Does chair type influence outcome in the timed “up and go” test in older persons?

Objective  

To test the effects of the use of a collapsible, portable chair (chair B), as opposed to a ‘standard’ chair (chair A), on the outcome of the timed “Up and Go” (TUG) test.     

A diagnostic algorithm for male genital oedema

Male genital oedema can be defined as swelling or the appearance of swelling of the scrotum and/or the penile shaft and prepuce. Despite the various causes of genital oedema reported in the published work, a concise approach to the evaluation and management has not been sufficiently addressed.     

Reduction of atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rabbits and decrease of expressions of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor in foam cells by a water-soluble fraction of Polygonum multiflorum

Polygonum multiflorum stilbeneglycoside （PMS） is a water-soluble fraction of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. , one of the most famous tonic traditional Chinese medicines, that has protective effects on the cardiovascular system. The purpose of the present study is to elucidate the effects of PMS on macrophage-derived foam cell functions and the reduction of severity of atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic New Zealand White （NZW） rabbits. NZW rabbits were fed for 12 weeks with a normal diet, a high cholesterol diet, or a high cholesterol diet associated with irrigation with different doses of PMS （25, 50, or 100 mg/kg）. Treatment of NZW rabbits fed with high cholesterol diet with 100 mg/kg PMS attenuated the increase in plasma cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and plasma triglyceride. Treatment with 50 and 100 mg/kg PMS caused 43% and 60% decrease in atherosclerotic lesioned area ratio to total surface area, respectively. In U937 foam cells, PMS could decrease the high expression of intercellular adhesion molecule （ICAM）-1 protein and the vascular endothelial growth factor （VEGF） protein levels in the medium induced by oxidized lipoprotein when analyzed by flow cytometry. The results proved that PMS is a powerful agent against atherosclerosis and that PMS action could possibly be through the inhibition of the expression of ICAM-1 and VEGF in foam cells.     

Shared clinical decision making: A Saudi Arabian perspective

Objectives:

To determine preferences of patients regarding their involvement in the clinical decision making process and the related factors in Saudi Arabia.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted in a major family practice center in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between March and May 2012. Multivariate multinomial regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with patients preferences.

Results:

The study included 236 participants. The most preferred decision-making style was shared decision-making (57%), followed by paternalistic (28%), and informed consumerism (14%). The preference for shared clinical decision making was significantly higher among male patients and those with higher level of education, whereas paternalism was significantly higher among older patients and those with chronic health conditions, and consumerism was significantly higher in younger age groups. In multivariate multinomial regression analysis, compared with the shared group, the consumerism group were more likely to be female [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) =2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-6.27, p=0.008] and non-dyslipidemic (AOR=2.90, 95% CI: 1.03-8.09, p=0.04), and the paternalism group were more likely to be older (AOR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, p=0.04), and female (AOR=2.47, 95% CI: 1.32-4.06, p=0.008).

Conclusion:

Preferences of patients for involvement in the clinical decision-making varied considerably. In our setting, underlying factors that influence these preferences identified in this study should be considered and tailored individually to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.Patients and physicians assume different and varying roles in the medical consultation process. This could determine the extent of involvement of the patient and the physicians in the clinical decision making process and patient care management. In one extreme, the physician assumes the responsibility of the clinical decision with no or very little joint deliberation with the patient. This is known as the “paternalistic” approach.1,2 In the other extreme, the informed medical decision approach means that the clinical decision is made by patients and potential others, including family members, after obtaining all needed medical information that could enable the patient to make on appropriate decision. This is known as the “consumerism” approach to clinical decision-making.3,4 Shared decision making is probably at the center of this spectrum, in which patients and physicians exchange information, discuss the details of the medical problems, explore available treatment options, and conclude together an agreed treatment plan.5 The provision of health care that is consistent with the preferences of patients may improve the patients’ satisfaction and health outcomes.6,7 The practice of shared clinical decision-making was encouraged as it respects patients’ autonomy, values, and commitment to the agreed health plan and continuity of care.8 The relevant literature shows that most patients prefer to be offered information on their medical conditions, available options of treatment, and future plan of care.1,3,9 However, the extent of the involvement of patients in the process of decision making is variable and influenced by issues related to the patients status of their illnesses, and types of decisions under consideration.10,11 Patients of younger age, women, and with higher levels of education have been found to prefer an active role and to share this process. In addition, preferences of patients may change with time and different stages of the sickness.11,12 The complexity of this process is further compounded by the fact that patient views and attitudes towards involvement in medical decision making are influenced significantly by certain underlying cultural aspects. This necessitates a sensitive and individual approach for each patient.13 This study aims to explore preferences of patients from Saudi Arabia regarding their involvement in medical decision making, and to explore factors that may affect these preferences.