Effects of tamoxifen on normal breast tissue histological composition: Results from a randomised six-arm placebo-controlled trial in healthy women

Tamoxifen prevents recurrence of breast cancer and is suggested for preventive risk-reducing therapy. Tamoxifen reduces mammographic density, a proxy for therapy response, but little is known about its effects in remodelling normal breast tissue. Our study, a substudy within the double-blinded dose-determination trial KARISMA, investigated tamoxifen-specific changes in breast tissue composition and histological markers in healthy women. We included 83 healthy women randomised to 6 months daily intake of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1 mg of tamoxifen or placebo. The groups were combined to “no dose” (0-1 mg), “low-dose” (2.5-5 mg) or “high-dose” (10-20 mg) of tamoxifen. Ultrasound-guided biopsies were collected before and after tamoxifen exposure. In each biopsy, epithelial, stromal and adipose tissues was quantified, and expression of epithelial and stromal Ki67, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) analysed. Mammographic density using STRATUS was measured at baseline and end-of-tamoxifen-exposure. We found that different doses of tamoxifen reduced mammographic density and glandular-epithelial area in premenopausal women and associated with reduced epithelium and increased adipose tissue. High-dose tamoxifen also decreased epithelial ER and PR expressions in premenopausal women. Premenopausal women with the greatest reduction in proliferation also had the greatest epithelial reduction. In postmenopausal women, high-dose tamoxifen decreased the epithelial area with no measurable density decrease. Tamoxifen at both low and high doses influences breast tissue composition and expression of histological markers in the normal breast. Our findings connect epithelial proliferation with tissue remodelling in premenopausal women and provide novel insights to understanding biological mechanisms of primary prevention with tamoxifen.     

Inter-rater reliability of the Swedish modified version of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (SwePASS) in the acute phase after stroke

Background: Before implementation of the new scale, the Swedish modified version of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (SwePASS), to clinical practice, it is fundamental to analyze its measurement properties.Objective: To examine the inter-rater reliability of the SwePASS in the acute phase after stroke.

Methods: Day 3 to day 7 after admission to a stroke unit, 64 persons with stroke were assessed twice, using the SwePASS, by two physiotherapists. Inter-rater reliability was determined using percentage-agreement and the rank-invariant method: relative position, relative concentration, and relative rank variance.

Results: The raters showed a percentage agreement of ≥75% in the assessments using the SwePASS. For 9 of the 12 items, the percentage agreement was >80%. For 8 of the 12 items, there was a statistically significant change in position, revealed in relative position values between 0.08 and 0.15. Three items had statistically significant positive relative concentration values between ?0.11 and 0.10. Except for a statistically significant negligible relative variance value of 0.01 for the items 1 and 8, there was no relative variance.

Conclusions: The SwePASS shows an acceptable inter-rater reliability, albeit with potential for improvement. The reliability can be improved by a consensus how to interpret the scale between the raters prior to implementation in the clinic.     

The economics of general thromboembolic prophylaxis

The clinical and economic effects of each of 3 alternatives—no prophylaxis, general prophylaxis, and selective treatment—have been assessed in conjunction with 3 types of surgery—general surgery, the subset surgery for cholelithiasis, and elective hip surgery. The costs of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications have been calculated from the figures for 28 patients hospitalized at the Department of Surgery, Malmö General Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. The anticipated number of thromboembolic complications—and thus even the number of fatal pulmonary embolisms—can be minimized in all 3 types of surgery by means of general prophylaxis. General prophylaxis with low-dose heparin is, however, accompanied by the greatest incidence of hemorrhagic complications. Health care costs are minimized with general prophylaxis in elective hip and general surgery, while no prophylaxis is the best alternative in surgery for cholelithiasis. From the patient's point of view, general prophylaxis minimizes the duration of thromboembolic disease in general surgery as well as in elective hip surgery. In surgery for cholelithiasis, however, no differences in health loss for the individual are shown between the 2 main alternatives, no prophylaxis and general prophylaxis. Selective treatment means treatment after diagnosis of thrombosis with some screening method. The alternative selective treatment was the least satisfactory of those 3 studied.

---

Resumen Los efectos clínicos y económicos de cada una de 3 alternatives en la profilaxis tromboembólica (no profilaxis, profilaxis general con heparina de baja dosis, y tratamiento selectivo) fueron valorados en 3 tipos de cirugía: cirugía general (abdominal), el subgrupo de cirugía general para colelitiasis, y cirugía electiva de cadera. Los costos de las complicaciones tromboembólicas y hemorrágicas fueron calculados a partir de las cifras observadas en 28 pacientes hospitalizados en el Departmento de Cirugía. El número de predicción de complicaciones tromboembólicas, y el número de embolismos pulmonares fatales pueden ser minimizados en los 3 tipos de cirugía mediante la profilaxis general. Sin embargo, la profilaxis general con heparina de baja dosis se acompaña de la más alta incidencia de complicaciones hemorrágicas.Los costos de la atención pueden ser minimizados mediante la profilaxis general en cirugía electiva de cadera y en cirugía general abdominal, en tanto que la no profilaxis es la mejor alternativa para la cirugía de colelitiasis.Desde el punto de vista del paciente, la profilaxis general minimiza la duración de la enfermedad tromboembólica en la cirugía general abdominal así como en la cirugía electiva de cadera. En la cirugía para colelitiasis, sin embargo, no se demuestran diferencias entre las dos alternatives principales, no profilaxis y profilaxis general.El tratamiento selectivo significa tratamiento una vez establecido el diagnóstico de trombosis mediante algún método de tamizaje. La alternativa de tratamiento selectivo fue la menos satisfactoria de las 3 alternatives estudiadas.

---

Résumé Les effets cliniques et financiers de 3 comportements variables: absence de prophylaxie, prophylaxie, traitement sélectif ont été évalué en fonction de trois types de chirurgie: chirurgie générale, chirurgie spéciale de la lithiase biliaire, chirurgie élective de la hanche. Les coûts des complications thrombo-emboliques et hémorragiques ont été calculés à partir des données numériques concernant 28 malades hospitalisés dans le service de chirurgie. Le nombre envisagé des complications thromboemboliques et par conséquent le nombre d'embolie pulmonaire fatale a été réduit dans les 3 types de chirurgie choisis grâce au traitement prophylactique. Cependant il convient de noter que le traitement prophylactique à l'aide de faible dose d'héparine s'accompagne de complications hémorragiques plus nombreuses.Les coûts des soins de la chirurgie élective de la hanche et de la chirurgie générale sont réduits grâce au traitement prophylactique alors que l'absence de traitement prophylactique représente la meilleure modalité à observer dans le traitement de la chirurgie biliaire.En ce qui concerne le point de vue du malade le traitement prophylactique réduit la durée de la maladie thromboembolique compliquant la chirurgie générale ou la chirurgie de la hanche. En revanche dans la chirurgie de la lithiase biliaire aucun inconvénient pour la santé du malade ne s'observe que le traitement prophylactique soit ou ne soit pas appliqué.Le traitement sélectif qui répond au traitement institué après que le diagnostic ait été posé par des méthodes de dépistage est la moins satisfaisante des trois attitudes envisagées.

---

---

Supported by grant no. 00759 from the Swedish Medical Research Council.     

Different kinetics of lung clearance of technetium-99m labelled diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid in patients with sarcoidosis and smokers

The rate of clearance from the lungs of inhaled technetium-99m labelled diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (^99mTc-DTPA) is often increased in interstitial lung disease as well as in smoking. In smokers a bi-exponential clearance course of ⁹⁹mTc-DTPA when measured over 3 h has previously been shown. This study was performed to compare the kinetics of clearance of ^99mTc-DTPA, measured for 3 h, in sarcoid patients and healthy smokers. Forty-one never-smoking patients with sarcoidosis and radiological signs of intrathoracic disease were studied. The results were compared with those of 16 healthy current smokers and of 14 healthy never-smokers reported previously. A mono-exponential clearance equation described the clearance in 22 of the sarcoid patients and all normal never-smokers, but with a shorter average tracer half-life in the patients (P<0.05). In 19 patients and all smokers a bi-exponential equation gave a significantly better curve fit. The rate of clearance of the slow component was higher in patients with sarcoidosis than in smokers (P< 0.05). The fraction of the tracer cleared by the fast clearance component was smaller in patients with sarcoidosis than in smokers (P<0.01). Differences in kinetics of clearance of ^99mTc-DTPA in sarcoidosis and smoking could thus be demonstrated, suggesting that the abnormal clearance is caused by diverging pathophysiological mechanisms.     

What Factors in Early Pregnancy Indicate that the Mother Will Be Hit by Her Partner during the Year after Childbirth?A Nationwide Swedish Survey

Abstract: Background : To be hit by one's intimate partner during the first year after childbirth may affect a woman's health and ability to take care of her newborn. The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence and indicators in early pregnancy of a woman being hit by her partner during the year after childbirth. Method : Information was collected by a postal questionnaire in early pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth from the approximately 5,550 women in Sweden who visited an antenatal care clinic for the first time during one of three chosen weeks in 1999 and 2000. Results : Of the 3,266 recruited women, 2,563 returned the follow‐up questionnaire. Being hit during the first year after childbirth was reported by 52 of the 2,563 (2%) women: 32 (61%) had been hit by their partner once, 12 (23%) twice, and 8 (15%) three or more times. Risk increased in women who were age 24 years or younger (3.9% had been hit), unmarried (7.1%), born in countries outside Europe (6.8%), with a partner born outside Europe (5.4%), had a low level of education (8.9%), and were unemployed (5.0%). In early pregnancy, women with back pain (4.0%), a chronic illness (4.1%), coital pain (6.1%), frequent depression‐related symptoms (8.1%), stomach pain (3.8%), or a urinary tract problem (6.3%) were hit more often than others after childbirth. Conclusions : At least 2 percent of Swedish women giving birth in 2000 were hit by their partner during the year after childbirth. Using identified predictors during antenatal care may increase the likelihood of finding women at risk, thereby enhancing the possibility of interventions to prevent this crime and health hazard.