The Influence of a New Timing Strategy of Band Adjustment on the Vomiting Frequency and the Food Consumption of Obese Women Operated with Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding (LAP-BAND)

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a new timing strategy of band adjustment on the short-term outcome of obese women operated with adjustable silicone gastric banding. Subjects: The outcome of 30 women without binge-eating disorder operated with laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding with a wider intraoperatory band calibration (LAP-BAND) was compared to that of 30 body mass index-matched women without binge-eating disorder previously operated with adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) applied by laparotomy with the usual intraoperatory band calibration. The patients were evaluated 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Measurements: (1) weight loss; (2) total daily energy intake; (3) percent as liquid, soft or solid food; (4) vomiting frequency; (5) rate of postoperative percutaneous band adjustments; (6) rate of band-related complications. Results: Both the weight loss and the daily energy intake did not differ between patients with LAP-BAND and patients with ASGB. After surgery, the patients with LAP-BAND ate more solid food and less liquid food than the patients with ASGB. Vomiting frequency was higher in patients with ASGB than in patients with LAP-BAND. The total number of percutaneous band adjustments was higher in women with LAP-BAND than in women with ASGB. Band inflation because of weight stabilization was performed in six (20.0%) women with ASGB and in 19 (63.3%) women with LAP-BAND. Neostoma stenosis occurred in one women with ASGB, but in none of the women with LAP-BAND. One patient with LAP-BAND presented band slippage. Conclusions: The wider intraoperatory band calibration performed in patients with LAP-BAND did not reduce the short-term efficacy of adjustable silicone gastric banding. This new timing strategy of band adjustment required more postoperative percutaneous band inflations, but it improved the eating pattern of the patients (low vomiting frequency and high intake of solid food).     

Bariatric Surgery in Class I Obesity

Class I obesity conveys an increased risk of comorbidities, impairs physical and mental health-related quality of life, and it is associated to an increased psychosocial burden, particularly in women. The need for effective and safe therapies for class I obesity is great and not yet met by nonsurgical approaches. Eligibility to bariatric surgery has been largely based on body mass index (BMI) cut points and limited to patients with more severe obesity levels. However, obese patients belonging to the same BMI class may have very different levels of health, risk, and impact of obesity on quality of life. Individual patients in class I obesity may have a comorbidity burden similar to, or greater than, patients with more severe obesity. Therefore, the denial of bariatric surgery to a patient with class I obesity suffering from a significant obesity-related health burden and not achieving weight control with nonsurgical therapy simply on the basis of the BMI level does not appear to be clinically justified. A clinical decision should be based on a more comprehensive evaluation of the patient’s current global health and on a more reliable prediction of future morbidity and mortality. After a careful review of available data about safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity, this panel reached a consensus on ten clinical recommendations.     

Obesity and COVID-19: The Two Sides of the Coin

The World Health Organization declared COVID-19, the infectious disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, a pandemic on March 12, 2020. COVID-19 is causing massive health problems and economic suffering around the world. The European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) promptly recognised the impact that the outbreak could have on people with obesity. On one side, emerging data suggest that obesity represents a risk factor for a more serious and complicated course of COVID-19 in adults. On the other side, the health emergency caused by the outbreak diverts attention from the prevention and care of non-communicable chronic diseases to communicable diseases. This might be particularly true for obesity, a chronic and relapsing disease frequently neglected and linked to significant bias and stigmatization. The Obesity Management Task Force (OMTF) of EASO contributes in this paper to highlighting the key aspects of these two sides of the coin and suggests some specific actions.     

Late Gastric Pouch Necrosis after Lap-Band<Superscript>®</Superscript>, Treated by an Individualized Conservative Approach

Late band slippage has occurred in nearly 3-10% of patients after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with an average delay of 13 months. Band slippage can rarely lead to necrosis of the enlarged pouch, a potentially life-threatening condition. We report a female (BMI 39.92 with co-morbidities) who developed acute outlet obstruction 2 years after LAGB placement. After prompt band deflation, an urgent Gastrografin swallow showed stomach slippage without emptying. At re-operation pouch strangulation was discovered. The pouch appeared to be ill-fated, but as no tear was evident on intra-operative assessment, we decided to simply remove the band and drain. The patient was successfully discharged after 8 days, and the last upper endoscopy showed only a large ulcer in the fundus that was healing. Proper and prompt management of symptomatic patients with stomach slippage, with early operation when acute obstruction is evident, can enable a successful stomach-sparing approach.     

Progress in Implantable Gastric Stimulation: Summary of Results of the European Multi-Center Study

Background

The Implantable Gastric Stimulator (IGS®), a pacemaker-like device, has been found to be safe and effective to induce and maintain weight loss. The LOSS (Laparoscopic Obesity Stimulation Survey) is a prospective non-randomized trial which enrolled 69 patients involving 11 investigator centers in 5 European Countries. In 19 patients, ghrelin was analyzed.

Methods

Between January 2002 and December 2003, 69 patients (F/M 49/20), mean age 41 years (18–65) underwent IGS implantation. Mean BMI was 41 (35–57), mean weight 115.0 kg (65–160) and mean excess weight (EW) 52 kg (13–89). The IGS was actived 30 days after implantation. In a subset of 19 patients studied further, 0, 6, and 12 months appetite and satiety score were evaluated and 0 and 6 months ghrelin profile was analyzed.

Results

The mean ± standard error %EWL was: 8.6±1.8 at 1 month, 15.8±2.3 at 3 months, 17.8±2.6 at 6 months, 21.0±3.5 at 10 months, and 21.0±5.0 at 15 months. There were no intraoperative surgical or long-term complications. 7 intra-operative gastric penetrations occurred, observed by gastroscopy, without sequelae. 1 patient required a reoperation to remove a retained lead needle. In the subset of 19 patients, appetite was reduced and post-prandial and inter-prandial satiety was increased after IGS implantation. In the 19 patients, despite weight reduction, ghrelin did not increase.

Conclusion

IGS can be implanted laparoscopically with minimal perioperative complications. Appetite is reduced and satiety is increased after the implantation. Ghrelin levels could be one of the mechanisms explaining weight loss and weight maintenance in IGS patients. If weight loss is maintained, IGS could be considered a good option for selected patients.

     

Short-term effects of weight loss on the cardiovascular risk factors in morbidly obese patients

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short-term effects of weight loss on the cardiovascular risk factors in morbidly obese patients. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Five metabolic cardiovascular risk factors (blood glucose, blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and triglycerides) were determined before and 15.3 +/- 2.1 months after laparoscopic gastric banding in 650 morbidly obese patients. Global cardiovascular risk was calculated according to the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) scoring system. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was 22.7 +/- 20.4 kg. Normalization of the metabolic alteration was observed in 67.3% of patients with diabetes, 38.3% of patients with hypercholesterolemia, 72.5% of patients with low HDL-cholesterol, 72.3% of patients with hypertriglyceridemia, and 46.7% of patients with hypertension. PROCAM score fell from 31.4 +/- 11.6 to 28.0 +/- 12.0 points (p < 0.001). The modifications of total cholesterol and blood pressure were unrelated to percentage weight loss. Percentage weight loss was significantly related to the reductions of fasting blood glucose, triglyceride level, and the PROCAM score and to the increase of HDL-cholesterol concentrations observed after surgery. However, the strength of these four relationships was generally low. The variations of HDL-cholesterol concentrations and blood pressure levels were more influenced by actual energy balance than by the extent of weight loss. DISCUSSION: Weight loss observed in the first 12 to 18 months after gastric banding was associated with a significant improvement of single cardiovascular risk factors and global risk. On the other hand, the extent of weight loss was poorly related to the magnitude of improvement in cardiovascular risk.     

Body composition in underweight elderly subjects: reliability of bioelectrical impedance analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In underweight elderly subjects it is important to estimate body composition and particularly fat-free mass (FFM). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a non-invasive method in determining FFM, but its usefulness in these frail subjects should be verified. The aim of this study is to verify in underweight elderly people the reliability of previously published BIA formulas in detecting FFM. METHODS: Fifty-seven hospitalized elderly subjects (27 males and 30 females) with body mass index <20 kg/m(2) were selected. In all subjects, FFM was detected by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Moreover, BIA measurements were performed at standard frequency (50 kHz and 800 microA) and FFM was derived using the main previous published BIA equations. Results: In men, Kyle and Rising equations gave acceptable estimates of FFM with a mean error, respectively, of 1+/-1.9 and 1.4+/-1.7 kg. Also RJL formula could be used after adjusting for a correction factor. In women, no equation seemed sufficiently reliable to estimate FFM. CONCLUSIONS: BIA method seems useful to evaluate body composition in underweight elderly men but it seems to have intrinsic limits in women. Nevertheless, the variability in behavior of the different equations suggests to be careful in adopting BIA equations.     

Extrapleural bullectomy or lung volume reduction: air tight surgery for emphysema without strip-patch.

Air leaks after stapled lung resections for emphysema remain the most common postoperative complication. Staple line reinforcement, alone or in association with a parietal pleural tent, is recognised as an effective technique for decreasing the occurrence of air leaks after pulmonary wedge resection. Several materials have been employed for reinforcement, most of them prosthetic and costly. We use the parietal pleural tent covering the pulmonary targets to be excised, as a reinforcement on which the staple is fired (2 LVRS and 6 bullectomy procedures). Air tightness and obliteration of intrapleural space are simultaneously achieved. We named our technique: Extrapleural Bullectomy (EB) or Extrapleural Lung Volume Reduction (ELVR), according to the indication of the operation. No mortality nor significative morbidity, particularly prolonged postoperative air leak, were observed. At the follow-up (3 to 12 months) no pneumothorax or residual spaces have occurred.