Aortic root dimensions as a correlate for aortic regurgitation’s severity

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging - To evaluate the prevalence of aortic regurgitation (AR) and associations between the individual aortic root components and AR severity in the...     

The association between coffee consumption and periodontitis: a cross-sectional study of a northern German population

Clinical Oral Investigations - Positive and negative influences on oral health are attributed to coffee consumption. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the association between coffee...     

Transthoracic echocardiographic reference values of the aortic root: results from the Hamburg City Health Study

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging - Here we generate up-to-date reference values of transthoracic echocardiographic aortic root dimensions matched by sex, age, and body surface...     

Acute lesion extension following pulmonary vein isolation with two novel single shot devices: Pulsed field ablation versus multielectrode radiofrequency balloon

Introduction

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and the multielectrode radiofrequency balloon (RFB) are two novel ablation technologies to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). It is currently unknown whether these technologies differ in lesion formation and lesion extent. We compared the acute lesion extent after PVI induced by PFA and RFB by measuring low-voltage area in high-density maps and the release of biomolecules reflecting cardiac injury.

Methods

PVI was performed with a pentaspline catheter (FARAPULSE) applying PFA or with the compliant multielectrode RFB (HELIOSTAR). Before and after PVI high-density mapping with CARTO 3 was performed. In addition, blood samples were taken before transseptal puncture and after post-PVI remapping and serum concentrations of high-sensitive Troponin I were quantified by immunoassay.

Results

Sixty patients undergoing PVI by PFA (n = 28, age 69 ± 12 year, 60% males, 39.3% persistent atrial fibrillation [AF]) or RFB (n = 32, age 65 ± 13 year, 53% males, 21.9% persistent AF) were evaluated. Acute PVI was achieved in all patients in both groups. Mean number of PFA pulses was 34.2 ± 4.5 and mean number RFB applications was 8.5 ± 3 per patient. Total posterior ablation area was significantly larger in PFA (20.7 ± 7.7 cm²) than in RFB (7.1 ± 2.09 cm²; p < .001). Accordingly, posterior ablation area for each PV resulted in larger lesions after PFA versus RFB (LSPV 5.2 ± 2.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², LIPV 5.5 ± 2.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², RSPV 4.7 ± 1.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5 cm², RIPV 5.3 ± 2.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 cm,² respectively; p < .001). In a subset of 38 patients, increase of hsTropI was higher after PFA (625 ± 138 pg/mL, n = 28) versus RFB (148 ± 36 pg/mL, n = 10; p = .049) supporting the evidence of larger lesion extent by PFA.

Conclusion

PFA delivers larger acute lesion areas and higher troponin release upon successful PVI than multielectrode RFB-based PVI in this single-center series.