Esophageal strictures following nasogastric intubation

Esophageal stricture is not reported to be a common complication of nasogastric intubation. Two patients who had a Levin tube inserted in the stomach for nutrition during a prolonged coma, and finally presented with a severe esophageal stricture were observed and treated. The clinical history of the patients suggests that the pathogenesis of this lesion is probably multifactorial, secondary to induced gastroesophageal reflux, impaired esophageal clearance, high gastric acid output, and use of steroids. Jejunostomy feeding, rather than nasogastric feeding, is probably a better means to provide nutritional support in comatose patients, thus averting the risk of such a serious complication. Esophageal replacement with left colon interposition appears the treatment of choice for these severe esophageal strictures.     

Anastomosis

Esophageal anastomosis is still associated with a high rate of complications even though they have decreased considerably in recent years. Anastomotic leaks are more frequent in the neck than in the chest, and related mortality rate is not different. The leakage incidence does not depend on suture materials or on technical modalities used to perform the anastomosis. In fact, there is no difference between the leakage rate when comparing manual and mechanical anastomoses. The leak incidence after both mechanical and manual anastomoses is much higher in collective reviews than in reports coming from leading centers. Frequent esophageal surgeons can learn from their previous experience and therefore avoid technical errors, whereas casual esophageal surgeons do not have this opportunity. Performing an esophageal anastomosis is a technical matter, and suture healing is independent of the patient's biologic situation. Anastomotic fibrotic stricutures are frequent after both manual and mechanical anastomoses, and most can be avoided by meticulous suturing technique.

---

Resumen La anastomosis esofágica todavía se asocia con una elevada incidencia de complicaciones, a pesar de que éstas han descendido en forma considerable en los últimos años. Las fugas anastomóticas son más frecuentes en el cuello que en el tórax y las tasas de mortalidad no son diferentes. La rata de fuga anastomótica no depende de los materiales de sutura o de las modalidades técnicas que se utilicen para realizar la anastomosis. De hecho no hay diferencia en cuanto a la rata de fugas entre las anastomosis manuales y las mecánicas. La incidencia de fuga, tanto en las manuales como en las mecánicas, es bastante más alta en las revisiones colectivas que en los reportes emanados de los centros médicos de mayor importancia. Los cirujanos especialistas en esófago tienen la posibilidad de aprender de sus experiencias previas y con ello evitar los errores técnicos, en tanto que aquellos cirujanos ocasionales no la poseen. La realización de una anastomosis esofágica es un asunto técnico y la cicatrización de la sutura es independiente de la condición biológica del paciente. Las estrecheces fibróticas de las anastomosis son frecuentes luego de las anastomosis manuales, al igual que luego de las anastomosis mecánicas y la mayoría puede ser evitada mediante una técnica meticulosa.

---

Résumé Le taux de complications des anastomoses oesophagiennes, même s'il y en a moins ces dernières années, reste toujours élevé. La fréquence de fistules est plus grande quand l'anastomose est faite au cou par rapport au thorax, mais la mortalité n'en est pas très différente. L'incidence de fistules ne dépend ni du matériau de suture ni des modalités d'anastomoses utilisées. Il n'y a aucune différence lorsque les anastomoses manuelles sont comparées aux anastomoses méchaniques: L'incidence des fistules, que ce soit à la main ou à la machine est plus élevée dans les séries collectives par rapport à celle des centres spécialisés. Les chirurgiens qui font des anastomoses de façon régulière ont la possibilité de profiter de leur expérience et ainsi d'éviter les erreurs techniques, alors que le chirurgien occasionnel de l'oesophage n'a pas cette possibilité. L'anastomose oesophagienne est techniquement difficile et la cicatrisation est indépendante de l'état clinique et biologique du patient. Les sténoses fibreuses sont aussi fréquentes après les anastomoses manuelles qu'après les anastomoses méchaniques, mais la plupart peuvent être évitées par une technique méticuleuse.

     

Does previous endoscopic treatment affect the outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy?

STUDY AIM: Aim of this study was to assess symptomatic and objective outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy after unsuccessful endoscopic treatment, compared to patients having primary surgery. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between November 1992 and December 1998, 92 patients with esophageal achalasia underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. Intraoperative endoscopy was routinely performed. Sixty patients had primary surgery (PS); 32 patients had surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic dilatation (PD) (n = 22), or botulinum toxin (Botox) injection (n = 10). RESULTS: The mean operative time and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia were similar in the two groups. The incidence of intraoperative mucosal tears was 5% in the PS group and 12.5% in the PD/Botox group (P = NS). Mucosal tears occurred more frequently during the first 30 operations (17% vs 3.2%, P < 0.05). Median follow-up was 28 months (range 4-76). An abnormal esophageal acid exposure was documented in 2 patients in the PS group (7.7%), and in two patients in the PD/Botox group (13.3%) (P = NS). Lower esophageal sphincter pressure significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.01). The mean percentage of radionuclide residual activity in the esophagus at 1 and 10 minutes significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: There is only a trend, although not statistically significant, towards an increased risk of complications and adverse effects in patients previously treated by PD and/or Botox. The higher incidence of mucosal tears during the first 30 operations suggests the effect of the learning curve.     

Ambulatory 24-H Esophageal pH Monitoring: Normal Values, Optimal Thresholds, Specificity, Sensitivity, and Reproducibility

Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring is increasing in popularity as the means to measure esophageal exposure to gastric juice and document the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, particularly before surgical therapy. Normal values for pH exposure were obtained from 50 asymptomatic healthy subjects. Receiver operating characteristic curves constructed from another 25 asymptomatic healthy subjects and 25 selected patients with other markers of increased esophageal acid exposure showed that a composite score and the percent total time pH less than 4 provide the most efficient interpretation of the test with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 98% for the composite score, and a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96% for the percent total time pH less than 4. Repeat monitoring of healthy volunteers and symptomatic subjects in the inpatient and outpatient environment showed no significant difference, with the exception that the number of reflux episodes was significantly greater during the outpatient recording in volunteers. This did not affect the clinical accuracy of the test. Esophageal pH probes were well tolerated, but caused belching and coughing during the early part of the monitored period. We conclude that computerized ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring in the outpatient setting provides accurate and reproducible results.     

High-Dose Famotidine in the Maintenance Treatment of Refractory Esophagitis: Results of a "Medium-Term" Open Study

Forty-four patients with esophagitis refractory to standard H2-blocker therapy, who had healed after a 4- to 16-wk course with either 20-40 mg omeprazole or ranitidine at doses of 300-600 mg daily in a randomized double-blind study, commenced a 3-month maintenance course of therapy with 40 mg bid famotidine. The aims of this investigation were to assess the effectiveness of this regimen in preventing recurrence of esophagitis lesions and symptoms in this subgroup of patients with therapy-resistant disease and to verify whether patients previously healed with omeprazole have a higher recurrence rate than those healed with ranitidine. The results of the study show that, despite the high dose of famotidine, 48% of patients relapsed within 3 months, a third of whom were asymptomatic. Moreover, previous omeprazole treatment is associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence.     

Synovial sarcoma of the esophagus simulating achalasia.

Synovial sarcoma is a rare malignancy occurring mainly in the extremities. Only seven cases have been described arising in the esophagus. All of them presented as a polypoid mass involving the upper third of the esophagus. A case of infiltrating synovial esophageal sarcoma simulating achalasia in a 63-year-old woman is reported. According to the literature, the location and the clinical pattern of this tumor are exceptional. The clinical features, pathologic findings, differential diagnosis, and management of this condition are discussed.     

Outcome of Patients with Esophageal Perforations: A Multicenter Study

Background

Recent studies have suggested that stent-grafting may improve the treatment outcome of patients with esophageal perforation, but evidence on this is still lacking.

Methods

Data on 194 patients who underwent conservative (43 patients), endoclip (4 patients) stent-grafting (63 patients) or surgical treatment (84 patients) for esophageal perforation were retrieved from nine medical centers.

Results

In-hospital/30-day mortality was 17.5 %. Three-year survival was 67.1 %. Age, coronary artery disease, and esophageal malignancy were independent predictors of early mortality. Chi squared automatic interaction detection analysis showed that patients without coronary artery disease, without esophageal malignancy and younger than 70 years had the lowest early mortality (4.1 %). Surgery was associated with slightly lower early mortality (conservative 23.3, endoclips 25.0 %, stent-grafting 19.0 %, surgery 13.1 %; p = 0.499). One center reported a series of more than 20 patients treated with stent-grafting which achieved an early mortality of 7.7 % (2/26 patients). Stent-grafting was associated with better survival with salvaged esophagus (conservative 76.7 %, endoclips 75.0 %, stent-grafting 77.8 %, surgery 56.0 %; p = 0.019). Propensity score adjusted analysis showed that stent-grafting achieved similar early mortality (p = 0.946), but significantly higher survival with salvaged esophagus than with surgical treatment (p = 0.001, OR 0.253, 95 % CI 0.110–0.585). Primary surgical repair was associated with somewhat lower early mortality (14.6 vs. 19.0 %; p = 0.561) and better survival with salvaged esophagus (85.4 vs. 77.8 %; p = 0.337) than stent-grafting.

Conclusions

Esophageal perforation was associated with a rather high mortality rate in this all-comers population. Stent-grafting failed to decrease operative mortality, but it improved survival with salvaged esophagus. The results of one of the centers indicate that increasing experience with this less invasive procedure may possibly improve the outcome of these patients.     

Great saphenous vein protection in arterial reconstructive surgery

An original method of great saphenous vein bypass protection during reconstructive arterial surgery is described. The use of a reinforced prosthetic support (Ringed PTFE), surrounding the vein, avoids possible compression by anatomical structures and strangulation by scar tissue after reoperation. This technique can also prevent eventual dilatation of the vein graft. Since 1981, this technique has been successfully applied to 30 selected patients. On the basis of clinical experience, the authors conclude that this method is safe and effective, and may increase the long-term patency rate of saphenous vein grafts.