Effects of tamoxifen on normal breast tissue histological composition: Results from a randomised six-arm placebo-controlled trial in healthy women

Tamoxifen prevents recurrence of breast cancer and is suggested for preventive risk-reducing therapy. Tamoxifen reduces mammographic density, a proxy for therapy response, but little is known about its effects in remodelling normal breast tissue. Our study, a substudy within the double-blinded dose-determination trial KARISMA, investigated tamoxifen-specific changes in breast tissue composition and histological markers in healthy women. We included 83 healthy women randomised to 6 months daily intake of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1 mg of tamoxifen or placebo. The groups were combined to “no dose” (0-1 mg), “low-dose” (2.5-5 mg) or “high-dose” (10-20 mg) of tamoxifen. Ultrasound-guided biopsies were collected before and after tamoxifen exposure. In each biopsy, epithelial, stromal and adipose tissues was quantified, and expression of epithelial and stromal Ki67, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) analysed. Mammographic density using STRATUS was measured at baseline and end-of-tamoxifen-exposure. We found that different doses of tamoxifen reduced mammographic density and glandular-epithelial area in premenopausal women and associated with reduced epithelium and increased adipose tissue. High-dose tamoxifen also decreased epithelial ER and PR expressions in premenopausal women. Premenopausal women with the greatest reduction in proliferation also had the greatest epithelial reduction. In postmenopausal women, high-dose tamoxifen decreased the epithelial area with no measurable density decrease. Tamoxifen at both low and high doses influences breast tissue composition and expression of histological markers in the normal breast. Our findings connect epithelial proliferation with tissue remodelling in premenopausal women and provide novel insights to understanding biological mechanisms of primary prevention with tamoxifen.     

Neuropsychological changes following electrical injury.

The clinical presentation of electrical injury commonly involves physical, cognitive, and emotional complaints. Neuropsychological studies, including case reports, have indicated that electrical injury (EI) survivors may experience a broad range of impaired neuropsychological functions, although this has not been clarified through controlled investigation. In this study, we describe the neuropsychological test findings in a series of 29 EI patients carefully screened and matched to a group of 29 demographically similar healthy electricians. Participants were matched by their estimated premorbid intellectual ability. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to assess group differences in the following neuropsychological domains: attention and mental speed, working memory, verbal memory, visual memory, and motor skills. EI patients performed significantly worse on composite measures of attention/mental speed and motor skills, which could not be explained by demographic differences, injury parameters, litigation status, or mood disturbance. Results suggest that cognitive changes do occur in patients suffering from electrical injury.     

Focal spasticity therapy with botulinum toxin: effects on function, activities of daily living and pain in 100 adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the effects of a comprehensive focal spasticity program in adult patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study of an out-patient cohort. PATIENTS: One hundred patients were enrolled in the study (54 men and 46 women, mean age 41 years (SD 14). Cerebral palsy and stroke were equally common (80% in total). The remaining patients had miscellaneous diagnoses, including traumatic brain injury. METHODS: On average 230 units (SD 101) of botulinum toxin A Botox was given for 227 principal therapy targets chosen by the patient or the caregiver. One patient could have several targets for therapy. Administration of botulinum toxin was combined with 260 additional therapeutic interventions, most of which were forms of physical therapy. The effects were assessed after 6 weeks and compared with baseline functional abilities 1-2 weeks prior to therapy. RESULTS: Improvement was observed for 211 (93%) therapy targets, no change in 15 (7%), and impairment in 1, corresponding to an overall improvement in 90 patients (90%), 9 unchanged (9%) and worsening in 1. Spasticity assessment (Ashworth scale 0-4; 30 patients) showed a statistically significant improvement (median at baseline was 3 vs 2 after therapy, mean difference 1.2, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Improvement was observed in >or=90% of patients and in their principal therapeutic targets in a cohort receiving their first focal spasticity treatment with botulinum toxin A and additional therapy. A strict strategy for patient selection and comprehensive management was followed.