Arylsulfatase A in urine of patients with urothelial tumors

A significant increase in urine arylsulfatase A activity (p less than 0.01) was found in patients with urothelial tumors. Arylsulfatase A activity was 1.36 +/- 1.10 U/24-h urine in control specimens, 1.90 +/- 1.66 U/24-h urine in various genitourinary tract disorders, and 3.90 +/- 1.98 U/24-h urine in transitional cell carcinoma specimens. Surgical treatment of the neoplastic patients lowered the arylsulfatase A activity found in urine to within reference values. The arylsulfatase A excreted by patients with these tumors was highly sensitive to thermal inactivation while the enzyme activity in the control urines was less affected by the heat treatment. The time course of the arylsulfatase A reaction with 4-nitrocatechol sulfate was not linear in normal individuals, while it was linear in 90% of patients with urothelial tumors. This difference in the kinetic pattern of the enzyme could be used to increase the diagnostic specificity of the determination.     

The glycine receptor: pharmacological studies and mathematical modeling of the allosteric interaction between the glycine- and strychnine-binding sites

The displacement by glycine of 3H-strychnine binding to rat spinal cord membranes cannot be explained by a simple competitive interaction. Indeed, protein-modifying reagents can completely abolish the inhibition of 3H-strychnine binding by glycine and other agonists, whereas the interaction of strychnine itself and other related compounds with the binding site is unimpaired. Moreover, glycine cannot inhibit completely saturable 3H-strychnine binding, the extent of its maximum inhibitory effect depending on the ionic composition of the medium. Hill coefficients less than 1 (whose magnitude also depends on the assay medium) were obtained from glycine displacement curves. These properties are consistent with a mathematical model of two different, but mutually interacting, binding sites for strychnine and glycine on the glycine receptor. The effect of ions and protein-modifying reagents might be explained in this model as modifications of the mechanisms that mediate the allosteric interaction, and/or the affinity of glycine for the receptor. The agonists beta-alanine and taurine and the new antagonists, THAZ, iso-THAZ, and 4,5-TAZA, also seem to interact with a site different from the strychnine-binding site, probably the glycine-binding site.     

Ausfallhonorar wegen Nichterscheinens zu einem Exklusiv-Termin

Abstrakt 1. Nimmt ein Patient einen ihm von seinem (Zahn-)Arzt einger?umten Exklusiv-Termin nicht wahr, obwohl er auf dessen Eigenschaft ausdrücklich hingewiesen wurde, so hat er dem (Zahn-)Arzt den Behandlungsausfall abzüglich eines angemessenen Eigenanteils des (Zahn-)Arztes zu ersetzen. 2. Die Ersatzpflicht tritt auch dann ein, wenn der Patient den Termin nicht in der in dem Behandlungsvertrag vorgesehenen Frist absagt. Eine hierfür seitens des (Zahn-)Arztes bestimmte Frist von zwei Tagen vor Behandlungsbeginn stellt sich für den Patienten grunds?tzlich auch nicht als unangemessene Benachteiligung i.S. des § 307 BGB dar. 3. Ein Anspruch des Arztes entf?llt auch bei nur mündlicher Vereinbarung nicht unter dem Gesichtspunkt des § 4 Abs. 5b BMV-Z, denn diese Vorschrift ist teleologisch dahin zu reduzieren, dass nur zahn?rztliche Honoraransprüche aus erfolgten Behandlungen schriftlich vereinbart werden müssen. Soweit es jedoch um einen vertraglichen Anspruch wegen einer Leistungsst?rung geht, vermag das Schriftformerfordernis des § 4 Abs. 5b BMV-Z grunds?tzlich nicht einzugreifen. (Leits?tze des Bearbeiters)