The HIV-Positive Physician and Disability Insurance

Occupational exposure to HIV is becoming a daily hazard in many emergency departments. Emergency physicians who are protected by disability insurance policies are likely to believe that if they are unable to continue working because of HIV-positive status, their disability policies will provide them with a source of income. Unfortunately, analysis of case law regarding claims under disability policies shows that the law is unlikely to consider an asymptomatic, HIV-positive physician disabled for purposes of payments under disability policies. Therefore, it is necessary for emergency physicians to make sure this issue is resolved before buying and relying on a disability policy so that an anticipated safety net will be operative over the full range of hazards that emergency physicians face.[Lavely R: The HIV-positive physician and disability insurance. Ann Emerg Med June 1994;23:1355-1362.]     

The emergency physician and patient confidentiality: A review

Confidentiality is a promise rooted in tradition, law andmedical ethics. Emergency physicians treat a variety of patients to whom confidentiality is of vital importance: employees, celebrities, victims of violence or disaster, minors, students, criminals, drug abusers, and patients with STDs. EDs should develop methods of ensuring confidentiality for all patients.³⁴Although confidentiality is an important principle thatshould be respected and guarded, it is not absolute. Various laws mandate disclosure of certain patient information; in addition, an overriding moral duty may occasionally require, a breach of confidentiality. As Beauchamp and Childress noted, “the therapeutic role may sometimes have to yield to ones role as citizen and as protector of the interests of others”.¹⁹ In general, however, circumstances requiring a breach of confidentiality are rare.     

Medical Devices Made Into Weapons by Prisoners: An Unrecognized Risk

Study objective: The alteration of a knee immobilizer into a sharp weapon by a prisoner prompted us to survey neighboring penal institutions to determine the frequency of such events. Design: We mailed a nine-item survey to all detention facilities in Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi. A second survey was sent to nonresponding institutions 6 weeks after the initial mailing. Setting: The Regional Medical Center at Memphis, the designated facility for evaluation and treatment of prisoners from the county jail and state penitentiary. Participants: Survey respondents included 25 state penitentiaries, 31 county jails, 1 state minimum-security facility, 1 state maximum-security facility, 1 work-release center, 1 county detention center for drunken-driving offenders, and 1 federal penitentiary. Results: Of the 81 institutions surveyed, 77% responded to one of the two mailings. Forty percent responded in the affirmative when asked whether stolen or unauthorized medical equipment from outside their institutions had been discovered among inmates. When respondents were questioned as to whether medical equipment, prescribed or not, had been used or altered in a criminal manner, 34% responded "yes." Medications and medical appliances were listed in the responses. Conclusion: A survey of 81 local and neighboring penal institutions in a three-state area revealed that the illicit use of medicine and medical devices by prisoners is a legitimate safety concern of prison personnel and health care workers when medical care for inmates must be sought outside the security of their institutions. The modification of medical equipment into weapons by incarcerated patients, although clearly recognized as a security and safety problem by police authorities, appears to be unappreciated by health care workers providing episodic care to inmates. [Hayden JW, Laney C, Kellermann AL: Medical devices made into weapons by prisoners: An unrecognized risk. Ann Emerg Med December 1995;26:739-742.]     

Sonographic localization of a retained urethral foreign body in an elderly patient

A retained urethral foreign body is an uncommon presentation in the Emergency Department. The diagnosis and treatment of retained urethral foreign bodies are determined by their size, location, shape, and mobility and often require specialty consultation and operative intervention. In this case of a 74‐year‐old man with a self‐inserted, retained urethral foreign body, we present the utility of a bedside ultrasound to detect the depth, size, and distance from the meatus of the object to guide the approach to extraction of the object at the bedside in the Emergency Department. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 46 :296–298, 2018     

An unusual complication of missed appendicitis

A case of necrotizing fasciitis complicating missed appendicitis with perforation and abscess formation in a 63-year-old diabetic is presented. The case emphasizes the importance of thorough, conservative evaluation and management in elderly diabetic patients. The ED management of patients with necrotizing fasciitis is also briefly reviewed.     

Use of continuous quality improvement to facilitate patient flow through the triage and Fast-Track areas of an emergency department

Application of Continuous Quality Improvement techniques can identify (a) major causes of delay in evaluation and treatment of ambulatory patients in an Emergency Department (ED) and (b) rational solutions to reduce those delays. To confirm this hypothesis, a prospective interventional study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital with 50,000 emergency visits per year. Participants included all patients discharged from the ED in three separate time periods. A formal continuous quality improvement process was used to document the current process of ambulatory care patient flow and prioritize the causes of delay. Solutions were defined and presented to the hospital administration. Two solutions were implemented immediately. The effect of these changes was assessed by comparing the time interval from presentation to discharge from the ED (length of stay) and the time interval from presentation to generation of a chart (chart generation). These differences were compared by analysis of variance on consecutive patients seen in a 48-hour control period and two postintervention 48-hour periods. The interventions that were identified and immediately implemented were the addition of an admission clerk and the reduction of the Fast-Track nurse function to include only patient placement and vital signs. The length of stay for all patients was significantly reduced from a mean of 163 ± 170 min to 115 ± 86 and 122 ± 105 min in two separate postintervention 48-hour samples. The mean length of stay for Fast-Track patients not requiring X-ray, electrocardiogram, or blood tests was 92 ± 46 min. After the intervention, this was reduced to 73 ± 46 and 67 ± 31 min in the same two 48-hour samples. Chart generation times were significantly reduced from a mean of 21 ± 18 min to 8 ± 6 min. We conclude that the formal application of Continuous Quality Improvement techniques in the Emergency Department can result in appropriate changes in the process of patient flow, leading to measurable and significant reductions in length of stay for Fast-Track patients.     

Care of the Intubated Emergency Department Patient

Background: Emergency physicians perform tracheal intubation and initiate mechanical ventilation for critically ill patients on a daily basis. With the current national challenges of intensive care unit bed availability, intubated patients now often remain in the emergency department (ED) for exceedingly long periods of time. As a result, care of the intubated patient falls to the emergency physician (EP). Given the potential for significant morbidity and mortality, it is crucial for the EP to possess the most current, up-to-date information pertaining to the care of intubated patients. Discussion: This article discusses critical aspects in the ED management of intubated and mechanically ventilated patients. Specifically, emphasis is placed on providing adequate sedation and analgesia, limiting the use of neuromuscular blocking agents, correctly setting and adjusting the mechanical ventilator, utilizing appropriate monitoring modalities, and providing key supportive measures. Despite these measures, inevitably, some patients deteriorate while receiving mechanical ventilation. The article concludes with a discussion outlining a step-wise approach to evaluating the intubated patient who develops respiratory distress or circulatory compromise. With this information, the EP can more effectively care for ventilated patients while minimizing morbidity, and ultimately, improving outcome. Conclusion: Essential components of the care of intubated ED patients includes administering adequate sedative and analgesic medications, using lung-protective ventilator settings with attention to minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury, elevating the head of the bed in the absence of contraindications, early placement of an orogastric tube, and providing prophylaxis for stress-related mucosal injury and deep venous thrombosis when indicated.