Peak expiratory flow rate and symptom self-monitoring of asthma initiated from community pharmacies

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of patient-performed peak expiratory flow (PEFR) and symptom monitoring as asthma self-management tools initiated from community pharmacies. DESIGN AND SETTING: 110 patients over 6 years of age were recruited from five private-sector community pharmacies. Patients were identified from pharmacist recall as having 'asthma'. Information on the frequency of their asthma symptoms, medication use, level of physical activity, school or work attendance and lung function was obtained using a questionnaire to classify patients as either mild, moderate or severe. Each patient was alternately assigned to either the symptom or PEFR monitoring procedure in the order they were recruited. Patients performing symptom monitoring used a visual analogue scale to assess symptoms, whereas those in the PEFR monitoring group assessed symptoms and used a pocket-size peak flow meter to measure lung function. Both self-monitoring groups were required to adhere to an individualized management plan based on guideline recommendations and to record their monitored data in a diary card for 2 months. Data from the diary cards were reviewed, collated, transcribed and analysed using the Student t and Mann-Whitney tests. OUTCOME MEASURES: The average monthly frequency of appropriate patient responses determined from their adherence to the self-management plan was used to compare the usefulness of symptom and PEFR self-monitoring. In particular, appropriate use of medication and need for medical consultation was compared. RESULTS: 21 symptom and 40 PEFR-assigned patients completed 2 months' monitoring. The average monthly frequency of appropriate responses in patients using PEFR (0.76) was significantly higher than that of patients using symptom monitoring (0.53, P < 0.006). Patients applying symptom monitoring had a higher monthly frequency (0.39) of inappropriate medication use compared to the PEFR group (0.14). Furthermore, the patients' mean daily symptom scores (2.85) were significantly lower than that estimated by the researcher (4.12, P < 0.03). For all three asthma severity groups a higher monthly average of appropriate responses was observed in patients using PEFR monitoring compared to those who used symptom monitoring. CONCLUSION: PEFR self-monitoring proved to be a more useful asthma tool than symptom self-monitoring. Patients applying symptom monitoring tend to underestimate the severity of their condition and use medication inappropriately. Active involvement of community pharmacists in facilitating and reinforcing out-patient self-monitoring would help to optimize asthma management.     

Development of a South African integrated syndromic respiratory disease guideline for primary care

AIMS: The Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA) initiative aimed to develop an integrated symptom- and sign-based (syndromic) respiratory disease guideline for nurse care practitioners working in primary care in a developing country. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed the guideline after reviewing local barriers to respiratory health care provision, relevant health care policies, existing respiratory guidelines, and literature. Guideline drafts were evaluated by means of focus group discussions. Existing evidence-based guideline development methodologies were tailored for development of the guideline. RESULTS: A locally-applicable guideline based on syndromic diagnostic algorithms was developed for the management of patients 15 years and older who presented to primary care facilities with cough or difficulty breathing. CONCLUSIONS: PALSA has developed a guideline that integrates and presents diagnostic and management recommendations for priority respiratory diseases in adults using a symptom- and sign-based algorithmic guideline for nurses in developing countries.     

Building capacity for antiretroviral delivery in South Africa: A qualitative evaluation of the PALSA PLUS nurse training programme

Background  

South Africa recently launched a national antiretroviral treatment programme. This has created an urgent need for nurse-training in antiretroviral treatment (ART) delivery. The PALSA PLUS programme provides guidelines and training for primary health care (PHC) nurses in the management of adult lung diseases and HIV/AIDS, including ART. A process evaluation was undertaken to document the training, explore perceptions regarding the value of the training, and compare the PALSA PLUS training approach (used at intervention sites) with the provincial training model. The evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial measuring the effects of the PALSA PLUS nurse-training (Trial reference number ISRCTN24820584).     

Cost‐effectiveness of educational outreach to primary care nurses to increase tuberculosis case detection and improve respiratory care: economic evaluation alongside a randomised trial

Objective To evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of an educational outreach intervention to improve primary respiratory care by South African nurses. Methods Cost‐effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, with individual patient data. The intervention, the Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA), comprised educational outreach based on syndromic clinical practice guidelines for tuberculosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia and other respiratory diseases. The study included 1999 patients aged 15 or over with cough or difficult breathing, attending 40 primary care clinics staffed by nurses in the Free State province. They were interviewed at first presentation, and 1856 (93%) were interviewed 3 months later. Results The intervention increased the tuberculosis case detection rate by 2.2% and increased the proportion of patients appropriately managed (that is, diagnosed with tuberculosis or prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid for asthma or referred with indicators of severe disease) by 10%. It costs the health service $68 more for each extra patient diagnosed with tuberculosis and $15 more for every extra patient appropriately managed. Analyses were most sensitive to assumptions about how long training was effective for and to inclusion of household and tuberculosis treatment costs. Conclusion This educational outreach method was more effective and more costly than usual training in improving tuberculosis, asthma and urgent respiratory care. The extra cost of increasing tuberculosis case detection was comparable to current costs of passive case detection. The syndromic approach increased cost‐effectiveness by also improving care of other conditions. This educational intervention was sustainable, reaching thousands of health workers and hundreds of clinics since the trial.