HIV-associated lymphoma successfully treated with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSCC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), to treat patients diagnosed of high-risk or relapsed HIV-associated lymphoma (HIV+ Ly), responding to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: Prospective and multicentric study in patients with high-risk or relapsed chemosensitive HIV+ Ly, candidate for consolidation with ASCT. Eligibility criteria were similar to those of HIV- lymphoma. HAART was aimed to be maintained during the procedure. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were admitted. Adequate PBSCC was obtained from all patients (median CD34+ cells was 4.7 x 10(6)/kg). Three patients died before ASCT; two had disease progression and one died from VHC-liver failure. Eleven transplanted patients showed neutrophil engraftment after a median time of 16 days (range, 9-33 days), and nine patients showed platelet engraftment after a median time of 20 days (range, 11-36 days). CD4+ cell counts and HIV viral load (VL) were appropriately preserved along the procedure. No patients died from treatment-related complications. One patient died from lymphoma progression (day +19), and another died in complete remission (CR) with undetectable VL, 15 months after transplant, due to infection. One patient relapsed at 32 months after ASCT. The remaining eight patients are alive in CR with an event-free survival of 65% and a median follow-up of 30 months after ASCT (range, 7-36 months). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PBSCC and ASCT in HIV+ Ly patients responding to HAART are similar to those observed in the HIV- lymphoma setting.     

Safety and efficacy of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of a phase II trial

Immunochemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (R-CHOP) is the standard treatment in non-immunosuppressed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but its adequacy has not been definitively established in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related lymphoma. This phase II trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of six cycles of R-CHOP in patients with HIV-related DLBCL and to determine whether response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) had prognostic impact. Patients were eligible if they had performance status <3 and absence of active opportunistic infections. Eighty-one patients were enrolled, 57 in stages III or IV, International Prognostic Index (IPI) 0 or 1 ( n  = 26), 2 ( n  = 19), 3 ( n  = 20) and 4 or 5 ( n  = 16), and median CD4 lymphocyte count of 0·158 × 10⁹/l. The main adverse events were neutropenia (48% of cycles) and infections (10% of cycles), which were fatal in seven patients. Complete response was achieved in 55 (69%) patients, with an estimated 3-year disease-free survival of 77% and 3-year overall survival of 56%. IPI score and virological response to HAART were the prognostic parameters for response and survival. In HIV-related DLBCL R-CHOP is feasible, safe and effective. The prognosis depends on lymphoma-related parameters and on the response to HAART.     

Failure of a short-term prednisone regimen to prevent nevirapine-associated rash: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial: the GESIDA 09/99 study

OBJECTIVES: Rash is the most frequent adverse event associated with nevirapine. The use of prednisone has been controversial in this setting. A double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate its efficacy in nevirapine-induced rash prevention. DESIGN: Multicentered, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with prednisone (30 mg/day x 2 weeks). Inclusion criteria: HIV-1 infection; CD4 count >200 cells/mm3; plasma viral load (PVL) <5 log10 copies/ml; nevirapine (200 mg/day x 2 weeks, followed by 200 mg twice daily) plus stavudine and didanosine. Clinical follow-up was performed at 15, 30, and 60 days and thereafter every 2 months. RESULTS: In all, 75 evaluable patients were enrolled (39 prednisone/36 placebo). Median baseline CD4 + cell count was 390 cells/mm3 and PVL, 20,200 copies/ml. Overall, nine cases of rash (12.5%) were detected, seven (18%) in the prednisone group and two (5.5%) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-29.3; p =.11). Incidence of moderate-to-severe rashes leading to nevirapine withdrawal was 13.5% (5 of 37) in the prednisone group and 3% (1 of 35) in the placebo group ( p =.2). Median time to rash in both groups was 16 days. Adverse events that motivated withdrawal of therapy appeared in 6 patients from the prednisone group (15.4%) and 3 from the placebo group (8.3%) ( p =.3). CONCLUSION: Short-term prednisone administration does not prevent nevirapine rash, but might even increase its incidence.     

Similar Efficacy of Raltegravir When Used With or Without a Protease Inhibitor in Treatment-Experienced Patients

Abstract

Background: Patients with multiclass-resistant HIV-1 have limited treatment options. Raltegravir, an inhibitor of integrase, has shown excellent efficacy when used with protease inhibitors (Pis) in patients with drug-resistant HIV-1. Limited data are available however about the outcomes when using raltegravir without Pis in this population. Methods: Medical records of subjects who received raltegravir as part of the Merck EAP study 0518 were reviewed and abstracted at participating sites. Eligibility criteria included HIV positivity, age ≥16 years, limited or no treatment options due to resistance or intolerance to multiple antiretroviral regimens, detectable viremia on current treatment regimen, and documented resistance to at least one drug in each antiretroviral class (PI, NNRTI, and nucleoside analogue). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected locally using a standardized collection form. Genotypic susceptibility scores (GSS) were determined from the most recent genotypic resistance test available prior to the initiation of raltegravir. The main objective was to compare virologic results in patients who received raltegravir with a PI versus those who received raltegravir without a PI. Results: Four hundred forty-two subjects were evaluated from the respective sites in the EAP trial, of whom 340 were evaluable. The baseline mean HIV RNA was 4.6 log copies/ mL, and the mean CD4 cell count was 159 cells/μL. The median number of total and new antiretroviral agents in the background regimen was 4 and 2, respectively. Among the 254 patients who received a PI, the most common PI used was darunavir (89%). Etra-virine was commonly used in both groups: 39% of the PI group and 67% of the non-PI group. At week 12, 67% of PI patients and 64% of non-PI patients achieved HIV RNA <75 copies/mL and 85% and 86%, respectively, achieved HIV RNA <400 copies/mL GSS, which was similar in both groups at baseline, predicted achieving an HIV RNA of <400 and 75 copies/mL at week 12 (P < .05). Conclusions: In treatment-experienced patients, the combination of raltegravir with a regimen not containing a PI (used with etravirine in two-thirds of patients) had similar virologic activity when compared to more standard regimens using raltegravir with a PI. The main determinant of efficacy was the number of active drugs as measured by GSS. These data expand the potential utility of raltegravir in patients with multidrug-resistant HIV.