Functional properties of thrombocytes and inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes of the blood in patients with acute forms of ischemic heart disease

Blood platelet activity and levels of proteinase inhibitors and proteolytic components were assessed in patients with progressive angina of effort, spontaneous angina and acute myocardial infarction. alpha 1-antitrypsin and alpha 2-macroglobulin were shown to be involved in fibrinolysis regulation and kininogenesis. In acute myocardial infarction, there was a close inverse correlation between platelet release and blood kallikrein levels.     

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Clinical Trials for On-Market Diabetes Drugs

To the best of our knowledge, there are no published data on the historical and recent use of CGM in clinical trials of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of diabetes. We analyzed 2,032 clinical trials of 40 antihyperglycemic therapies currently on the market with a study start date between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2019. According to ClinicalTrials.gov, 119 (5.9%) of these trials used CGM. CGM usage in clinical trials has increased over time, rising from <5% before 2005 to 12.5% in 2019. However, it is still low given its inclusion in the American Diabetes Association’s latest guidelines and known limitations of A1C for assessing ongoing diabetes care.

The availability of reliable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems has proven to be a major innovation in diabetes management and research. Most current CGM systems are approved for 7- to 14-day use and use a wire-tipped glucose oxidase sensor inserted in subcutaneous tissue to monitor glucose concentrations in interstitial fluid. One implanted CGM system is approved for longer-term use (90–180 days); it operates with fluorescence-based technology. CGM sensors record a glucose data point every 1–15 minutes (depending on the system), collecting far more granular data and information on glycemic patterns than self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) alone. Real-time CGM or intermittently scanned CGM systems send data continuously or intermittently to dedicated receivers or smartphones, whereas professional CGM systems provide retrospective data, either blinded or unblinded, for analysis and can be used to identify patterns of hypo- and hyperglycemia. Professional CGM can be helpful to evaluate patients when other CGM systems are not available to the patient or the patient prefers a blinded analysis or a shorter experience with unblinded data.In the 20 years since CGM systems first became available to people with diabetes, technological improvements, particularly pertaining to accuracy and form factor, have made CGM increasingly viable for both patient use and clinical investigation (1,2). Average sensor MARD (mean absolute relative difference; a summary accuracy statistic) has decreased from >20 to <10% (3–10), including two systems that do not require fingerstick calibrations and three that are approved to be used for insulin dosing (11). Concurrently, size, weight, and cost of CGM systems have all decreased, while user-friendliness and convenience have increased (12).To encourage use of CGM-derived data, researchers and clinicians have worked to develop a standard set of glycemic metrics beyond A1C. In 2017, two international groups of leading diabetes clinical and research organizations published consensus definitions for key metrics, including clinically relevant glycemic cut points for hypoglycemia (<70 and <54 mg/dL), hyperglycemia (>180 and >250 mg/dL), and time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL) (13,14).CGM-derived metrics provide far greater precision and granularity than is possible with SMBG or A1C data alone (Table 1), enabling clinicians and investigators to better represent inter- and intraday glycemic differences with metrics such as TIR, glycemic variability, and time in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia (15). Crucially, CGM also allows for the accurate measurement and detection of nocturnal glycemia (16). The use of these metrics enables a more comprehensive understanding of glycemic management that can facilitate individualized treatment for people with diabetes or prediabetes. Although A1C is a useful estimate of mean glucose over the previous 2–3 months, especially when evaluating population health, it is important to include other glycemic outcomes in clinical trials. Furthermore, there is emerging evidence suggesting that TIR predicts the development of microvascular complications at least as well as A1C (17,18).TABLE 1Benefits of CGM Compared With A1C Alone in Assessing Glycemia

Formation of Morphine Tolerance in Offspring of Morphine-Tolerant Animals: Neurochemical and Neuroimmune Correlates

We carried out a complex physiological, neurochemical, and neuroimmunologic study of the formation of tolerance to analgetic effect of morphine and analyzed enkephalinase A activity in different brain structures and serotonin antibodies in the serum. More early development of morphine tolerance and a sharp increase in serum antibody titer was found in the offspring of morphine-tolerant rats. This points to an imbalance in the neurotransmitter system and can serve as a diagnostic marker of endogenous opioid system pathology.     

Scaffolds for cartilage repair of the ankle joint: The impact on surgical practice

BackgroundIdeal management of osteochondral lesions in the ankle joint is still theme of debate. Scaffold-based repair is emerging as a new approach for regenerative treatment.MethodsArticles published in PubMed from 2000 to January 2012 addressing cartilage scaffold-based treatment were identified, including levels I–IV evidence clinical trials with measures of functional, clinical or imaging outcome.ResultsThe analysis showed a progressively increasing number of articles from 2000. The number of selected papers was 19:15 focusing on two-step and 4 on one-step procedures; no randomized studies, 3 comparative studies, 11 case series and 5 case reports were identified.ConclusionsRegenerative surgical approach with scaffold-based procedures is emerging as a potential therapeutic option for the treatment of chondral lesions of the ankle. One step treatments simplify the procedure and the results reported are very close to the previous techniques. However, well-designed studies are lacking, and randomized long-term trials are necessary to confirm the potential of these techniques.Level of evidenceReview – IV.     

Clinical Outcomes in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Presentations in GARFIELD-AF: Implications for AF Screening

BackgroundAsymptomatic atrial fibrillation is often detected incidentally. Prognosis and optimal therapy for asymptomatic compared with symptomatic atrial fibrillation is uncertain. This study compares clinical characteristics, treatment, and 2-year outcomes of asymptomatic and symptomatic atrial fibrillation presentations.MethodsGlobal Anticoagulant Registry in the Field-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is a global, prospective, observational study of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation with ≥1 stroke risk factors (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT01090362). Patients were characterized by atrial fibrillation-related symptoms at presentation and the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Two-year follow-up recorded anticoagulation patterns (vitamin K antagonist, direct oral anticoagulants, parenteral therapy) and outcomes (stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and bleeding).ResultsAt presentation, of 52,032 eligible patients, 25.4% were asymptomatic and 74.6% symptomatic. Asymptomatic patients were slightly older (72 vs 70 years), more often male (64.2% vs 52.9%), and more frequently initiated on anticoagulation ± antiplatelets (69.4% vs 66.0%). No difference in events (adjusted hazard ratios, 95% confidence interval) for nonhemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (1.19, 0.97-1.45), all-cause mortality (1.06, 0.94-1.20), or bleeding (1.02, 0.87-1.19) was observed. Anticoagulation was associated with comparable reduction in nonhemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (0.59, 0.43–0.82 vs 0.78, 0.65–0.93) and all-cause mortality (0.69, 0.59-0.81 vs 0.77, 0.71-0.85) in asymptomatic versus symptomatic, respectively.ConclusionsMajor outcomes do not differ between asymptomatic and symptomatic atrial fibrillation presentations and are comparably reduced by anticoagulation. Opportunistic screening-detected asymptomatic atrial fibrillation likely has the same prognosis as asymptomatic atrial fibrillation at presentation and likely responds similarly to anticoagulation thromboprophylaxis.