排序方式: 共有33条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
1993年4-11月作者应用石英紫外线灯管对治疗室空气进行消毒,采用沉降定量检验分别于消毒前后用琼脂培养血采样送检,结果显示消毒后空气细菌培养结果的〈500个/m^3,平均下降率达70%,达到了世界卫生组织和卫生部医院分级管理质量标准。 相似文献
5.
6.
目的 评价通过德尔菲法形成的"广州市重点人群肝吸虫病防治知识调查问卷"的信度、效度.方法 使用调查问卷对120名广州市肝吸虫病患者、新入职公务员、饮食从业人员进行测试,分层随机抽取其中60例进行重测,计算该问卷的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度.结果 该问卷Cronbach's系数为0.798,10个指标的Spearman相关系数均>0.7,P值均<0.01.对10个指标进行因素分析,产生三个公共因子,它们总共能解释总体方差的60.84%,10个指标因子负荷在0.514~0.841之间,均>0.40的基本要求.结论 该问卷的信度、效度良好,具有良好的可靠性和有效性,可用于评价广州市肝吸虫病患者、新入职公务员、饮食从业人员肝吸虫病防治知识水平.Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity on the questionnaire of hepatic distomiasis prevention knowledge for the key crowd in Guangzhou made by Delphi method. Methods The questionnaire of hepatic distomiasis prevention knowledge for the key crowd in Guangzhou was tested in a sample of 120 cases, including liver trematodiasis patient, enters the duty official, the diet jobholders.And the questionnaire was retested randomly in 60 of them after two weeks. By analyzing the results of the questionnaire survey, the reliability and validity were calculated. Results The whole Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0. 798. The correlation coefficient of 10indicators was more than 0. 7, and their P values were all less than 0. 01. Four public factors were produced by factors analyzing of 10 indicators, they could explain 60. 84% of the whole variance. The factor loadings of the 10 indicators were 0. 514 ~0. 841, which were all over 0. 4. Conclusoons The reliability and validity of the questionnaire have reached the demands of standard questionnaire. And it would be practical for hepatic distomiasis health education in hepatic distomiasis patients. 相似文献
7.
[目的]调查肺结核密切接触者应对方式与社会支持水平,分析两者的相关性,比较不同人口学特征肺结核密切接触者的应对方式、社会支持状况。[方法]采用特质应对方式问卷、社会支持评定量表对1 143名痰涂阳性肺结核家庭密切接触者进行问卷调查。[结果]1.75%的肺结核密切接触者积极应对方式得分处于低水平,4.90%的肺结核密切接触者消极应对方式得分处于高水平,98%以上的肺结核密切接触者主观支持和社会支持总分处于中高水平,肺结核密切接触者对支持利用度得分处于低水平。肺结核密切接触者的客观支持、对支持的利用度和社会支持总分与积极应对评分呈正相关,主观支持、客观支持、对支持的利用度和社会支持总分与消极应对评分呈负相关。多元线性逐步回归分析结果显示,家庭状况是主要影响因素。[结论]应对方式与社会支持密切相关,少部分肺结核密切接触者采用消积应对方式,社会支持利用度低,经济困难家庭是需要关注的群体。 相似文献
9.
10.