REVISIT TO KAPOSFS VARICELLIFORM ERUPTION: ROLE OF IL-4

Background. Kaposi's varicelliform eruption (KVE) is characterized by disseminated cutaneous eruptions usually caused by infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). Kaposi's varicelliform eruption is commonly observed among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Why AD patients are prone to HSV infections is still an enigma. Recent findings suggest that an increased number of IL-4-secreting cells can be cloned from lesions of AD. Because IL-4 is a known Th1 cell inhibitor, theoretically, by inhibiting the Th1 cells, it could downregulate the immune response against HSV. In this study, we have evaluated the role of IL-4 on HSV replication. Methods. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 10 HSV seronegative and five seropositive healthy individuals were stimulated with PHA, recall antigen (tetanus toxoid), and HSV antigen in combination with IL-4 and anti-IL-4. Supernatants were assessed for interferon (IFN) gamma, IL-4 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and for anti-HSV effect. Anti-HSV effect was assessed by measuring inhibition of the cytopathic effect (CPE) of HSV on a Vero cell line. Results. Both seropositive and seronegative groups showed significant inhibition of IFN-gamma secretion with addition of IL-4 (P < .001, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and this effect could be neutralized by anti-IL-4. There was a direct relationship between the IFN-gamma concentration and the HSV cytopathic effect and an inverse relationship between IL-4 concentration and HSV CPE. Conclusions. This study provides evidence that IL-4 can enhance HSV infection. Therefore, it is conceivable that patients with conditions of increased activity of IL-4, as in ad, would be prone to extensive forms of HSV infection.     

The Effects of Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing Versus Ventricular Backup Pacing on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial rate-adaptive pacing may improve cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, single-crossover design enrolled dual-chamber implantable defibrillator recipients without pacing indications and an ejection fraction ≤40% to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill stress testing in both atrial rate-adaptive pacing (AAIR) and ventricular demand pacing (VVI) pacing modes. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂). Secondary endpoints were changes in anaerobic threshold, perceived exertion, exercise duration, and peak blood pressure.
Results: Ten patients, nine males, eight with New York Heart Association class I, mean ejection fraction 24 ± 7%, were analyzed. Baseline VO₂ was 3.6 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min. Heart rate at peak exercise was significantly higher during AAIR versus VVI pacing (142 ± 18 vs 130 ± 23 bpm; P = 0.05). However, there was no difference in peak VO₂ (AAIR 23.7 ± 6.1 vs VVI 23.8 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min; P = 0.8), anaerobic threshold (AAIR 1.3 ± 0.3 vs VVI 1.2 ± 0.2 L/min; P = 0.11), rate of perceived exertion (AAIR 7.3 ± 1.5 vs VVI 7.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.46), exercise duration (AAIR 15 minutes, 46 seconds ± 2 minutes, 54 seconds vs VVI 16 minutes, 3 seconds ± 2 minutes, 48 seconds; P = 0.38), or peak systolic blood pressure (AAIR 155 ± 22 vs VVI 153 ± 21; P = 0.61) between the two pacing modes.
Conclusion: In this study, AAIR pacing did not improve peak VO_2, anaerobic threshold, rate of perceived exertion, or exercise duration compared to VVI backup pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and no pacing indications.