Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation,thrombocytopenia and hematological malignancy

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - Managing anticoagulation in hematological malignancy patients with atrial fibrillation and thrombocytopenia is a clinical challenge with limited data. We...     

Efficacy and safety of aminoglycoside monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of any aminoglycoside as a single antibiotic with other antibiotics for the treatment of patients with infection. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of single aminoglycoside antibiotic treatment with one or more non-aminoglycoside antibiotic for patients with infection in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, databases of ongoing trials and conference proceedings. Two reviewers assessed trial eligibility, quality and extracted data. Pooled relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous data. RESULTS: The search yielded 37 trials of which 26 included patients with urinary tract infection. Aminoglycosides were equally effective as comparators in the analysis of the primary outcomes, all-cause mortality (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.68, 1.81, 9 trials, 503 patients) and treatment failure (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96, 1.27, 32 trials, 1890 patients). Aminoglycosides were associated with a significantly higher rate of bacteriological failure at end of therapy (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21, 1.72, 27 trials, 1668 patients). Subgroup analyses according to quality of trial, type of antibiotics, source of infection and rate of clinical sepsis did not alter the outcomes. Less adverse effects in total but more nephrotoxic effects were observed in patients treated with aminoglycosides. CONCLUSIONS: The present data support the use of aminoglycosides for urinary tract infections. The paucity of trials including patients with sepsis or reporting on mortality precludes firm recommendations for patients with infections other than of the urinary tract.     

Characteristics of initial compared with subsequent bacterial infections among hospitalised haemato-oncological patients

Surveys of bacterial infections among neutropenic cancer patients frequently report pooled antibiotic susceptibility data. Management guidelines address initial antibiotic regimens for febrile neutropenia. In this study, rates of bacterial infection and antibiotic susceptibilities among initial and subsequent or breakthrough episodes of fever were analysed. Prospective surveillance of fever of unknown origin (FUO), clinically documented infection and microbiologically documented infection (MDI) was conducted in the haemato-oncology and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation wards in a single cancer centre in Israel. Subsequent infections were defined as those developing during or after broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. A total of 567 febrile episodes were documented among 271 patients. Bacterial MDIs were documented in 104/162 (64%) initial febrile episodes and 75/405 (19%) subsequent episodes and Gram-negative bacteria predominated (64% and 71%, respectively). Escherichia coli was the most common species isolated. Higher antibiotic susceptibilities were observed for initial compared with subsequent MDIs for Gram-negative bacteria [ceftazidime 80% vs. 45%, piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) 86% vs. 40% and meropenem 95% vs.76%] and Gram-positive bacteria. TZP monotherapy was the most commonly used antibiotic and its susceptibility decreased to 22.2% following its use. Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was administered in 71/97 (73%) initial and 40/74 (54%) subsequent episodes (P=0.009) and was significantly associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio=0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.87). We conclude that previous antibiotic exposure significantly impacts antibiotic susceptibility and that pooled reporting of all infections can be misleading. Treatment guidelines should address the antibiotic treatment of breakthrough fever.     

Lamivudine prevents reactivation of hepatitis B and reduces mortality in immunosuppressed patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

To assess the effects of prophylactic lamivudine on reactivation and mortality following immunosuppressive therapy in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients, we performed a meta-analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized prospective controlled trials and retrospective comparative case series were identified through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. The primary outcomes were virological reactivation, clinical reactivation and mortality. Secondary outcomes included hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related mortality, liver histology, discontinuation or disruption of immunosuppressive therapy, lamivudine-resistant HBV strains and adverse events. A total of 21 studies were included, two of which were randomized controlled trials. Clinical and virological reactivation were significantly reduced in the lamivudine group [odds ratio (OR) 0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.15 and OR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01-0.14 respectively]. All-cause mortality was significantly reduced in the lamivudine group (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.23-0.56) which translates to only 11 patients who need to be treated to prevent one death. Lamivudine significantly reduced HBV-related mortality, and discontinuations or disruptions of the immunosuppressive treatment. No adverse effects of lamivudine were recorded, and resistance to lamivudine occurred in low rates. We demonstrated a clear benefit of lamivudine in terms of clinical and virological HBV reactivation, overall mortality, HBV-related mortality and interruptions or discontinuations in the immunosuppressive treatment. Lamivudine should be administered prophylactically to HBsAg-positive patients who are about to receive immunosuppressive therapy.     

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult patients with acute leukemia: the role of meta-analyses

In spite of decades of research in the field of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for the treatment of acute leukemia, controversies regarding the role of transplant still exist. These stem not only from contradictory results of different studies, but also from differences in the design and the strength of evidence of the various trials. Meta-analysis is considered the highest level of evidence and as such has the power to resolve clinical issues comparing between different treatment modalities. The aim of this review is to examine the contribution of meta-analyses to the establishment of the role of hematopoietic transplantation for acute leukemia and at the same time to highlight limitations and future directions.     

Management of aplastic anemia: the role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Aplastic anemia is a rare bone marrow failure disorder. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are the main therapeutic modalities currently used to treat patients with aplastic anemia. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the highest level of evidence and as such aid practitioners in solving clinical questions. The objective of this review is to assess the base of evidence for the common practice and the current guidelines for the management of aplastic anemia. It focuses on data obtained from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs conducted in this field. Specifically, it focuses on four major therapeutic questions: the roles of alloHCT, IST, hematopoietic growth factors and supportive care.     

High-dose imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients--systematic review and meta-analysis

Imatinib at a dose of 400 mg daily is considered frontline treatment in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing frontline treatment with imatinib 400 mg daily versus higher doses (≥600 mg daily) in patients with CP-CML. The search yielded four trials, randomizing 1,673 patients. At 12 months, high dose compared with standard dose imatinib improved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.26, four trials, I(2) = 33%) as well as major molecular response (MMolR) (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12-1.42, four trials, I(2) = 0%). There was no difference in all-cause mortality or disease progression at the end of follow up. Adverse events requiring discontinuation were more common in the high-dose arm (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.20-3.26, three trials, I(2) = 0%), as were Grade III/IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia: RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.15-2.12 and RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.28-2.70, respectively. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the routine use of higher doses of imatinib as frontline treatment for CP-CML. Extended follow up is needed to evaluate if the superior CCyR and MMolR with higher doses of imatinib will translate to long-term clinical benefit.     

Bendamustine for patients with indolent B cell lymphoproliferative malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukaemia – an updated meta-analysis

The question of which chemotherapy induction provides the best results for indolent lymphoma patients is yet unanswered. Different regimens have been compared, none of which has been shown to improve overall survival. The use of bendamustine is growing. A number of trials evaluated its efficacy for patients with indolent B-cell lymphoid neoplasms, including chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). To evaluate the efficacy of bendamustine in that population we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 randomised controlled trials (2726 patients). Bendamustine was compared to fludarabine-containing regimens, CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone), CHOP (CVP+ doxorubicin) and chlorambucil. Due to insufficient reported data, six of the nine trials were included in analysis of overall survival. Bendamustine was associated with a prolonged overall survival, (hazard ratio 0·79, 95% confidence interval 0·65–0·95). Data regarding quality of life was reported for two trials, therefore too scarce to pool. The risk of neutropenia was reduced with bendamustine treatment compared to other chemotherapy. Bendamustine induction is an efficacious option for patients with indolent lymphoma, and CLL. Maintenance therapy was not evaluated after bendamustine induction, and potentially there is an interaction between the two. Chemotherapy-free approach was shown to be efficacious for patients with CLL, while toxicity with that approach is not negligible.