Keeping the focus on children: the challenges of safeguarding children affected by domestic abuse

Safeguarding children affected by domestic abuse is a key responsibility for all professionals working with children and families, but can be difficult to achieve in practice. Despite a policy emphasis on early intervention and child‐centred work, limited attention has been paid to how professionals in universal and additional support services address this important area of work. This paper reports findings from qualitative research undertaken in one local authority area in the north of England during 2011 which examines the challenges facing professionals in safeguarding children affected by domestic abuse. Six mixed professional focus groups were held, attended by a total of 23 participants. Discussion focused upon participants’ awareness of domestic abuse, how they assessed and met children and young peoples’ needs, and their views about service provision and safeguarding processes. Data were transcribed and thematic analysis undertaken. The themes presented in this paper – embodied recognition, someone else's job, service gaps, skills deficits, and focusing upon children and young people – illustrate the scope and limitations of professionals’ work with children and young people affected by domestic abuse. Areas for practice improvement are discussed.     

Nutrient-specific modulation of gastric mechanosensitivity in patients with functional dyspepsia

Intraduodenal lipid infusion induces symptoms and increases sensitivity to gastric distension in patients with functional dyspepsia. To test whether these effects are specific for lipid, we compared the effects of intraduodenal infusions of either lipid or glucose on symptoms and gastric sensory and motor responses to gastric distension. Eighteen dyspeptic patients and nine controls were studied. The stomach was distended with a flaccid bag during isocaloric infusions (1 kcal/ml) of saline and either 10% Intralipid (nine patients) or 26.7% glucose (nine patients) into the duodenum. Dyspeptic symptoms and sensory thresholds for epigastric fullness and discomfort were assessed. Gastric pressure profiles during distensions were similar during lipid and glucose infusions in patients and controls, but both were significantly lower than during saline infusion. Lower volumes were required to induce fullness and discomfort in the patients compared with the controls. In the controls, the threshold volumes required to induce fullness and discomfort were greater during infusion of lipid and glucose than during saline infusion, but in the patients, the threshold volumes were increased during glucose infusion but further reduced during lipid infusion. Moreover, in the patients, nausea was more common during lipid than glucose infusion and did not occur during saline. The controls did not experience any symptoms during any infusion. In conclusion, intraduodenal lipid but not glucose sensitizes the stomach to distension in patients with functional dyspepsia but not in controls.     

Room for improvement? Leadership,innovation culture and uptake of quality improvement methods in general practice

Background Leadership and innovation are currently seen as essential elements for the development and maintenance of high‐quality care. Little is known about the relationship between leadership and culture of innovation and the extent to which quality improvement methods are used in general practice. This study aimed to assess the relationship between leadership behaviour, culture of innovation and adoption of quality improvement methods in general practice. Method Self‐administered postal questionnaires were sent to general practitioner quality improvement leads in one county in the UK between June and December 2007. The questionnaire consisted of background information, a 12‐item scale to assess leadership behaviour, a seven‐dimension self‐rating scale for culture of innovation and questions on current use of quality improvement tools and techniques. Results Sixty‐three completed questionnaires (62%) were returned. Leadership behaviours were not commonly reported. Most practices reported a positive culture of innovation, featuring relationship most strongly, followed by targets and information but rated lower on other dimensions of rewards, risk and resources. There was a significant positive correlation between leadership behaviour and the culture of innovation (r = 0.57; P < 0.001). Apart from clinical audit and significant event analysis, quality improvement methods were not adopted by most participating practices. Conclusions Leadership behaviours were infrequently reported and this was associated with a limited culture of innovation in participating general practices. There was little use of quality improvement methods beyond clinical and significant event audit. Practices need support to enhance leadership skills, encourage innovation and develop quality improvement skills if improvements in health care are to accelerate.