Effectiveness of two palliative support teams.

The palliative care of 227 consecutive patients by two support teams was measured according to 17 key indicators in the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS), an instrument previously developed and validated for use in these settings. Mean time in care was 71 days (range 1-547); 56 per cent of patients died at home, 26 per cent in hospital, 18 per cent in a hospice. Totalled ratings (sum of 15 items, excluding two items owing to missed ratings) improved in 83 per cent of cases, remained unchanged in 3 per cent and deteriorated in 13 per cent. The main problems which the STAS identified at referral were family anxiety, symptom control, patient anxiety and communication between patient and family. Fifteen of the 17 items showed significant improvements (Wilcoxon Z ranged from -3.18 to -8.20, p less than 0.00005) between referral ratings and ratings for the last week of the patient's life; family anxiety and spiritual needs did not. Patient anxiety and symptom control, although improved, also remained relatively severe at death. These results demonstrate the value of measuring key indicators and indicate areas where improvement in palliative care is needed.     

Do symptoms reflect a change in left ventricular function after aortocoronary bypass grafting in patients with depressed left ventricular function?

Seventy-nine patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction who underwent aortocoronary bypass grafting between 1971 and 1977 had follow-up heart catheterization at a mean interval of 3 years. Thirty-three patients (42%) had angiographic improvement in left ventricular function at follow-up and 18 (25%) had a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Fifty-eight patients (73%) had improvement in angina of at least one New York Heart Association class at follow-up. There was no correlation between late improvement in left ventricular function and improvement in angina. Improvement in left ventricular function did not correlate with preoperative indices of severity of coronary disease or with indices of completeness of surgical repair.     

What methods do stakeholders prefer for feeding back performance data: a qualitative study in palliative care.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the opinions of stakeholders (service commissioners and providers) on how performance data should be presented, in order to develop effective feedback methods to facilitate the use of these data in decision making. DESIGN: A qualitative analysis of semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews. League tables and fictional box plots were presented as an illustrative guide. The themes covered in the interviews were the effectiveness of these two feedback formats, their positive and negative characteristics, and ideas for new and improved feedback mechanisms. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six stakeholders representing a range of clinical and non-clinical roles within palliative care and the wider health care system across a variety of statutory and non-statutory organizations from London and the West Midlands. RESULTS: Box plots were received more positively than league tables, and qualitative information was considered more appropriate than pictorial feedback. Conventional methods such as league tables and box plots were judged to lack essential information on which important decisions could be based, such as additional contextual information and the methodological assumptions of the instrument. Both feedback methods were considered useful as an impetus to further discussion. There was a consensus that feedback should be constructive and able to be adapted to the organizational realities in which UK health services function. CONCLUSION: Qualitative research was viewed as the right evidence for gaining an understanding of the quality of end of life care. Stakeholders highlighted the importance of the lay perspective, which requires approaches that illuminate the subjective meanings of patient experience.     

Arterial response to excimer and argon laser irradiation in the atherosclerotic swine

Injury associated with laser-induced tissue ablation may be reduced by using pulsed energy delivery at low repetition rates, as opposed to using continuous wave energy delivery. This study was designed to examine the similarities and differences between these two systems as regards the healing process, and to examine whether one is superior to the other. In order to test this postulate, the healing response of normal and atherosclerotic aorta were examined after exposure in vivo to argon and excimer (XeCl 308 nm) laser radiation in hypercholesterolemic swine. Swine were fed hyperlipidemic diets for eight months following balloon denudation of the descending aorta. Following general anaesthetic, the descending aorta was isolated and laser burns were made on both normal and atherosclerotic intima using a continuous wave argon laser delivered through a 50 diameter quartz fibre, and a XeCl excimer laser carried through a 1 mm diameter fibre. Energy levels of 3 to 5 J were applied with the argon laser. The pulse duration for the excimer laser was 30 ns and craters were produced using 10 to 60 pulses at a repetition rate of 20 Hz and an energy density of 2 J cm^–2.Forty-eight hours after laser application, craters created by both lasers were filled with thrombus material. Argon burns were surrounded by thermal and acoustic injury which was not seen with excimer burns. Three weeks after laser application all crater surfaces were reconstituted. Unlike the excimer burns, argon craters demonstrated necrosis well beyond the crater margins and were characterized by multinucleate giant-cell reaction surrounding char debris. By nine weeks both excimer and argon laser burns were covered by fibrous tissue but could be distinguished by the fact that char debris and subjacent tissue injury arose with the argon burns.The results suggest that both lasers can be used to remove focal atherosclerotic plaque from arteries without inducing excessive thrombogenicity. Rapid healing is observed with both; however, damage to surrounding tissue is significantly greater with a continuous energy delivery laser as opposed to pulsed energy delivery.Work supported in part by: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Grant-in-Aid No. 5-17