Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease and other disorders associated with dementia: EFNS guideline

The aim of this international guideline on dementia was to present a peer-reviewed evidence-based statement for the guidance of practice for clinical neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists, and other specialist physicians responsible for the care of patients with dementia. It covers major aspects of diagnostic evaluation and treatment, with particular emphasis on the type of patient often referred to the specialist physician. The main focus is Alzheimer's disease, but many of the recommendations apply to dementia disorders in general. The task force working group considered and classified evidence from original research reports, meta-analysis, and systematic reviews, published before January 2006. The evidence was classified and consensus recommendations graded according to the EFNS guidance. Where there was a lack of evidence, but clear consensus, good practice points were provided. The recommendations for clinical diagnosis, blood tests, neuroimaging, electroencephalography (EEG), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, genetic testing, tissue biopsy, disclosure of diagnosis, treatment of Alzheimer's disease, and counselling and support for caregivers were all revised when compared with the previous EFNS guideline. New recommendations were added for the treatment of vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies, for monitoring treatment, for treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia, and for legal issues. The specialist physician plays an important role together with primary care physicians in the multidisciplinary dementia teams, which have been established throughout Europe. This guideline may contribute to the definition of the role of the specialist physician in providing dementia health care.     

Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI in dementia with Lewy bodies

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) on MRI is less frequent in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) compared with AD and vascular dementia (VaD), and to determine the diagnostic utility of MTA in the differential diagnosis of dementia. METHOD: Coronal T1-weighted 1.0-T MR images were acquired in patients with DLB (consensus criteria; n = 26; mean age, 75.9 years), AD (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association; n = 28; mean age, 77.4 years), VaD (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences; n = 24; mean age, 76.9 years), and normal control subjects (n = 26; mean age, 76.2 years). Cognitive function was assessed using the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), and MTA was rated visually using a standardized scale. RESULTS: MTA was more frequent and severe in all dementia groups compared with control subjects (AD, 100%; VaD, 88%; DLB, 62%; control subjects, 4%; p < 0.001). Comparing dementia groups, MTA scores were significantly lower in DLB than AD (p = 0.002), with a trend toward less atrophy in DLB compared with VaD (p = 0.07). The absence of MTA had a specificity of 100% and 88% for separating DLB from AD and VaD respectively, and a sensitivity of 38%. In patients with DLB, MTA increased with age (r = 0.58, p = 0.002), and in all dementia patients MTA correlated with memory impairment (combined memory score, r = -0.34, p = 0.003) but not total CAMCOG score or other subscales. CONCLUSION: Patients with DLB have significantly greater MTA than control subjects but significantly less than those with AD. The authors confirmed that the presence of MTA is useful in detecting AD but less useful in differentiating between dementias. However, in the differentiation of DLB from AD and VaD, the absence of MTA is highly suggestive of a diagnosis of DLB.     

Prospective validation of consensus criteria for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of a clinical diagnosis of probable or possible dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) made using International Consensus criteria. BACKGROUND: Validation studies based on retrospective chart reviews of autopsy-confirmed cases have suggested that diagnostic specificity for DLB is acceptable but case detection rates as low as 0.22 have been suggested. METHODS: We evaluated the first 50 cases reaching neuropathologic autopsy in a cohort to which Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for DLB, National Institute for Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria for AD, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria for vascular dementia (VaD) had been prospectively applied. RESULTS: Twenty-six clinical diagnoses of DLB, 19 of AD, and 5 of VaD were made. At autopsy, 29 DLB cases, 15 AD, 5 VaD, and 1 progressive supranuclear palsy were identified. The sensitivity and specificity of a clinical diagnosis of probable DLB in this sample were 0.83 and 0.95. Of the five cases receiving a false-negative diagnosis of DLB, significant fluctuation was present in four but visual hallucinations and spontaneous motor features of parkinsonism were generally absent. Thirty-one percent of the DLB cases had additional vascular pathology and in two cases this contributed to a misdiagnosis of VaD. No correlations were found between the distribution of Lewy bodies and clinical features. CONCLUSION: The Consensus criteria for DLB performed as well in this prospective study as those for AD and VaD, with a diagnostic sensitivity substantially higher than that reported by previous retrospective studies. DLB occurs in the absence of extrapyramidal features and in the presence of comorbid cerebrovascular disease. Fluctuation is an important diagnostic indicator, reliable measures of which need to be developed further.     

One year follow-up of parkinsonism in dementia with Lewy bodies

The progression of parkinsonism over 1 year was evaluated in a prospective cohort of patients (n = 338), suffering from dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Alzheimer's disease (AD) or vascular dementia (VaD). Parkinsonism was assessed using the modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Significant parkinsonism was significantly commoner in DLB sufferers (71%) than amongst patients with AD (7%) or VaD (10%). DLB patients with established parkinsonism had an annual increase in severity of 9%, but progression was more rapid (49% in 1 year) in patients with early parkinsonism. Parkinsonism was frequent at all severities in DLB patients, but usually only present in other dementias when MMSE <10.     

Neuropathological substrates of dementia and depression in vascular dementia, with a particular focus on cases with small infarct volumes

The neuropathological substrates of dementia and depression were evaluated in 30 patients with cerebrovascular disease and significant cognitive impairment (VaD), with a particular focus on patients with small infarct volumes (<15 ml). VaD patients with small infarct volumes had a similar degree of cognitive impairment to those with larger infarct volumes (>15 ml) but were significantly more likely to be depressed and to have areas of microinfarction. A review of individual cases with small infarct volumes suggested that the combination of microinfarction, diffuse white matter disease and perivascular changes, or the overlap of neurodegenerative pathologies and microvascular changes were particularly important. Microinfarction was also significantly associated with major depression.     

α-Synuclein phosphorylation at serine 129 occurs after initial protein deposition and inhibits seeded fibril formation and toxicity

α-Synuclein (α-syn) phosphorylation at serine 129 (pS129–α-syn) is substantially increased in Lewy body disease, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). However, the pathogenic relevance of pS129–α-syn remains controversial, so we sought to identify when pS129 modification occurs during α-syn aggregation and its role in initiation, progression and cellular toxicity of disease. Using diverse aggregation assays, including real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) on brain homogenates from PD and DLB cases, we demonstrated that pS129–α-syn inhibits α-syn fibril formation and seeded aggregation. We also identified lower seeding propensity of pS129–α-syn in cultured cells and correspondingly attenuated cellular toxicity. To build upon these findings, we developed a monoclonal antibody (4B1) specifically recognizing nonphosphorylated S129–α-syn (WT–α-syn) and noted that S129 residue is more efficiently phosphorylated when the protein is aggregated. Using this antibody, we characterized the time-course of α-syn phosphorylation in organotypic mouse hippocampal cultures and mice injected with α-syn preformed fibrils, and we observed aggregation of nonphosphorylated α-syn followed by later pS129–α-syn. Furthermore, in postmortem brain tissue from PD and DLB patients, we observed an inverse relationship between relative abundance of nonphosphorylated α-syn and disease duration. These findings suggest that pS129–α-syn occurs subsequent to initial protein aggregation and apparently inhibits further aggregation. This could possibly imply a potential protective role for pS129–α-syn, which has major implications for understanding the pathobiology of Lewy body disease and the continued use of reduced pS129–α-syn as a measure of efficacy in clinical trials.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are both associated with underlying Lewy body disease, which represents the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease (1, 2). The neuropathological hallmark of Lewy body disease is the intracellular aggregation of the protein α-synuclein (α-syn) into spherical cytoplasmic inclusions, termed Lewy bodies, but are also observed in neuronal processes as Lewy neurites (LNs) (3).α-Syn is thought to play a central role in the pathobiology of Lewy body disease. Single-point mutations and genetic modifications affecting α-syn expression—through duplications, triplications, or polymorphisms in its promoter—have been linked to both idiopathic and familial forms of Lewy body disease (4–6). Nevertheless, neuropathological studies utilizing pan–α-syn antibodies, recognizing both physiological and pathological forms of the protein, do not consistently report a relationship between the load of Lewy body pathology and clinical disease severity (2). To reconcile the apparent importance of α-syn in Lewy body disease with the difficulty relating Lewy body burdens in the brain to phenotypic severity, continued research has focused on the identification of particularly disease-relevant forms of α-syn. α-Syn undergoes various posttranslational modifications (PTMs)—including acetylation, nitration, ubiquitination, and glycosylation and phosphorylation at serine 129 (pS129)—increases from ∼4% under physiological conditions to 90% in Lewy body disease, suggesting it is associated with the disease state (7–9).Previous studies have reported that pS129 enhances intracellular aggregate formation in SH-SY5Y cells (10), and mediates cell death through activation of the unfolded protein response pathway (11). Furthermore, studies in rodent models have suggested that pS129 exacerbates the rate of pathological protein aggregation and deposition, with subsequent negative effects on neuronal functioning (12). However, these studies are counterbalanced by others reporting a potentially neuroprotective function of phosphorylation in animal models (13, 14) and cellular model systems (15). Additionally, studies have reported neutral findings regarding pS129 modification as neither enhancing nor diminishing cellular toxicity and α-syn aggregation (16, 17). Despite the uncertain pathogenic role of pS129 in Lewy body disease, antibodies against pS129 are widely used, based on the putative view that they label a species of α-syn that is particularly disease-relevant. These studies often employ pS129–α-syn as a marker of the abundance of protein inclusions to stage disease severity and evaluate the relationship between its abundance and important clinical or pathological variables, such as disease duration, phenotypic severity, or cell loss (18). Such studies typically identify that pS129 abundance throughout the brain correlates with disease severity (19–21), though it remains uncertain whether phosphorylation precedes protein aggregation or occurs secondarily to deposition of nonphosphorylated α-syn, and whether pS129 is a key driver of pathogenicity or simply a useful marker of a neurodegenerative process (22, 23). Therefore, although there is a substantial literature on pS129 in Lewy body disease, there is continued controversy regarding its potential contribution to disease states, with numerous studies reporting discordant findings. Despite contradictory findings regarding the disease-relevance of pS129, it is widely viewed as a particularly disease-associated modification, thus necessitating further research to address its importance for Lewy body disease.To address the key questions regarding the pathogenic relevance of pS129–α-syn, the present study aimed to undertake a comprehensive and multidisciplinary project to address this important and pressing question. The key aim of the study was to better understand the role of pS129 in the natural history of Lewy body disease, by determining when pS129 occurs in the development of α-syn aggregates and how it affects the aggregation-propensity and cytotoxicity of α-syn     

A randomised, placebo controlled, comparative trial of the gastrointestinal safety and efficacy of AZD3582 versus naproxen in osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the gastrointestinal safety and efficacy of the COX inhibiting nitric oxide donator AZD3582 in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: 970 patients were randomised (7:7:2) to AZD3582 750 mg twice daily, naproxen 500 mg twice daily, or placebo twice daily in a double blind study. The primary end point was the six week incidence of endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcers (diameter > or =3 mm). Overall damage measured on the Lanza scale was a secondary end point. Safety and tolerability assessments included endoscopic upper gastrointestinal erosions and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). Efficacy was primarily assessed by WOMAC. RESULTS: The incidence of ulcers with AZD3582 was 9.7% and with naproxen 13.7% (p = 0.07, NS), v 0% on placebo. The incidence of Lanza scores >2 was higher with naproxen (43.7%) than with AZD3582 (32.2%) (p<0.001). Compared with baseline, significantly fewer ulcers and erosions developed in stomach and stomach/duodenum combined, and fewer erosions developed in stomach, duodenum, and both combined on AZD3582 than on naproxen. GSRS reflux and abdominal pain subscale scores were lower for AZD3582 than for naproxen but there was no difference for indigestion, constipation, and diarrhoea. AZD3582 was as effective as naproxen at improving WOMAC scores. Both agents were well tolerated, with no significant effects on blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: At doses with similar efficacy in relieving osteoarthritis symptoms, the primary end point of six week endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcer incidence was not significantly different between AZD3582 and naproxen. Most secondary endoscopic gastrointestinal end points favoured AZD3582.