Regular Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia During Atrial Fibrillation in a Patient with Preexcitation Syndrome: A Case Report

AV Conduction in WPW. We report an unusual case of a relatively regular wide QRS complex tachycardia alternating with periods of an irregular narrow QRS complex tachycardia during atrial fibrillation in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Both tachycardias resulted from atrial fibrillation, the wide QRS complex tachycardia being due to 2:1 AV conduction of a type I atrial fibrillation across a posteroseptal accessory AV connection.     

Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Induced During Tilt Table Testing in a Patient with Syncope and Probable Dysfunction of the Sinus Node

We present a case of life-threatening arrhythmia occurring during tilt table testing in a 44-year-old man with syncope. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia occurred while the patient was tilted up under the intravenous infusion of isoproterenol (2 μg/min). No ischemia, QTc prolongation, or electrolyte abnormality preceded this event. The arrhythmia was not induced by programmed ventricular stimulation or exercise testing. Based on electrophysiological and clinical data, the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome was entertained.     

Time domain analysis of the signal averaged electrocardiogram in patients with a conduction defect or a bundle branch block

Doubts have been expressed about the clinical usefulness oftime domain analysis of the signal averaged electrocardiogramin patients with prolonged QRS complex duration. We studied147 patients using a signal averaged ECG (40–250 Hz) whoseQRS complex was longer than 100 ms. A baseline electrophysiologystudy was also performed in 128 of these patients. Seventy-sevenpatients had a minor (QRS <120 and >100 ms) conductiondefect. Thirty-seven of these 77 had either induced or spontaneoussustained ventricular tachycardia (group I) and 40 had no sustainedventricular tachycardia (group II). Seventy patients had a major(QRS120 and >100 ms) conduction defect, 44 of whom had sustainedventricular tachycardia (group A). The remaining 26 withoutthis condition formed Group B. Group I compared to group IIpatients had a longer filtered QRS duration (120·8 ±14 vs 104·5 ± 9·5 ms, P<0·001),a longer low amplitude signal duration (41 ± 12·1vs 31 ± 12·6 ms, P<0·0001) and a lowerroot mean square of the last 40 ms of the filtered QRS complex(27 ± 29·8 vs 35 ± 25·3 µV,P=ns). Group A compared to group B had a longer filtered QRSduration (157·7±20·2 vs 140·7±15·7 ms, P<0·001), a longer low amplitude signalduration (57·3 ±24·9 vs 37·8 ±20·3 ms P<0·001) and a lower root mean squareof the last 40 ms of the filtered QRS complex (14·3 ±11·2 vs 22·0 ± 10·5 1 P<0·01).Using conventional late potential criteria, the sensitivityand specificity of the signal averaged ECG for the detectionof sustained ventricular tachycardia patients with a minor conductiondefect were 89% and 75%, respectively. The same criteria appliedto patients with a major conduction defect were sensitive (sensitivity:87%) but non-specific (specificity: 50%). However, by usingmodified late potential criteria, such as the presence of twoof any of the following three signal averaged parameters: filteredQRS duration 145 ms, low amplitude signal duration 50 ms,root mean square of the last 40 ms of the filtered QRS complex17·5µV, we derived a non-optimal but still acceptablecombination of sensitivity (68%) and specificity (73%). We concludethat traditional late potential criteria can be applied in patientswith a minor conduction defect, but modification of these criteriais necessary to derive useful clinical information for riskstratification of patients with a QRS complex duration 120ms.     

Spontaneous Twisting of an Implanted Pacemaker Electrode in Three Cases

We present three cases of an unusual pacing lead aberration occurring at different times after implantation. In the first patient, the electrode was twisted close to the pacemaker, and dislodgment occurred on the 40th postoperative day. In the second case, there was only proximal twisting of the electrode. In the third case the electrode was twisted in two places: proximal to the pacemaker, and distal, within the right atrium. The complication was managed successfully by reimplanting the same electrode after stiffening the lead near the generator with a portion of the stylet.     

Time domain analysis of the signal averaged electrocardiogram in patients with a conduction defect or a bundle branch block

Doubts have been expressed about the clinical usefulness oftime domain analysis of the signal averaged electrocardiogramin patients with prolonged QRS complex duration. We studied147 patients using a signal averaged ECG (40–250 Hz) whoseQRS complex was longer than 100 ms. A baseline electrophysiologystudy was also performed in 128 of these patients. Seventy-sevenpatients had a minor (QRS <120 and >100 ms) conductiondefect. Thirty-seven of these 77 had either induced or spontaneoussustained ventricular tachycardia (group I) and 40 had no sustainedventricular tachycardia (group II). Seventy patients had a major(QRS120 and >100 ms) conduction defect, 44 of whom had sustainedventricular tachycardia (group A). The remaining 26 withoutthis condition formed Group B. Group I compared to group IIpatients had a longer filtered QRS duration (120.8 ±14 vs 104.5 ± 9.5 ms, P<0.001), a longer low amplitudesignal duration (41 ± 12.1 vs 31 ± 12.6 ms, P<0.0001)and a lower root mean square of the last 40 ms of the filteredQRS complex (27 ± 29.8 vs 35 ± 25.3 µV,P=ns). Group A compared to group B had a longer filtered QRSduration (157.7±20.2 vs 140.7± 15.7 ms, P<0.001),a longer low amplitude signal duration (57.3 ±24.9 vs37.8 ± 20.3 ms P<0.001) and a lower root mean squareof the last 40 ms of the filtered QRS complex (14.3 ±11.2 vs 22.0 ± 10.5 1 P<0.01). Using conventionallate potential criteria, the sensitivity and specificity ofthe signal averaged ECG for the detection of sustained ventriculartachycardia patients with a minor conduction defect were 89%and 75%, respectively. The same criteria applied to patientswith a major conduction defect were sensitive (sensitivity:87%) but non-specific (specificity: 50%). However, by usingmodified late potential criteria, such as the presence of twoof any of the following three signal averaged parameters: filteredQRS duration 145 ms, low amplitude signal duration 50 ms,root mean square of the last 40 ms of the filtered QRS complex17.5µV, we derived a non-optimal but still acceptablecombination of sensitivity (68%) and specificity (73%). We concludethat traditional late potential criteria can be applied in patientswith a minor conduction defect, but modification of these criteriais necessary to derive useful clinical information for riskstratification of patients with a QRS complex duration 120ms.