Metaphase and anaphase analysis of V79 cells exposed to erionite, UICC chrysotile and UICC crocidolite

The cytogenetic effects of erionite treatment of V79 cells werecompared with those of UICC crocidolite and UICC chrysotiletreatment. A significant reduction in diploid cells with anaccompanying increase in aneuploid and polyploid cells was observedwith all three treatments. In the erionite-treated cultures,an increase in aneuploid was observedy at all dose levels rangingfrom 10 to 100 µg/ml, whereas in the crocidolite- andchrysotile-treated cultures, significant increases in aneuploidywere observed at all dose levels except the low dose, 10 µg/ml.Chromatid aberrations were observed in cultures treated withcrocidolite and chrysotile and were especially pronounced atdose 100 µg/ml of chrysotile. The clastogenic effect oferionite was weaker but statistically significant at dose 100µg/ml. An extrapolation of these cytogenetic changes overdose in number of fibers suggests that erionite was more reactivethan the other two minerals in producing aneuploidy. The numberof fibers required to produce a similar degree of cytogeneticeffects was several orders of magnitude higher for chrysotileand crocidolite than erionite. These results correlate withthe higher tumorigenic potency of erionite. In general, fewercells treated with erionite entered anaphase than those treatedwith the other two minerals. As a result, abnormal anaphasesrepresenting chromosomal mis-segregation were observed onlyin the chrysotile- and crocidolite-treated cultures. To ourknowledge, this is the first report on cytogenetic effects oferionite.     

Divergent expression and localization of aquaporin 5, an exocrine-type water channel,in the submandibular gland of Sprague-Dawley rats

By Western blot analysis, the expression level of aquaporin (AQP) 5 in the submandibular gland (SMG) was found to be different among individual rats of the Sprague-Dawley (SD) strain. Such differences were observed for AQP5 but not for AQP1 and consequently the SD strain was divided into two groups, one expressing a high level of AQP5 and the other a low one. The difference in average intensity of expression between the two groups was more than twofold. Immunohistochemical analysis of the SMG demonstrated that the AQP5 protein was localized in the basal and apical/lateral plasma membrane of acinar cells in rats expressing the high level of AQP5. In the rat expressing the low level, however, this channel protein was localized strongly in the apical/lateral plasma membrane, but only very weakly in the basal membrane of the acinar cells. Such a diverse localization of AQP5 was confirmed by Western blotting as well. Breeding between brother and sister was repeated for two times within high expressers and low expressers to obtain the third generation progenies (F2); the AQP5 level of the SMG in the third generation (F2 rats) from high expressers was significantly higher than the F2 from low expressers. Our present study suggests the existence of genetic variation in the expression of a water channel protein, AQP5, in rats.