Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dialysis patients.

Patients with renal failure are believed to have a poor survival rate after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but there is little specific information about the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dialysis patients. To be better able to inform dialysis patients and assist them in decision making about cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the eight-year experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dialysis patients at a university dialysis program was analyzed and outcomes were compared with those of a control group of nondialysis patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the same time period in the same hospital. Of 221 dialysis patients experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest, 74 (34%) had CPR compared with 247 (21%) of 1,201 control patients (P = 0.0002). Six of 74 (8%; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 14%) dialysis patients survived to hospital discharge compared with 30 of 247 (12%; 95% confidence interval, 8 to 16%) control patients (P = not significant). At 6 months after CPR, 2 (3%) of 74 dialysis patients were still alive compared with 23 (9%) of 247 controls (P = 0.044); this difference was not explained by age or comorbid conditions. Twenty-one (78%) of the 27 successfully resuscitated dialysis patients died a mean of 4.4 days later; 95% were on mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit at the time of death. It was concluded that cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a procedure that rarely results in extended survival for dialysis patients. In discussions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation with dialysis patients, nephrologists should provide this information.     

A randomized controlled trial of electromagnetic therapy in the primary care management of venous leg ulceration

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to establish the potential efficacy, tolerabilityand side-effect profile of electromagnetic therapy as an adjunctto conventional dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, double blind controlled clinicaltrial was carried out in a dedicated leg ulcer clinic basedin one urban general practice. Nineteen patients with leg ulcersof confirmed venous aetiology were assessed. The main outcomemeasures were rate and scale of venous leg ulcer healing, changesin patient-reported pain levels, quality of life, degree ofmobility, side effect profile and acceptability to patientsand staff. RESULTS: Sixty-eight per cent of patients attending this dedicated clinicachieved improvements in the size of their ulcer (4, 21%, healedfully) and in reduced pain levels (P < 0.05) during the trial,despite the chronicity of ulcer histories. Patients treatedwith electromagnetic therapy at 800 Hz were found at day 50to have significantly greater healing (P < 0.05) and paincontrol (P < 0.05) than placebo therapy or treatment with600 Hz. All patients reported improved mobility at the end ofthe study. The electromagnetic therapy was well tolerated bypatients, with no differences between groups in reporting adverseevents, and proved acceptable to staff. CONCLUSION: Despite the small numbers in this pilot study, electromagnetictherapy provided significant gains in the healing of venousleg ulcers and reduction in pain. Keywords. Electromagnetic therapy, RCT, leg ulcers, primary care.     

Calcium mass transfer in peritoneal dialysis patients using 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate.

Standard peritoneal dialysate has a relatively high calcium concentration of 3.5 mEq/l. Peritoneal dialysis patients thus gain calcium from the dialysate which contributes to the risk of hypercalcemia. Dialysate with 2.5 mEq/l calcium is now available. Theoretically, using dialysate with this calcium content, calcium transfer should be negative (from the patient into the dialysate) when the patient is hypercalcemic, and positive when the patient is normocalcemic or hypercalcemic. Thus, 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate may allow larger doses of calcium carbonate to be prescribed. We compared calcium mass transfer (CMT) in 17 stable peritoneal dialysis patients using 3.5 and 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate. A solution of 2.05 l, 1.5 g/dl dextrose was dwelled for 4 hours. Calcium was measured in the drained dialysate and serum (total and ionized). Mean CMT was 0.7 +/- 0.5 mEq/exchange using 3.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate and -0.9 +/- 0.9 mEq/exchange using 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate (p less than 0.0001). At the time of the CMT studies, the mean serum ionized calcium levels were identical for the two groups (2.6 mEq/l). CMT correlated inversely with serum total calcium, serum ionized calcium, and drained dialysate volume. During hypercalcemia calcium transfer was from the dialysate to the patient when 3.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate was used, but from the patient to the dialysate when 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate was used. We conclude that 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate is effective in removing calcium and will be helpful in preventing hypercalcemia when large doses of oral calcium compounds are prescribed as a phosphate binder.