Retroconduction Selective Recognition in Wide-Dipole Floating Atrial Sensing

Effective discrimination of retrogradely conducted P waves would allow distinguishing sinus tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardias due to A V or nodal reentry, and would prevent pacemaker-mediated tachycardia in AV sequential pacing. This might be especially relevant in VDD implants, where retroconduction could be induced by escape ventricular stimulation. In order to analyze the respective waveform properties, anterograde and retrograde atrial signals were recorded by a wide floating electrode dipole, on the implantation of a permanent single-pass lead for VDD pacing. Generally, bipolar recording did not allow reliable discrimination, while the signal nature could be readily diagnosed from the main features of the unipolar atrial electrograms. The unipolar waveform recorded under sinus rhythm in high right atrium, close to the superior vena cava opening (proximal EGM), started with a negative deflection in 88% of the patients. In 7% of the patients, the first deflection of the signal was positive in some cardiac cycles only, and, on the average, the amplitude of the positive phase was not higher than 5% of the signal peak-to-peak amplitude. Conversely, under retroconduction, the starting deflection attained higher positive values in 98% of the patients, being stably over 15% of the peak-to-peak amplitude in 86% of the cases. Furthermore, in 69% of the cases, the lag time between the onset of the negative deflection of proximal and distal (mid-low atrium) unipolar EGM changed unambiguously when retroconduction occurred, exceeding the range of variation observed in each patient during sinus activity. The combined evaluation of unipolar EGM shape and lag time allowed specific retroconduction recognition in 95% of the patients. We suggest that this approach may yield useful information for the discrimination of retrograde atrial signals, provided that the recording dipole is sufficiently long and the proximal electrode is properly positioned in the high right atrium.     

Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of a New SSIR Pacemaker

A multicenter clinical evaluation of Sorin Swing 100, a new SSIR pacemaker with a gravimetric sensor, was performed by seven different centers enrolling a total of 89 patients, 56 men and 33 women, mean age 73.1 years, for pacemaker implantion (73 patients) or pacemaker replacement (16 patients). Pacing mode was VVIR in 73 patients and AAIR in 16. The behavior of pacing rate was evaluated 3 months after the implant by performing a 24-hour Holter monitor, an exercise stress test, and tests for the assessment of mechanical external interference (MEI). A physiological behavior of the paced rate was always observed during Holter monitoring. In 52 completely paced patients mean diurnal, nocturnal, and maximal heart rate were, respectively, 74.9 ± 5.7 ppm, 58.1 ± 5.8 ppm, and 113.4 ± 12.7 ppm; a paced rate exceeding 100 ppm was reached on the average 5.6 times/Holter monitor. In all but two patients the sleep rate (55 ppm) was reached during the night or long resting time. During exercise stress test a direct correlation between the increase in pacing rate and the increase in workload was observed; the mean maximal heart rate reached in 49 completely paced patients was, respectively, 102.8 ± 9 ppm in 17 patients who accomplished stage 1, 116.2 ± 13.6 ppm in 28 patients who accomplished stage 2, and 133 ± 6.7 ppm in 10 patients who accomplished stage 3 of the Bruce protocol. MEI testing never increased the pacing rate over the noise rate (10 ppm over the basic rate). In only seven patients the results obtained suggested to change the nominal set up of the pacemaker. Our experience clearly indicates that Swing 100 is an effective, reliable, and easy to use SSIR pacemaker. The availability of the sleep rate allows a more physiological pattern of pacing rate and can lead to significant energy saving.     

Intrapatient Comparison of Atrial and Ventricular Sensing, Pacing Threshold, and Impedance: Benefits with Steroid-Eluting Leads

We compared the atrial and ventricular bioelectrical effects relating to pacing threshold, pacing impedance, and pacing energy in each of 58 patients to determine the importance of pacing impedance in safe low energy stimulations. The study was conducted during 4 years of follow-up. Of the 58 patients in our study, 31 were stimulated in both chambers with steroid-eluting leads (Capsure 4503 and 4003) and 27 with platinum electrode catheters (Target Tip 4511 and 4011). The two groups were homogeneous in sex, age, cardiopathy, and reason for implant. At 6 months, the mean impedance values for the Target Tip were: 358 ± 72 Ω for the atrium and 443 ± 87 Ω for the ventricle (P < 0.00002): after 1 year, atrium = 386 ± 77 Ω, ventricle = 439 ± 42 Ω (P < 0.04); at 2 years, atrium = 409 ± 86 Ω, ventricle = 510 ± 94 Ω (P < 0.0001); at 3 years, atrium = 428 ± 81 Ω, ventricle = 494 ± 67 Ω (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 424 ± 71 Ω and ventricle = 501 ± 69 Ω (P < 0.003). The mean impedance value (for the Capsure) was: atrium = 351 ± 43 Ω, ventricle = 431 ± 81 Ω at 6 months (P < 0.03); at 1 year, atrium = 359 ± 38 Ω, ventricle = 446 ± 83 Ω (P < 0.01); at 2 years, atrium = 304 ± 124 Ω, ventricle = 459 + 108 Ω (P <0.0003); at 3 years, atrium = 359 ± 108 Ω, ventricle = 461 ± 89 Ω (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 419 ± 133 Ω and ventricle = 515 ± 75 Ω (P < 0.03;. In view of the chronic threshold, low energy stimulation was used at follow-up. The mean low energy stimulation values programmed for Target Tip were: atrium = 2.5 V/0.35 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.30 ms; for Capsure, atrium = 2.5 V/0.25 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.25 ms. The mean stimulation energy value was 31% higher in the atrium than in the ventricle with Capsure leads, and 39% higher with Target Tip. Pacing impedance was lower in the atrium than in the ventricle with both leads. Energy consumption in the atrium is significantly greater than in the ventricle with both leads, particularly with Target Tip.     

Radiographic Assessment of Atrial Dipole Position in Single Pass Lead VDD and DDD Pacing

Atrial electrode position was determined by radiographic analysis in 160 patients paced in single-lead VDD for second- or third-degree A-V block, implanted > 1 year with Phymos single pass leads and Phymos 3D pacemakers. The pacing lead features an atrial dipole with a 30-mm electrode interspace. In 44% of patients, the upper atrial electrode was positioned within a band of 20 mm centered at the level of the superior vena caval insertion (junctional area) and was in the inferior vena cava or in the atrium in 35% and 21 % of cases, respectively. In spite of these different dipole locations, all patients had stable atrium-driven pacing at routine follow-up visits. With the electrode in the junctional area, unipolar stimulation of up to 5 V for 1 ms resulted in stable atrial capture in 63% and 59% of the patients in supine and upright positions, respectively. With the electrode in the atrium, corresponding success rates were 45% and 54%. In the atrium, however, the prevalence of diaphragmatic stimulation was significantly lower than at the junction (10% vs 42% in supine position; 21 % vs 47% upright). Though atrial sensing function proved adequate in a wide range of positions, these results suggest that the Phymos lead atrial dipole should be positioned within the atrium, as close as possible to the atrial wall, to maximize the number of VDD patients who might benefit from single-lead DDD pacing.     

Italian Experience with AutoCapture in Conjunction with a Membrane Lead

AutoCapture(tm) is a programmable feature of the Pacesetter Microny(tm) SB+2425T VVIR pacemaker, which provides for the automatic capture verification, increase in output in the presence of noncapture and threshold searching, with adjustment of output settings. The effectiveness of this unit in conjunction with the Membrane(tm) models 1400 T and 1401 T bipolar endocardial leads was studied in 54 patients followed at 19 Italian Centers. The patients were randomized at the time of implantation to receive either the model 1400 T or the 1401 T lead. The electrodes in these leads are covered by a Nafion membrane, which was either impregnated (model 1400T) or not-impregnated (model 1401 T) with steroid. This paper reports the data collected over the first six weeks postimplantation. The results of the automatic capture function was compared to the capture threshold measured using the Vario(tm) technique at the time of predischarge evaluations, and weeks 1, 2, and 6 of postimplant follow-up. The reliability and effectiveness of the pulse generator-lead system allowed for consistent pacing at very low outputs and safety preserved at a programmed output only 0.3 V above the capture threshold.