Herpetic croup: two case reports and a review of the literature

Croup is an acute infectious illness usually occurring in children; it is characterized by brassy cough and stridor. The main pathogens include mainly parainfluenza and influenza viruses. Recently there have been reports of prolonged croup caused by the herpes simplex viruses. We report two cases of prolonged croup due to herpes simplex types 1 and 2. We also review and summarize the reported pediatric cases of herpetic croup.     

Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors of the Central Nervous System

Controversial issues relating to the pathobiology and classification of central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) have plagued neuropathologists for more than 70 years. Hypotheses advanced in the mid-1920's have remained as fixed concepts in contemporary literature, largely consequent to repetitious support by a small number of neuropathologists despite a growing body of information discrediting these ideas from neuroembryologists, oncologists, neuroscien-tists and pathologists.
Attention has largely focused upon PNETs arising in the cerebellum (commonly known as medul-loblastomas [MBs]), because about 80% of central nervous system (CNS) PNETs originate in this site. It has been asserted that the 20% which do not are biologically different, although most individuals agree that the histological features of PNETs that occur in different sites throughout the CNS are indistinguishable from those growing in the cerebellum.
The historical aspects of this controversy are examined in the face of evidence that there is, in fact, a unique class of CNS tumors which should appropriately be regarded as primitive neuroectodermal in nature. Specifically, a number of different approaches to the problem have yielded data supporting this hypothesis. These approaches include the identification of patterns of expression among a variety of cellular antigens (demonstrated by the use of immunopathological techniques), molecular analyses of cell lines derived from these tumors, experimental production of PNETs and molecular genetic analyses.
Differences of opinion among surgeons, oncologists and radiotherapists are typically resolved by conducting cooperative studies of patients with these tumors who are diagnosed and treated at multiple centers.     

Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4-8-year-old children

Cortical auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) were studied in 24 adults (12 men, 12 women) and 20 children (12 boys, 8 girls; age: 4-8 years). In adults, this wave was recorded with maximal amplitude at frontocentral sites, peaking at about 100 ms poststimulation, whereas in children the auditory response displayed maximal amplitude at the midtemporal sites, with a positive wave at about 100 ms and a large negative wave at approximately 170 ms. Moreover, the modulatory effects of intensity on N1 amplitude were prominent at frontocentral sites in adults and at temporal sites in children. Frontocentral negative response was also recorded in children but was smaller in amplitude and longer in peak latency (around 140 ms) than in adults; responses were of greater amplitude at the frontal site than at the vertex before 6 years of age, whereas the reverse was more often found after this age. These data suggest great differences with age in the neural generators contributing to auditory evoked potentials recorded in the N1 latency range.     

Comparing sulindac with indomethacin for closure of ductus arteriosus in preterm infants

Objectives: A prospective study comparing the efficiacy and side-effects of oral sulindac with intravenous indomethacin in clinically stable preterm infants (<1750 g) requiring non-invasive closure of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus.
Methodology: As maturity and birthweight are the two major determinants of ductal closure, infants were matched as closely as possible for these parameters. An eligible patient was first assigned to the sulindac group and a subsequent patient with similar gestational age (± 1 week) and birthweight (±100 g) to the previously recruited infant would automatically receive indomethacin. A total of eight infants were enrolled in each group.
Results: The ductus arteriosus was successfully closed in all eight infants receiving indomethacin, and in seven of eight infants receiving sulindac. No significant differences were found with regards to the ductal size between the two groups at diagnosis or on each of the consecutive days of treatment ( P >0.25). More renal adverse effects were encountered in the indomethacin group. Significant differences in changes from baseline value for urine output, plasma sodium, urea and creatinine concentrations were noted at 24, 48 and 72 h after commencement of treatment between the two groups ( P <0.05). All the parameters returned to normal or pre-treatment levels 48 h after stopping therapy. Unexpectedly, severe gastrointestinal complications were encountered in the sulindac group.
Conclusions: Sulindac is capable of promoting ductal constriction in clinically stable preterm infants without compromising the renal function. The spectrum of gastrointestinal complications observed in sulindac treated infants were similar to those described for indomethacin. The use of sulindac for ductal closure in the preterm infant should remain experimental.     

Test–Retest Reliability of Capability Measurement in the UK General Population

Although philosophically attractive, it may be difficult, in practice, to measure individuals' capabilities (what they are able to do in their lives) as opposed to their functionings (what they actually do). To examine whether capability information could be reliably self‐reported, we administered a measure of self‐reported capability (the Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure for Adults, ICECAP‐A) on two occasions, 2 weeks apart, alongside a self‐reported health measure (the EuroQol Five Dimensional Questionnaire with 3 levels, EQ‐5D‐3L). We found that respondents were able to report capabilities with a moderate level of consistency, although somewhat less reliably than their health status. The more socially orientated nature of some of the capability questions may account for the difference. © 2014 The Authors Health Economics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.     

Do capability and functioning differ? A study of U.K. survey responses

A core feature of the capability approach is that a person's capabilities (what they are able to do and be in their life) can differ from their functionings (what they actually do and are in their life). However, the degree to which capability and functioning differ in practice is unclear. This paper investigates this issue, focusing on capability and functioning differences (CFD) across different aspects of life and different individuals. In the study, the ICECAP‐A capability questionnaire was modified to measure both functionings and capabilities and was completed by U.K.‐based convenience sample of 943 people. Around one third of people reported CFD in at least one area of their life, most commonly in terms of their “achievement.” People were more likely to report CFD when they had a degree‐level education and when they had impaired health. An additional finding was that capability varied more with education whereas functioning varied more with health status. This finding needs further examination, but it suggests that the choice of evaluative space may influence how priorities are set for public spending.