, and 6 of those patients had PAD. CONCLUSION: Both asymptomatic PAD and MAC are common in patients with CRF. Therefore, we recommend the use of both ABI and TBI measurements in the evaluation of PAD in patients with CRF.