排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
2.
Beth Wathen MSN RN PNP CCRN-K Heidi L. McNeely MSN RN PCNS-BC Christine Peyton MSN CPNP-AC Zhaoxing Pan PhD Robin Thomas BSN RN CCRN Cayla Callahan BSN RN CCRN Sara Fidanza MSN RN CNS-BC CPNP-PC James Brown BSN RN CPN Madalynn Neu PhD RN FAAN 《Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing》2021,26(4):e12338
3.
Janet K. Holzhauer PCNS-BC Vicky Reith MS CNS-BC CEN Kathleen J. Sawin DNS CPNP-PC FAAN Kenneth Yen MD MS 《Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing》2009,14(4):239-244
PURPOSE. This study aims to determine whether temporal artery (TA) thermometer readings are accurate and better tolerated than rectal readings in young children.
DESIGN AND METHODS. Paired rectal and TA temperature readings and Face Legs Activity Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scores were obtained.
RESULTS. TA thermometry failed to detect rectal fever (38°C or greater) in approximately 20% of paired temperature readings. FLACC scores were significantly lower after TA readings than after rectal readings.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS. This study questions TA readings as an accurate substitute for rectal thermometry. 相似文献
DESIGN AND METHODS. Paired rectal and TA temperature readings and Face Legs Activity Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scores were obtained.
RESULTS. TA thermometry failed to detect rectal fever (38°C or greater) in approximately 20% of paired temperature readings. FLACC scores were significantly lower after TA readings than after rectal readings.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS. This study questions TA readings as an accurate substitute for rectal thermometry. 相似文献
1