Improving Lesbian,Gay, Bisexual,Transgender, Queer and Two-Spirit Content in a Radiation Therapy Undergraduate Curriculum

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and two-spirit plus (LGBTQ2S+) people have distinct healthcare needs that may be unaddressed in many undergraduate healthcare curricula. The Radiation Therapy Program (RADTH) at the University of Alberta underwent a review of the three-year didactic curriculum using an online survey. The survey sought to ascertain if, where and how topics related to LGBTQ2S + healthcare are taught. Results indicated that out of 10 RADTH program faculty respondents, three teach related topics. The total time dedicated within the three-year curriculum was approximately three and a half hours. Other findings showed that faculty are interested in receiving more education in this area and would favour discussions about how to incorporate these themes into appropriate courses. This preliminary investigation demonstrated that there has been some initial work in this area, but there is more to be done.     

How does measurement of platelet P-selectin compare with other methods of measuring platelet function as a means of determining the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy?

Measurement of P-selectin on activated platelets as a means of measuring platelet function utilizing the technology described here has the advantage of not requiring immediate access to specialist equipment and expertise. Blood samples are activated, fixed, stored, and transported to a central laboratory for flow cytometric analysis. Here we have compared P-selectin with other more traditional approaches to measuring platelet function in blood and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from patients with acute coronary syndromes on treatment for at least 1 month with either aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin with prasugrel. The comparators were light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and Multiplate aggregometry (for determining the effects of aspirin) and LTA, VerifyNow and Multiplate together with the BioCytex VASP phosphorylation assay (for the P2Y₁₂ antagonists). The P-selectin Aspirin Test revealed substantial inhibition of platelet function in all but three of 96 patients receiving aspirin with clopidogrel and in none of 51 patients receiving aspirin and prasugrel. The results were very similar to those obtained using LTA. There was only one patient with high residual platelet aggregation and low P-selectin expression. The same patients identified as “non-responders” to aspirin also presented with the highest residual platelet activity as measured using the VerifyNow system, although not quite as well separated from the other values. With the Multiplate test only one of these patients clearly stood out from the others. The results obtained using the P-selectin P2Y₁₂ Test in 102 patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel were similar to the more traditional approaches in that a wide scatter of results was obtained. Generally, high values seen with the P-selectin P2Y₁₂ Test were also high with the LTA, VerifyNow, Multiplate, and BioCytex VASP P2Y₁₂ Tests. Similarly, low residual platelet function using the P2Y₁₂ test was seen irrespective of the testing procedure used. However, there were differences in some patients. Prasugrel was always more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet function with none of 56 patients (P-selectin and VerifyNow), only 2 of 56 patients (Multiplate) and only 3 of 56 patients (Biocytex VASP) demonstrating high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) defined using previously published cut-off values. The exception was LTA where there were 11 of 56 patients with HRPR. It remains to be seen which experimental approach provides the most useful information regarding outcomes after adjusting therapies in treated patients.     

Significance of lung contusion in mortality following polytrauma. Possibilities for therapeutic influence

Multiple trauma is often associated with blunt thoracic injuries. Especially lung contusion can result in respiratory insufficiency and therefore a higher mortality rate. In our prospective study comparing 8 multiple trauma patients with and without associated lung contusion, we found that respiratory function was already significantly disturbed (decrease of paO2/FiO2 and increase of AaDO2, a rise in extravascular lung water (EVLW) both early after trauma and also with a second peak following the 4th day. This group (LK) developed significantly more cases of respiratory distress (ARDS). The disturbance of respiratory function seen initially was interpreted as a consequence of the direct mechanical impact, leading to the formation of interstitial fluid and hematoma. The frequent development of ARDS in the LK-group probably results from a pronounced activation of cellular and humoral mechanisms and therefore an enforced injury of the pulmonary capillary bed. A significant increase of pulmonary infections or the development of sepsis was not seen in the LK-group and is probably not responsible for the higher ARDS-rate in this group.     

Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Radiotherapy for Painful Plantar Heel Spurs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The efficacy of radiation treatment (RT) for plantar heel pain has been reported repeatedly. Yet, the results referring to the pain relief rate, to long-term effects and prognostic factors are not consistent. In this paper, the effectiveness (pain relief rate and long-term results) and prognostic factors of RT for plantar heel pain have been investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to October 2000, 62 patients (73 heels) with painful plantar heel spurs and a minimum pain history of 3 months were treated and evaluated in a prospective study. Mean age was 54 years (range 28-84 years). All patients were treated with a total dose of 5 Gy in seven fractions (= one series), given twice a week at a single-dose sequence of 0.25-0.25-0.5-1.0-1.0-1.0-1.0 Gy (10-MV photons, source-skin distance [SSD] 100 cm, direct portal, field size 12 x 17 cm). The mean duration of heel pain before RT was 26 weeks (= 6.5 months; range 3-120 months). By means of a visual analog scale (VAS) the patients had to self-assess the quantity of their heel pain once before, three times during and four times after RT at a longterm median follow-up of 28 and 40 months. Additionally, the patients had to assess their mechanical heel stress extent during RT. Effectiveness was estimated according to the patients' judgment of pain reduction. RESULTS: A significant reduction of heel pain extent measured by VAS has been observed already during the RT series (before RT: 6.3 +/- 1.5 vs. 3.8 +/- 2.1 at the end of RT; p < 0.001). 6 weeks after RT (FU 1) pain reduction (> 20%) was achieved in 60 heels (82.3%; n = 73), in 64 heels (91.4%; n = 70) after a mean follow-up of 28 months (FU 2), and in 61 heels (89.7%; n = 68) after a mean follow-up of 40 months (FU 3), respectively. Sufficient pain relief (> 80% compared to initial extent) was observed in 18/73 heels (24.6%) at FU 1 (FU 2: 42/70; 60.0%; FU 3: 37/68; 54.4%), including 13/73 heels (17.8%) with complete pain relief (FU 2: 39/70; 55.7%; FU 3: 36/68; 52.9%). Partial improvement (50-80% pain reduction) was observed in 27/73 heels (37.0%) at FU 1 (FU 2: 14/70; 20.0%; FU 3: 15/68; 22.1%), and minor partial improvement (20-50% pain reduction) in 15/73 heels (20.5%) at FU 1 (FU 2: 8/70; 11.4%; FU 3: 9/68; 13.2%), respectively. No change was seen in 13/73 heels (17.8%) at FU 1 (FU 2: 6/70; 8.6%; FU 3: 7/68; 10.3%). Older patients (p = 0.04) and patients who avoided heel stress during the period of RT (p < 0.01) demonstrated a better short-term response (FU 1); both effects were lost 28 and 40 months after RT. Moreover, significant differences in the extent of heel pain reduction by RT were observed in dependence on previous pain duration (at FU 2-3). CONCLUSION: The results confirm the high efficacy of RT in painful plantar spur and add new aspects to formerly published data concerning the time course of changes in heel pain reduction. Pain relief can be expected during and shortly after RT. In addition, the initial success can be transformed into effective long-term results > 2 years after RT; however, further improvement is not to be expected. As a new prognostic factor, the reduction of mechanical heel stress during RT may ameliorate the short-term results, whereas short heel pain history improves the long-term results. Especially for older patients, RT should be taken into consideration as primary treatment.     

Love and Justice in the Family

The Patient in the Family: An Ethics of Medicine and Families. By Hilde Lindemann Nelson and James Lindemann Nelson.     

β受体阻断剂用于预防肝硬化患者出现胃食管静脉曲张

背景:非选择性β受体阻断剂能够降低门静脉压力和预防静脉曲张出血,但其能否预防静脉血管曲张尚不清楚。方法:对213例肝硬化门静脉高压患者犤最小门静脉压力梯度(H VPG)为6m m H g犦进行随机分组:其中108例接受噻吗洛尔(一种非选择性β受体阻断剂)治疗,105例接受安慰剂治疗。主     

Is there a place for gastroenterostomy in patients with advanced cancer of the head of the pancreas?

There remains doubt about the need for gastroenterostomy in patients with advanced cancer of the pancreatic head, performed either prophylactically or when passage of food becomes impossible. The records of 142 patients admitted for advanced pancreatic cancer to the Erasmus University Hospital over a period of 11 years were reviewed. We concentrated especially on the pre- and postoperative intake of food in cases involving gastroenterostomy and the morbidity and mortality associated with abdominal surgery in these patients. Of 129 patients without symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction at the time of diagnosis, 31 underwent prophylactic gastroenterostomy. The procedure did not prevent gastric outlet obstruction in 4 patients. Of the remaining 98 patients, 15 developed gastric outlet obstruction. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant difference in the interval to the occurrence of a symptomatic obstruction between these two groups, taking into account other covariables. Postoperative complications and mortality regarding a gastroenterostomy were high, ranging from 9% to 41% and 11% to 33%, respectively. Our results do not indicate that prophylactic gastroenterostomy may significantly prevent future gastric outlet obstruction; therefore, as it also increases morbidity, it should not be performed. A gastroenterostomy to relieve symptoms should be considered carefully, as the success rate is low and is accompanied by a considerable incidence of morbidity and mortality.

---

Resumen Persiste la duda sobre la necesidad de practicar gastroenterostomía en pacientes con cáncer avanzado de la cabeza del páncreas, así sea profiláctica o en presencia de obstrucción al paso de los alimentos. Se revisaron las historias de 142 pacientes con cáncer avanzado de la cabeza del páncreas en el Hospital de la Universidad de Erasmo observados en un periodo de 11 años. El estudio se concentré especialmente sobre la ingesta pre y postoperatoria de alimentos en los pacientos con gastroenterostomía y en la morbilidad y mortalidad asociada con la cirugía abdominal. De 129 pacientes libres de síntomas de obstrucción en el momento del diagnóstico, 31 fueron sometidos a gastroenterostomía profiláctica; el procedimiento no logró prevenir la obstrucción gástrica en 4 casos. De los 98 pacientes restantes, 15 desarrollaron obstrucción gástrico. El análisis proporcional de Cox no demostró diferencia significativa en el intervalo transcurrido hasta la aparición de los sintomas entre los dos grupos, tomando en consideración diversas variables. Las tasas de complicaciones y de mortalidad postoperatoria en relación con la gastroenterostomía fueron elevadas, 9–41% y 11–33%, respectivamente. Nuestros resultados no indican que la gastroenterostomía profiláctica pueda prevenir la obstrucción gástrica y, por cuanto incrementa la morbilidad, no debe ser realizada. La gastroenterostomía por razones de sintomatologia debe ser cuidadosamente considerada, puesto que la tasa de éxito es baja y se acompana de considerable morbilidad y mortalidad.

---

Résumé Réaliser une gastroentérostomie de faÇon prophylactique ou seulement lorsque l'alimentation devient impossible chez un patient ayant un cancer de la tÊte du pancréas reste une question sans réponse. Les dossiers de 142 patients ayant un cancer avancé de la tÊte du pancréas, observés à l'HÔpital Universitaire Erasmus en l'espace de 11 ans, ont été revus. Nous avons noté la possibilité d'alimentation en périodes préet postopératoire ainsi que la morbidité et mortalité en rapport avec la chirurgie chez ces patients. Des 129 patients n'ayant pas de symptÔmes d'obstruction postpylorique au moment du diagnostic, 31 ont eu une gastroentérostomie à titre prophylactique. Cette intervention n'a pu prévenir l'obstruction chez 4 de ces patients. Des 98 autres patients, 15 ont développé une obstruction postpylorique. Une analyse multifactorielle selon le modèle de Cox n'a pu démontrer de différence significative entre les deux groupes pour l'intervalle entre le moment du diagnostic et la survenue de l'obstruction. Le taux de complications et de décès postopératoires après gastroentérostomie était élevée, variant respectivement entre 9% et 41% et 11% et 33%. Nos résultats indiquent que la gastroentérostomie à titre prophylactique ne prévient pas la survenue d'une obstruction postpylorique mais qu'elle accroÎt la morbidité. Dans ces conditions, la gastroentérostomie ne devrait Être réalisée qu'en cas d'obstruction symptomatique, mais en sachant qu'elle n'est pas toujours couronnée de succès et que les taux de mortalité et de morbidité ne sont pas nuls.