Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Clinical Trials for On-Market Diabetes Drugs

To the best of our knowledge, there are no published data on the historical and recent use of CGM in clinical trials of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of diabetes. We analyzed 2,032 clinical trials of 40 antihyperglycemic therapies currently on the market with a study start date between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2019. According to ClinicalTrials.gov, 119 (5.9%) of these trials used CGM. CGM usage in clinical trials has increased over time, rising from <5% before 2005 to 12.5% in 2019. However, it is still low given its inclusion in the American Diabetes Association’s latest guidelines and known limitations of A1C for assessing ongoing diabetes care.

The availability of reliable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems has proven to be a major innovation in diabetes management and research. Most current CGM systems are approved for 7- to 14-day use and use a wire-tipped glucose oxidase sensor inserted in subcutaneous tissue to monitor glucose concentrations in interstitial fluid. One implanted CGM system is approved for longer-term use (90–180 days); it operates with fluorescence-based technology. CGM sensors record a glucose data point every 1–15 minutes (depending on the system), collecting far more granular data and information on glycemic patterns than self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) alone. Real-time CGM or intermittently scanned CGM systems send data continuously or intermittently to dedicated receivers or smartphones, whereas professional CGM systems provide retrospective data, either blinded or unblinded, for analysis and can be used to identify patterns of hypo- and hyperglycemia. Professional CGM can be helpful to evaluate patients when other CGM systems are not available to the patient or the patient prefers a blinded analysis or a shorter experience with unblinded data.In the 20 years since CGM systems first became available to people with diabetes, technological improvements, particularly pertaining to accuracy and form factor, have made CGM increasingly viable for both patient use and clinical investigation (1,2). Average sensor MARD (mean absolute relative difference; a summary accuracy statistic) has decreased from >20 to <10% (3–10), including two systems that do not require fingerstick calibrations and three that are approved to be used for insulin dosing (11). Concurrently, size, weight, and cost of CGM systems have all decreased, while user-friendliness and convenience have increased (12).To encourage use of CGM-derived data, researchers and clinicians have worked to develop a standard set of glycemic metrics beyond A1C. In 2017, two international groups of leading diabetes clinical and research organizations published consensus definitions for key metrics, including clinically relevant glycemic cut points for hypoglycemia (<70 and <54 mg/dL), hyperglycemia (>180 and >250 mg/dL), and time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL) (13,14).CGM-derived metrics provide far greater precision and granularity than is possible with SMBG or A1C data alone (Table 1), enabling clinicians and investigators to better represent inter- and intraday glycemic differences with metrics such as TIR, glycemic variability, and time in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia (15). Crucially, CGM also allows for the accurate measurement and detection of nocturnal glycemia (16). The use of these metrics enables a more comprehensive understanding of glycemic management that can facilitate individualized treatment for people with diabetes or prediabetes. Although A1C is a useful estimate of mean glucose over the previous 2–3 months, especially when evaluating population health, it is important to include other glycemic outcomes in clinical trials. Furthermore, there is emerging evidence suggesting that TIR predicts the development of microvascular complications at least as well as A1C (17,18).TABLE 1Benefits of CGM Compared With A1C Alone in Assessing Glycemia

Relation of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide to progression of aortic valve disease.

AIMS: Recently an elevation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its N-terminal fragment (NT-proBNP) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR) has been described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relation of NT-proBNP values to the progression of aortic valve disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included. NT-proBNP was elevated in patients with AS (n=109) and AR (n=37) linked to disease severity. Values for NT-proBNP, pressure gradient, and left ventricular mass were identical in patients (n=22) after previous valve replacement and in those patients with mild AS. NT-proBNP levels decreased in 86 patients after valve replacement (2292+/-353 vs. 785+/-101 pg/ml; P<0.01) but increased in 82 patients who were treated conservatively (616+/-120 vs. 1155+/-432 pg/mL; P=0.029), related to the progression of disease. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP is elevated in patients with aortic valve disease linked to disease severity and decreases after successful surgical therapy but increases in conservatively treated patients. These data underline the consistent relation of NT-proBNP to severity of aortic valve disease. Therefore, NT-proBNP should be considered as a biomarker for the monitoring of disease during follow-up, but further studies are warranted.     

Effect of single doses of SLV306, an inhibitor of both neutral endopeptidase and endothelin-converting enzyme, on pulmonary pressures in congestive heart failure

SLV306, a potent neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor with additional endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE)-inhibitory activity, in doses of 200, 400, and 800 mg reduced pulmonary and right atrial pressures, although there was not a clear dose response. Systemic blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output were unaffected. SLV306 increased plasma natriuretic peptides and big endothelin-1 levels in a dose-dependent manner, confirming NEP and ECE inhibition. The combined inhibition of NEP and ECE may be useful in heart failure by reducing right and left cardiac filling pressures.     

Relation of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to severity of valvular aortic stenosis

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been shown to be a reliable biochemical marker for left ventricular wall stress and is increased in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We evaluated the role of NT pro-BNP as a biochemical marker in the diagnosis of AS and whether it contributes to the optimal timing for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Included in this study were 146 patients who had AS, 31 who underwent AVR, and 32 who had "normal valve function" (controls). Increased NT pro-BNP was closely linked to severity of AS (mild AS 612 +/- 151 pg/ml, moderate AS 1,441 +/- 32 pg/ml, severe AS 2,579 +/- 13 pg/ml, AVR 593 +/- 148 pg/ml, controls 140 +/- 27 pg/ml; p <0,01) and to New York Heart Association functional class (class I 601 +/- 116 pg/ml, class II 1,119 +/- 216 pg/ml, class III 1,998 +/- 459 pg/ml, class IV 5,107 +/- 1,512 pg/ml; p <0.01). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for NT pro-BNP as a predictor for AVR was 0.73. Using an optimized cutoff of 550 pg/ml for NT-proBNP, the positive predictive value was 85%. Thus, NT pro-BNP is linked to severity of AS and New York Heart Association class and is an indication for AVR. Therefore, it is a useful biochemical marker to evaluate severity of AS, monitor disease progression at an early stage, and decide on the optimal time for AVR.     

Effects of candesartan cilexetil “add-on” treatment in congestive heart failure outpatients in daily practice

Aims  In the present study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan) as “add-on” treatment in congestive heart failure (CHF) in daily practice. Methods and results  In this open-label, multicenter study 414 CHF outpatients (NYHA II/III) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels > 200 pg/ml at baseline were enrolled. Patients were treated with standard therapy including at least one angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in addition to another CHF drug; 91% of the patients received beta-blockers. Candesartan was uptitrated to 32 mg/day (target dose if tolerated) during 6 weeks followed by constant dosing over 16 weeks. The primary endpoint plasma BNP was significantly reduced by 25% at week 22 (from 394 to 295 pg/ml, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Candesartan produced early and sustained improvements of plasma BNP/NT-pro-BNP, LVEF, and quality of life (SF-36) compared to baseline. Of patients on beta-blockers, 37% improved towards NYHA II/I at week 22 (P < 0.0001) and 53.5% of the patients in NYHA III at baseline improved into NYHA II/I at week 22 (n = 232, P < 0.0001). Candesartan was well tolerated; no unexpected findings were reported besides known adverse reactions including hypotension, hyperkalemia, and serum creatinine elevations. Conclusion  Candesartan “add-on” treatment provides a good benefit/risk ratio in CHF outpatients in daily practice, although high-risk patients should be managed with frequent monitoring of BP, serum potassium, and renal function.     

Circulating tumor cell analysis in patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To better direct targeted therapies to the patients with tumors that express the target, there is an urgent need for blood-based assays that provide expression information on a consistent basis in real time with minimal patient discomfort. We aimed to use immunomagnetic-capture technology to isolate and analyze circulating tumor cells (CTC) from small volumes of peripheral blood of patients with advanced prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Blood was collected from 63 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. CTCs were isolated by the Cell Search system, which uses antibodies to epithelial cell adhesion marker and immunomagnetic capture. CTCs were defined as nucleated cells positive for cytokeratins and negative for CD45. Captured cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence, Papanicolau staining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Most patients (65%) had 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL blood sample. Cell counts were consistent between laboratories (c = 0.99) and did not change significantly over 72 or 96 h of storage before processing (c = 0.99). Their identity as prostate cancer cells was confirmed by conventional cytologic analysis. Molecular profiling, including analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, chromosome ploidy, and androgen receptor (AR) gene amplification, was possible for all prostate cancer patients with >or=5 CTCs. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of cancer-related alterations at the DNA and protein level from CTCs is feasible in a hospital-based clinical laboratory. The alterations observed in EGFR and AR suggest that the methodology may have a role in clinical decision making.     

Clinical applications of molecular monitoring in leukemia

Molecular analyses of the leukemias have been able to identify unique markers that can be used as "molecular signatures" for the various diseases. In acute promyelocytic leukemia, qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has helped define the clinical syndrome and has been used to guide therapy. Quantitative modifications of the PCR technique have been investigated in chronic myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphocytic leukemia and found to correlate with clinical outcomes. These assays may soon be incorporated into standard clinical management and may result in a new definition of response.     

Refractory Aspergillus pneumonia in patients with acute leukemia: successful therapy with combination caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspergillosis and other invasive fungal infections (IFIs) commonly complicate the management of patients with acute leukemia. Standard amphotericin-based therapies may be ineffective for many patients and the available salvage agents (itraconazole and caspofungin) are reported to possess only moderate activity against resistant infections. Laboratory evidence suggests a synergistic interaction between amphotericin and caspofungin. The authors treated a group of patients with amphotericin-refractory IFIs with the combination of caspofungin and amphotericin (or liposomal amphotericin). METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients with amphotericin-resistant IFIs was conducted. Diagnosis was based on clinical, radiographic, and when available, microbiologic data. Response to combination antifungal therapy was graded as either favorable or unfavorable. Favorable responses included improvement of both clinical and radiographic signs of fungal pneumonia. All other responses were graded as unfavorable. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in this analysis. Twenty-six patients had acute leukemia. Based on recently published criteria, the IFIs were classified as proven in 6 patients, probable in 4 patients, and possible in 20 patients. The median duration and dose of amphotericin monotherapy were 12 days (range, 4-65 days) and 7.8 mg/kg (range, 4.2-66.1 mg/kg), respectively. The median duration of combination therapy was 24 days (range, 3-74 days). Eighteen patients (60%) experienced a favorable antifungal response. Twenty patients with acute leukemia received combination therapy for fungal pneumonias arising during intensive chemotherapy treatments. Favorable responses were observed in 15 of these patients (75%), and antifungal response did not depend on the response of the underlying leukemia. Survival to hospital discharge was significantly better (P < 0.001) in patients having a favorable response. Mild to moderate nephrotoxicity was noted in 50% of patients, necessitating the substitution of liposomal amphotericin. Mild elevation of alkaline phosphatase levels occurred in 30% of patients. Caspofungin was temporarily withheld from one patient who developed moderate but reversible biochemical hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The antifungal combination of caspofungin and amphotericin can be administered safely to high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies. Although an absolute assessment of efficacy is limited by the design of this study, encouraging outcomes were noted for many patients. The authors plan to evaluate this regimen further in a randomized clinical trial.