Retrospective review of pemetrexed with or without platinum in malignant mesothelioma: The Australian 'Special Access Scheme' experience

Background: Pemetrexed and cisplatin have recently been shown to significantly improve survival compared with cisplatin alone. However, there are only limited data reflecting teaching hospital experience outside a clinical trial. Pemetrexed has only been available in Australia on a restricted basis since 2002. We reviewed our experience of patients treated on the Australian ‘Special Access Scheme’ at three major thoracic oncology units. Methods: Charts were reviewed for all patients enrolled on the scheme. Data was extracted on age, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, histology, prior therapy, time from diagnosis to starting pemetrexed, chemotherapy (pemetrexed alone or with a platinum), cycle number, response rate, actuarial progression‐free and overall survival. Doses were cisplatin 75 mg/m² or carboplatin AUC = 5 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 21 days. Results: 52 patients (32 male and 20 female) were reviewed. Median age was 58 years and 88% were WHO 0–1. Histology included 54% epithelial, 17% biphasic (epithelial and sarcomatoid) and 21% undefined. The median time from diagnosis to administration of pemetrexed was 145 days. Sixty‐five percent had minimal surgical intervention with video assisted thoracoscopy, pleurodesis and biopsy, while 19% had received prior palliative radiation. Seventy‐one percent were chemotherapy naïve, the remaining 29% having received previous platinum and/or gemcitabine regimens. Twenty‐three percent had pemetrexed alone, 35% in combination with carboplatin and 42% with cisplatin. The median number of cycles was 4 (range 1–13). The response rate was 33%. No toxicity was observed in 20% grade 3–4 toxicity in 10% (majority nausea/vomiting). The median progression‐free and overall survival times from starting pemetrexed were 184 days and 298 days, respectively. Conclusions: Pemetrexed‐based regimens are safe and effective in a community setting in malignant mesothelioma.     

Primary lymphoma of the mandible with diffuse widening of the mandibular canal: report of a case

A case of primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of the mandible with unusual radiographic presentation is reported. The panoramic radiography revealed diffuse widening of the right mandibular canal with ill-defined margins and absence of edge sclerosis. Computed tomography showed infiltration of the superior portion of the canal with involvement of the vestibular cortex of the bone and of the alveolar ridge. Correspondence to: M. Bertolotto     

Determinants of non-attendance to mammographic screening. Analysis of a population sample of the screening program in the District of Florence.

The characteristics associated with non-attendance to mammographic breast cancer screening were studied by interviewing a random sample (213 attenders, 121 non-attenders in the 1989 screening) of residents in one of the municipalities of the Florence District Program, where screening has been ongoing since 1970. The overall attendance rate was 60%, and it was dependent on age (40-49 years, 66.5%; 50-59 years, 62.5%; 60-70 years, 55.5%), whereas a significant association with socio-economic status, educational level and health-behavior reported in other programs was not confirmed in the study. This finding suggests that determinants of non-attendance may vary and should be evaluated in each local setting. The belief that screening is useless, fear of cancer being detected, postponement and laziness were the most common motivations of refusal stated by non-attenders, and such a negative attitude towards screening was rather strong since most non-attenders stated they would not like to be informed or stimulated to attend future screenings. Rapid improvement of attendance rates in such a context might be achieved only by putting special pressure on women aimed to change their negative attitude towards screening and their opinion about the benefits of early breast cancer detection. This might be regarded as unacceptable and however would involve high costs and a major organization effort.