排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Sararak Choosakul Kamin Harinwan Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn Krit Opuchar Theeranun Sanpajit Wanich Piyanirun Chaipichit Puttapitakpong 《Pancreatology》2018,18(5):507-512
Background/Objectives
Aggressive fluid resuscitation is recommended for initial management of acute pancreatitis. However, there are few studies which focus on types of fluid therapy.Methods
We performed a randomized controlled trial in patients with acute pancreatitis. The patients were randomized into two groups. Each group received Normal Saline solution (NSS) or Lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) through a goal-directed fluid resuscitation protocol. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at 24 and 48?h, mortality, presence of local complications and inflammatory markers were measured.Results
Forty-seven patients were included. Twenty-four patients (51%) received NSS and 23 patients received LRS. There was significant reduction in SIRS after 24?h among subjects who resuscitated with LRS compared with NSS (4.2% in NSS, 26.1% in LRS, P?=?0.02). However, SIRS reduction at 48?h was not different between groups (33.4% in NSS, 26.1% in LRS, P?=?0.88). Mortality was not different between NSS and LRS (4.2% in NSS, 0% in LRS, P?=?1.00). CRP, ESR and procalcitonin increased at 24?h and 48?h after admission with no difference between the two groups. Local complications were 29.2% in NSS and 21.7% in LRS (P?=?0.74). The median length of hospital stay was not significantly different in the two groups (5.5 days in NSS, 6 days in LRS, P?=?0.915).Conclusions
Lactated Ringer's solution was superior to NSS in SIRS reduction in acute pancreatitis only in the first 24?h. But SIRS at 48?h and mortality were not different between LRS and NSS. 相似文献2.
Nataporn Chaipichit Janet Krska Thongchai Pratipanawatr Verawan Uchaipichat Narumol Jarernsiripornkul 《European journal of clinical pharmacology》2014,70(5):607-615
Purpose
To explore how Thai patients assess symptoms as adverse drug reactions (ADRs).Methods
Out-patients at two hospitals in Thailand previously reporting suspected ADRs to statins were purposively selected to cover factors relevant to the accuracy of ADR reports. Semi-structured interviews explored the mechanisms participants used to work out whether their symptoms were related to their statin. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and independently thematically analyzed by two researchers.Results
One hundred interviews were suitable for analysis; 52 were male, age range was 36 to 77 years (mean?±?S.D.: 59.83?±?9.14) and most (92) were taking other medicines in addition to statins. Patient assessment of symptoms as ADRs fell into two major themes: medicine-related factors and external factors. Timing relationships were mentioned most frequently (74), followed by information received (55), seeing similar symptoms in others (7) and diagnosis through blood tests (4). Use of multiple medicines, consideration of the medicine versus diseases, symptoms occurring with more than one medicine or relieved through treatment reduced confidence in ADR attribution. Many participants proposed alternative explanations for symptoms, including old age. Lack of information and knowledge were obstacles to the assessment process.Conclusions
Patients assessed possible ADRs most often by considering timing relationships. While they also used medicine information, Thai patients received inadequate information to help them assess their symptoms. Patients expressed uncertainty and difficulties in deciding attribution when concomitant medicines and diseases were involved. The findings could support the development of a patient-friendly systematic tool for identifying and assessing possible ADRs. 相似文献3.
4.
Jarernsiripornkul N Senacom P Uchaipichat V Chaipichit N Krska J 《Epilepsy & behavior : E&B》2012,24(1):102-106
This study was aimed to assess the frequency and number of suspected ADRs reported by patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and to explore the factors that may affect patients' symptom attribution accuracy. A validated questionnaire containing an extensively checklist of symptoms was distributed to outpatients prescribed one or more AEDs. Data on concomitant drugs and diseases were obtained from outpatient records. All symptoms identified were assessed for causality. Of 1388 questionnaires distributed to 1214 patients, 830 completed questionnaires were returned (59.8%) from 727 patients. In total, 7815 symptoms were identified on 757 questionnaires (91.2%). Symptom severity ratings were positively related to the number of symptoms reported (p=0.003). Causality assessment found that 71.9% of the symptoms were 'true' ADRs and 28.1% were 'false' ADRs. Attribution accuracy was primarily influenced by the number of symptoms identified and indication for AED therapy, fewer symptoms and use for non-epilepsy indications being associated with greater attribution accuracy. 相似文献
1