Treatment of myofascial trigger points in common shoulder disorders by physical therapy: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN75722066]

Background  

Shoulder disorders are a common health problem in western societies. Several treatment protocols have been developed for the clinical management of persons with shoulder pain. However available evidence does not support any protocol as being superior over others. Systematic reviews provide some evidence that certain physical therapy interventions (i.e. supervised exercises and mobilisation) are effective in particular shoulder disorders (i.e. rotator cuff disorders, mixed shoulder disorders and adhesive capsulitis), but there is an ongoing need for high quality trials of physical therapy interventions. Usually, physical therapy consists of active exercises intended to strengthen the shoulder muscles as stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint or perform mobilisations to improve restricted mobility of the glenohumeral or adjacent joints (shoulder girdle). It is generally accepted that a-traumatic shoulder problems are the result of impingement of the subacromial structures, such as the bursa or rotator cuff tendons. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in shoulder muscles may also lead to a complex of symptoms that are often seen in patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement or rotator cuff tendinopathy. Little is known about the treatment of MTrPs in patients with shoulder disorders.     

Restoring teeth that are endodontically treated through existing crowns. Part I: Survey of pulpal status on access.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the pulpal findings encountered by practitioners when accessing complete-coverage crowns that require nonsurgical root canal treatment and the relevance of coronal leakage to the success of the RTC. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The survey package consisted of a cover letter stating the instructions, rationale, and purpose for the questionnaire, a questionnaire with 8 short-answer questions, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope. A randomized sample of active dentists (300 general practitioners, 300 prosthodontists, and 300 endodontists) was selected. Collected data were analyzed with the chi-square test. RESULTS: A 60% response rate was obtained. Statistically significant differences were found among the practitioner groups, depending on the question. General practitioners and endodontists obtain access through crowns and maintain these crowns as final restoration significantly more often than do prosthodontists. Practitioners responded that teeth with complete crowns require nonsurgical root canal treatment after 5 to 10 years. CONCLUSION: Respondents believe that leakage must be addressed when endodontic access cavities in artificial crowns are restored after nonsurgical root canal treatment. General practitioners perform nonsurgical root canal treatment more frequently than do prosthodontists. Practitioners indicated that when teeth with complete crowns require nonsurgical root canal treatment, treatment is most often performed 5 to 10 years after placement of the crown.