Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models

Background  

Acromioclavicular injuries are common in sports medicine. Surgical intervention is generally advocated for chronic instability of Rockwood grade III and more severe injuries. Various methods of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction and augmentation have been described. The objective of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of a novel palmaris-longus tendon reconstruction with those of the native AC+CC ligaments, the modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction, the ACJ capsuloligamentous complex repair, screw and clavicle hook plate augmentation.     

Dural sinus thrombosis: study using intermediate field strength MR imaging

The magnetic resonance (MR) images of six patients with thrombosis of a dural sinus were reviewed. The diagnosis had been verified by computed tomographic scans in three patients and arteriograms in two; in the sixth patient, only MR imaging was used to confirm the clinical syndrome. In all patients, high-intensity signal was seen from the thrombus within the affected dural sinus on all echoes. This persistent signal intensity allowed intravascular clot to be distinguished from normal causes of increased signal such as flow-related enhancement (entry phenomenon) and even-echo rephasing. MR imaging demonstrated the cause of the thrombosis in three patients: two were secondary to adjacent tumors, and one was secondary to unsuspected mastoiditis. Complications such as infarction were also demonstrated. Using MR imaging, one can easily and safely diagnose thrombosis of a dural sinus. MR should be the imaging method of choice in patients suspected of having thrombosis of a dural sinus.     

Corticosteroids for multiple sclerosis: II. Application for disease-modifying effects

Physicians who treat multiple sclerosis (MS) face the challenge of patients exhibiting ongoing disease activity, including exacerbations, loss of functional capabilities, intellectual decline, and radiologic progression, despite being on a disease-modifying agent (DMA). After searching for factors that might at least in part explain these changes—such as nonadherent drug-taking behavior, or the presence of interfer-on-neutralizing antibodies—some providers may ultimately decide to switch the patient to another DMA. In most circumstances, patients likely derive only partial effects from these agents, even in the absence of compromising factors. Thus, a number of factors must be considered in order to intensify the treatment regimen in response to disease progression. In the context of an inadequate treatment response to a DMA, some clinicians will convert the patient to an alternative therapy, and others will instead use a second agent in combination with the first (the so-called platform agent). In the first of this two-part series, we explored the use of anti-inflammatory CS and ACTH to treat MS exacerbations. Although we underscored the limited availability of evidence-based studies to support specific regimens for this purpose, there is an even greater paucity of data to support the routine use of these agents in order to achieve chronic disease-modifying effects in those who continue to deteriorate clinically, radiographically, or both. Without doubt, a number of factors influence the formulation of combination treatment plan for MS. Nevertheless, we will focus on the rationale and practical schemes that can be considered for using corticosteroids (CS) (and perhaps even ACTH) in an attempt to modify various domains of ongoing disease activity.