Diagnosis of diffuse and localized arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia by gated blood-pool SPECT.

This study aimed to assess the ability of global and local systolic parameters measured with gated blood-pool SPECT (GBPS) to diagnose and characterize the severity of diffuse or localized arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD). METHODS: Fifty-nine subjects with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias were prospectively included in the study. With the International Society and Federation of Cardiology criteria for ARVD as a gold standard, these subjects were classified as subjects without ARVD (21 control subjects) and patients with localized ARVD (16 patients) or diffuse ARVD (22 patients). Right ventricular volumes, right ventricular ejection fractions (EF), the SD of local EF (sigma-EF), and the SD of the local times of end systole (sigma-TES) were computed from GBPS data and compared among the groups in the study population. RESULTS: sigma-EF did not differ between control subjects and patients with diffuse or localized ARVD. Right ventricular EF and volumes differed between patients with diffuse ARVD and control subjects, with similar areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves, but right ventricular EF and volumes failed to differentiate patients with localized ARVD. In contrast, sigma-TES differed between patients with diffuse or localized ARVD and control subjects. Regression analysis showed that the systolic parameter most strongly associated with the diagnosis of ARVD was sigma-TES. The probabilities of a randomly chosen patient in the diffuse ARVD group and of a randomly chosen patient in the localized ARVD group having sigma-TES values greater than that of a randomly chosen control subject were 98.5% and 96.7%, respectively. For the diagnosis of localized ARVD, a threshold of 80 ms for sigma-TES corresponded to sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 81%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: With GBPS, both diffuse ARVD and localized ARVD can be accurately diagnosed by computing sigma-TES for all of the pixels on the surface of the right ventricle.     

Cell irradiation caused by diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures: dose heterogeneity and biological consequences

Most radionuclides used for diagnostic imaging emit Auger electrons (technetium-99m, iodine-123, indium-111, gallium-67 and thallium-201). Their very short range in biological tissues may lead to dose heterogeneity at the cellular level with radiobiological consequences. This report describes the dosimetric models used to calculate the mean dose absorbed by the cell nucleus from Auger radionuclides. The techniques used to determine the biodistribution of radiopharmaceuticals at the subcellular level are also described and compared. Published examples of cellular dosimetry computations performed with radiotracers are reviewed in various clinical settings. Finally, the biological implications of the subcellular localization of Auger emitters are examined. While a number of efforts have been made to obtain dosimetric models and to estimate subcellular distribution of radioactivity, little is known of the cellular dosimetry of most radiopharmaceuticals used in diagnostic imaging. However, biological examples of selective radiotracer uptake have been shown, leading to extremely strong cell-cell dose heterogeneity. Furthermore, radiobiological experiments show that the biological effects of Auger emitters incorporated into DNA can be severe, with relative biological effectiveness greater than 1 compared with external X-rays. These findings clearly show that the assessment of biological risks associated with internal administration of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals must focus not only on target organs as a whole, but also on the cellular level. This review proposes the most appropriate model for dosimetric computations (cellular or conventional) according to the subcellular distribution of radiotracers. The radionuclide of choice and the general strategy used to design new diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals are also discussed.     

<Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging to Diagnose Septic Emboli and Mycotic Aneurysms in Patients with Endocarditis and Cardiac Device Infections

Purpose of review

This review analyzes recent studies evaluating the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of peripheral emboli and secondary infectious foci in patients with infective endocarditis and cardiac device infections.

Recent findings

Detection of extracardiac septic localizations in patients with infective endocarditis and cardiac device infections is crucial, as it may impact the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management. Recent literature substantiated the clinical usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in this setting.

Summary

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT has proven its high diagnostic value for the detection of peripheral emboli in patients with infective endocarditis and cardiac device infections, substantially affecting patients’ outcome and treatment. A multimodal approach, combining the high sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT with morphological imaging seems promising.

     

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in forty-eight patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

In patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, which is either sporadic or integrated into multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, accurate localization of all the tumours is difficult and may have therapeutic implications. In an attempt to improve this localization, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using [¹¹¹In-DTPA-D-Phe¹]-octreotide was performed prospectively in 48 consecutive patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Thirty of them had the sporadic type of this disease. Scintigraphic data were compared with data obtained by conventional imaging methods, and also, in 32 selected patients, with those obtained by endoscopic ultrasonography. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy showed abnormal tracer uptake in 39 patients (81%), in whom it correctly identified 50 of the 60 tumoral sites (83%) previously localized by the other imaging methods. In 17 patients (35%) somatostatin receptor scintigraphy disclosed abnormal tracer uptake at 18 different tumoral sites: 14 were located in the abdomen, including four in the liver and eight in the duodenopancreatic area, and four outside the abdomen, including two in the mediastinum. Six of the ten tumoral sites which were not correctly identified by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy were located in the duodeno-pancreatic area. However, in the 20 patients for whom conventional techniques failed to visualize any tumour in the duodenopancreatic area, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was positive in ten (50%) whereas endoscopic ultrasonography was only positive in five (25%). In our patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy appeared to be a useful new addition to the battery of tests used for tumour detection.     

Automatic quantification of right ventricular function with gated blood pool SPECT

BACKGROUND: Quantification of right ventricular (RV) function is clinically relevant for the risk stratification and follow-up of patients with a wide spectrum of disease. This can be achieved with electrocardiography-gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (GBPS). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the completely automatic QBS GBPS processing software as compared with equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) and with a GBPS manual segmentation method (GBPS(35%)) for the measurement of global RV ejection fraction (EF), taking the first-pass RNA (FP-RNA) as the gold standard. In parallel, we compared the RVEF, RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), and RV end-systolic volume (ESV) provided by QBS and GBPS(35%). METHODS AND RESULTS: The population included 85 patients with chronic post-embolic pulmonary hypertension. Twenty-one patients were excluded because of unsuccessful FP-RNA. Intraobserver and interobserver RVEF, RVEDV, and RVESV reproducibilities encountered with planar RNA, QBS, and GBPS(35%) were similar and compared favorably with those calculated with FP-RNA for RVEF. Mean RVEF was different between all methods. RVEF calculated with FP-RNA was better correlated to QBS (r = 0.68) and GBPS(35%) (r = 0.70) than to planar RNA (r = 0.59). RVEDV and RVESV with QBS were lower than with GBPS(35%), by 29% +/- 14% and 36% +/- 13%, respectively. RVEDV and RVESV with QBS were highly correlated to corresponding GBPS(35%) values: r = 0.88 and r = 0.91, respectively. CONCLUSION: As opposed to FP-RNA, GBPS is highly successful for the quantification of RV function. Both QBS and GBPS(35%) provide RVEF values similarly well correlated to FP-RNA and performed better than planar RNA. RVEF, RVEDV, and RVESV provided by QBS and GBPS(35%) are highly correlated. All of these RV functional measurements require further validation versus a better gold standard before their accuracy can be established.     

Detection of bone metastases in patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors: bone scintigraphy compared with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.

Scintigraphy with somatostatin analogs is a sensitive method for the staging and therapeutic management of patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors. The aim of this study was to compare prospectively somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) using 111n-pentetreotide with bone scintigraphy using 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate for the detection of bone metastases. METHODS: One-hundred-forty-five patients with proven endocrine GEP tumors were investigated. Patients were classified according to the presence of bone metastases as indicated by CT, MRI or histologic data. Group I included 19 patients with confirmed bone metastases, and group II included 126 patients without bone metastases. RESULTS: In group I, SRS was positive in all 19 patients with bone metastases, and bone scintigraphy was positive in 17 patients. Bone metastases were found to occur predominantly in patients with liver metastases. In group 11, 5 patients had recent bone surgery for fracture or arthritis. SRS showed bone uptake in 4 of these patients, and bone scanning showed abnormal uptake in 5. In 7 of the remaining 121 group II patients, SRS was negative and bone scanning showed abnormal bone uptake suggesting bone metastases. The detection of bone metastases was of major prognostic value, because 42% of group 1 patients died during a 2-y follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with GEP tumors, the accuracy of SRS appears to be similar to that of bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases.     

Multivariate analysis of pathophysiological factors in reflux oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Reflux oesophagitis is considered a multifactorial disease, but the respective roles of the main factors involved in its pathophysiology have not been clearly established. AIMS: To attempt to assign these roles by means of a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the main parameters associated with reflux oesophagitis. PATIENTS: Eighty seven patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were studied: 41 without oesophagitis and 46 with reflux oesophagitis grade 1 to 3. METHODS: (1) Monovariate comparison of patients' characteristics and of parameters derived from in hospital 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring, oesophageal manometry, double isotope gastric emptying studies, and basal and pentagastrin stimulated gastric acid and pepsin output determinations, between patients with and without oesophagitis. (2) Multivariate logistic regression analysis including the parameters significant in the monovariate analysis. RESULTS: Among the 16 significant parameters from monovariate analysis, three significant independent parameters were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis: number of refluxes lasting more than five minutes, reflecting oesophageal acid clearance (p = 0.002); basal lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (p = 0.008); and peak acid output (p = 0.012). These three parameters were not correlated with each other. The multivariate model was highly discriminant (correct classification of 81.3% of the cases (95% confidence intervals 0.723, 0.903). Risk for oesophagitis increased as a function of the tercile threshold values of the three parameters. Odds ratios of the three parameters for oesophagitis risk were similar, regardless of whether they were calculated when the patients were compared as a function of oesophagitis grade or the presence or absence of oesophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: This multivariate approach adds evidence that impaired oesophageal acid clearance and hypotonic lower oesophageal sphincter are the two major independent pathophysiological factors of oesophagitis, but also showed that the acid secretion level is an independent pathophysiological factor.