Regional extraction of circulating norepinephrine, DOPA, and dihydroxyphenylglycol in humans

Dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) is the main intraneuronal metabolite of the sympathetic neurotransmitter, norepinephrine (NE), and dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) the immediate product of the rate-limiting step in catecholamine biosynthesis. Simultaneous measurements of regional rates of appearance (spillovers) of NE, DOPA, and DHPG in plasma have the potential to provide unique information about aspects of sympathoneural function but have not actually been measured in humans. In the present study, spillovers of DHPG, DOPA, and NE in the heart, head, leg, and lungs, were estimated from regional extraction fractions of infused [3H]-1-NE, DHPG, and [13C6]DOPA or unlabelled DOPA in humans during cardiac catheterization. There was little cardiac extraction of DHPG (7 +/- SEM 2%) or DOPA (8 +/- 4%) but substantial extraction of NE (69 +/- 4%). Values for cardiac spillover of DHPG and DOPA therefore were similar to values for the arteriovenous increment times plasma flow (arteriovenous production rate), whereas the cardiac spillover of NE averaged about 7-times the NE arteriovenous production rate. Cardiac DHPG spillover (28 +/- 3 ng/min) exceeded the spillovers of NE (9 +/- 2 ng/min) and DOPA (15 +/- 4 ng/min). In contrast, cranial DOPA spillover (159 ng/min) exceeded those of NE and DHPG by 8- and 2-fold and accounted for about 1/10 of the total spillover of DOPA into arterial plasma. In the femoral vascular bed, arteriovenous production rates of NE and DHPG were unrelated to femoral spillovers of NE and DHPG. Arterial and regional clearances of [13C6]DOPA were similar to those of unlabelled DOPA. The results suggest that (1) endogenous NE, DOPA, and DHPG all are released into the bloodstream by the heart, head, and limbs of humans; (2) DHPG and DOPA are not co-released with NE; (3) cardiac arteriovenous production rates of DOPA and DHPG can be used to indicate cardiac spillover of these catechols, whereas the cardiac NE arteriovenous production rate substantially underestimates cardiac NE spillover; and (4) estimates of limb spillover of NE and DHPG require concurrent measurements of the corresponding regional clearances.     

The effect of naloxone on the preoperative gastric volume and pH

The effect of 4 mg oral naloxone on preoperative gastric volume and pH of gastric aspirate was studied in a double-blind, randomized study. Twenty patients received 10 ml of naloxone (4 mg) mixed with 10 ml of orange juice, and 20 patients received 10 ml of isotonic saline mixed with 10 ml of orange juice, 2 h before surgery. Gastric content was obtained immediately after intubation of the trachea. No significant difference in gastric volume and pH of gastric aspirate was found between the two groups. It is concluded that naloxone does not affect gastric emptying and gastric acid secretion to a degree great enough to protect against aspiration of gastric contents into the lungs.     

Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The high prevalence of smoking among women in their reproductive years continues to be a matter of concern. The negative effects of smoking on general health are well known, but smoking may also affect fertility. The objective of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is an association between smoking and risk of infertility in women of reproductive age, and to assess the size of this effect. In the 12 studies used for this meta- analysis, the overall value of the odds ratio (OR) for risk of infertility in women smokers versus non-smokers was 1.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-1.91]. Studies of subfertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment also show a reduction in fecundity among women smokers. A meta-analysis of nine studies found an OR of 0.66 (95% CI 0.49-0.88) for pregnancies per number of IVF- treated cycles in smokers versus non-smokers. Despite the potential limitations of meta-analyses of observational studies, the evidence presented in this review is compelling because of the consistency of effect across different study designs, sample size and types of outcome. However, continued reassurance is needed that the calculated overall effect is not in fact due to confounding variables.