Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

All surgical patients are at risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism or postphlebitic syndrome. The evolution of ultrasonographic imaging has increased the awareness of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Duplex imaging and Doppler color flow imaging have made the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis relatively simple, painless, inexpensive, and definitive. These procedures have gained acceptance by both patients and physicians. Several risk factors have been identified that increase the chance of the development of deep venous thrombosis. These factors include a history of deep venous thrombosis, presence of a malignant process, increasing age, cigarette smoking, obesity, prolonged bed rest, and general anesthesia. The greater the number of risk factors, the more aggressive prophylaxis should be. Means of prophylaxis have improved, and surgeons now generally agree that some form of prophylaxis is required. Heparin and intermittent compression devices appear to be equally effective in preventing deep venous thrombosis. The addition of venous monitoring in high-risk patients permits immediate identification of the presence of deep venous thrombosis. During the last decade, the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis has changed little. Heparin followed by warfarin remains the treatment of choice. A small group of patients receive fibrinolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis. Although the incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis has decreased during the last decade, it remains a significant complication.     

Acute cardiac and pulmonary arrest after infusion of vancomycin with subsequent desensitization

J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:853-4.     

Double-labelling with rhodamine beads and biocytin: a technique for studying corticospinal and other projection neurons in vitro

Corticospinal neurons retrogradely labelled with rhodamine-labelled latex microspheres (RLMs) in vivo were studied intracellularly in a slice preparation up to 13 months later with electrodes containing biocytin. The physiological properties of these double-labelled corticospinal neurons were indistinguishable from those of comparable neurons which were impaled with biocytin-containing electrodes without prior RLM-labelling, and neurons studied with potassium acetate-filled electrodes in similar areas. Thus, neither labelling with RLMs nor injection of biocytin affected neuronal properties. This important advantage of RLMs makes them suitable for prelabelling projection neurons in vivo for subsequent studies that take advantage of the versatility of a brain slice preparation. In addition to its lack of effects on neuronal properties, intracellular labelling with biocytin also provides high-quality morphological details ideal for anatomical analysis. The compatibility of retrograde labelling with RLMs and intracellular staining with biocytin make this a useful combined technique for tracking electrophysiological and anatomical changes in identified projection neurons over time.     

Ventromedial hypothalamus vs. lateral hypothalamic D2 satiety receptors in the body weight increase induced by systemic sulpiride

Two experiments were conducted in order to see if dopamine satiety receptors in the lateral hypothalamus or satiety mechanisms in the ventromedial hypothalamus were involved in the hyperphagia and body weight increase induced by systemic sulpiride. In the first experiment, it was shown that systemic sulpiride (20 mg/kg) does not block the anorexia caused by intraperifornical injections of amphetamine. In the second experiment, sulpiride (20 mg/kg during 18 days) did not produce an additional increase in body weight in previously VMH-lesioned female rats. This last fact cannot be explained by a ceiling effect since insulin (5 U/day during 7 days) increased body weight in the same VMH rats in which sulpiride was not effective. These results do not support the hypothesis that systemic sulpiride reaches the perifornical dopamine D2 receptors to disinhibit feeding, but suggest instead an involvement of the ventromedial hypothalamus. This last suggestion is more in agreement with the hypothesis that sulpiride alters feeding and body weight gain through the induction of a functional gonadectomy.     

Does there exist an obesity paradox in COVID-19? Insights of the international HOPE-COVID-19-registry

BackgroundObesity has been described as a protective factor in cardiovascular and other diseases being expressed as ‘obesity paradox’. However, the impact of obesity on clinical outcomes including mortality in COVID-19 has been poorly systematically investigated until now. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes among COVID-19 patients divided into three groups according to the body mass index (BMI).MethodsWe retrospectively collected data up to May 31^st, 2020. 3635 patients were divided into three groups of BMI (<25 kg/m²; n = 1110, 25?30 kg/m²; n = 1464, and >30 kg/m²; n = 1061). Demographic, in-hospital complications, and predictors for mortality, respiratory insufficiency, and sepsis were analyzed.ResultsThe rate of respiratory insufficiency was more recorded in BMI 25?30 kg/m² as compared to BMI < 25 kg/m² (22.8% vs. 41.8%; p < 0.001), and in BMI > 30 kg/m² than BMI < 25 kg/m², respectively (22.8% vs. 35.4%; p < 0.001). Sepsis was more observed in BMI 25?30 kg/m² and BMI > 30 kg/m² as compared to BMI < 25 kg/m², respectively (25.1% vs. 42.5%; p = 0.02) and (25.1% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.006). The mortality rate was higher in BMI 25?30 kg/m² and BMI > 30 kg/m² as compared to BMI < 25 kg/m², respectively (27.2% vs. 39.2%; p = 0.31) (27.2% vs. 33.5%; p = 0.004). In the Cox multivariate analysis for mortality, BMI < 25 kg/m² and BMI > 30 kg/m² did not impact the mortality rate (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.889?1.508; p = 0.27) (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.893?1.479; p = 0.27). In multivariate logistic regression analyses for respiratory insufficiency and sepsis, BMI < 25 kg/m² is determined as an independent predictor for reduction of respiratory insufficiency (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.538?1.004; p = 0.05).ConclusionsHOPE COVID-19-Registry revealed no evidence of obesity paradox in patients with COVID-19. However, Obesity was associated with a higher rate of respiratory insufficiency and sepsis but was not determined as an independent predictor for a high mortality.