Nitrate administration increases blood flow in dysfunctional but viable myocardium, leading to improved assessment of myocardial viability: A PET study.

SPECT with 99mTc-labeled agents is better able to detect viability after nitrate administration. Nitrates induce vasodilation and may increase blood flow to severely hypoperfused but viable myocardium, thereby enhancing tracer delivery and improving the detection of viability. Quantitative data on the changes in blood flow are lacking in SPECT but can be provided by PET. The aim of the present study was to use PET to evaluate whether nitrate administration increases blood flow to chronically dysfunctional but viable myocardium. METHODS: 13N-Ammonia PET was used to quantitatively assess blood flow, and 18F-FDG PET was used as the gold standard to detect viable myocardium. Twenty-five patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction underwent 13N-ammonia PET at rest and after nitrate administration. RESULTS: A significant increase in nitrate-enhanced blood flow was observed in viable segments (from 0.55 +/- 0.15 to 0.68 +/- 0.24 mL/min/g, P < 0.05). No statistically significant change in blood flow was observed in nonviable segments (0.60 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.55 +/- 0.18 mL/min/g). A ratio of at least 1.1 for nitrate-enhanced flow to resting flow allowed optimal detection of viable myocardium, yielding a sensitivity of 82% with a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION: 13N-Ammonia PET showed a significant increase in nitrate-enhanced blood flow in viable myocardium, whereas blood flow remained unchanged after nitrate administration in nonviable myocardium. Nitrate use during myocardial perfusion imaging will lead to improved assessment of myocardial viability.     

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist therapy for hirsutism is as effective as high dose cyproterone acetate but results in a longer remission

Both cyproterone acetate (CPA) and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) have been shown to be effective for the treatment of hirsutism. We wished to compare the effectiveness of CPA in two standard doses with GnRHa and add-back therapy and to compare the length of remission after these treatments. A total of 60 hirsute hyperandrogenic women was assigned to the following treatment groups: CPA 2 mg with 35 microg of ethinylestradiol for 21 days each month (Diane group), CPA 50 mg, days 5-15, and ethinylestradiol 50 microg, days 5-25, each month (CPA group) or Decapeptyl 3.75 mg i.m. every 28 days with the addition of conjugated oestrogen 0.625 mg, days 1-21, and medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, days 12-21 (GnRHa group). Hirsutism was graded by the Ferriman-Gallwey-Lorenzo (FGL) index and anagen hair shaft diameters and serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone were assessed before and every 3 months during and after treatment. All women were treated for 1 year with 1 year follow-up. At baseline hirsutism and endocrine patterns were similar in all groups. After one year of treatment, hirsutism decreased in all groups but the changes were greater (P <0.05) in the CPA and GnRHa groups than in the Diane group. Serum LH and testosterone were lowest in the GnRHa group. After withdrawal, hirsutism increased rapidly in the Diane and CPA groups and after 6 months, FGL scores and hair shaft diameters were similar to pretreatment values. In the GnRHa group, hirsutism increased more gradually and after 1 year of withdrawal, FGL scores and hair diameters were significantly (P <0.05) less than pretreatment values. Serum LH and testosterone increased rapidly in all three groups reaching pretreatment values by 6 months. These data suggest equal efficacy of the GnRHa and the high dose CPA regimen for the treatment of hirsutism in hyperandrogenic women. GnRHa with add-back treatment appears to result in a longer remission of hirsutism in comparison with CPA.      

Maxillary sinusitis in adults: an evaluation of placebo-controlled double-blind trials

BACKGROUND: In general practice, acute sinusitis is frequently diagnosed and treated with antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in acute maxillary sinusitis in adults by assessing the methodological quality of placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials. METHOD: An evaluation by four raters through a 35-item scoring-scale for internal and external validity of all placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials on acute sinusitis found between January 1966 and July 1996. RESULTS: Eighty-five trials were excluded because they were not placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, or were carried out in patients with chronic sinusitis or in children. The three remaining trials were performed in different populations (one in general practice) between 1973 and 1978. Only one study claimed superiority of antibiotic treatment. Different inclusion criteria and major outcome measures were used by the authors. The reliability of major outcome events was reported poorly or not at all and in two studies outcome measures were clinically inappropriate. The studies scored 30-62% of the maximum attainable score for internal validity and 10-20% for external validity. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in acute maxillary sinusitis in a general practice population is not based sufficiently on evidence.      

Intraarterial sodium nitroprusside infusion in the treatment of severe ergotism

Treatment of migraine with ergot alkaloids may produce systemic vasospasm in patients, especially as a result of automedication and overconsumption but also due to individual hypersensitivity. Peripheral vasoconstriction may lead to gangrene of the extremities, necessitating amputation. Various treatments have been tried against ischemic complications during ergotism with varied and unpredictable results. We report two recent cases of severe acute peripheral ischemia due to ergotamine abuse successfully treated with continuous systemic sodium nitroprusside infusion. The doses used during intraarterial injection are well below those known to be toxic. Consequently, the adverse effects of cyanide toxicity can be avoided. We think that intraarterial infusion of sodium nitroprusside, associated with forced diuresis and the administration of hydroxycobalamin, constitutes the treatment of choice of extreme peripheral ischemia of ergotism.     

Retention of "safe" blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: There are obvious advantages to increasing donor retention. However, for reasons of blood safety, certain donors may, in fact, be more desirable to retain than others. “Safe” donors are defined as those who provided a blood donation that was negative on all laboratory screening tests and who subsequently reported no behavioral risks in response to an anonymous survey. This study identifies the most important factors affecting the intention of “safe” donors to provide another donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous survey asking about donation history, sexual history, injecting drug use, and recent donation experience was mailed to 50,162 randomly selected allogeneic donors (including directed donors) who gave blood from April through July or from October through December 1993 at one of the five United States blood centers participating in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Before mailing, questionnaires were coded to designate donors with nonreactive laboratory screening tests at their most recent donation. RESULTS: A total of 34,726 donors (69%) responded, with substantially higher response among repeat donors. According to reported intentions only, the vast majority of “safe” donors indicated a high likelihood of donating again within the next 12 months. Only 3.4 percent reported a low likelihood of donating again. A comparison of those likely to return and those unlikely to return reveals significant differences in demographics and in ratings of the donation experience. A higher proportion of those unlikely to return were first-time donors, minority-group donors, and donors with less education. The highest projected loss among “safe” donors was seen for those who gave a fair to poor assessment of their treatment by blood center staff or of their physical well-being during or after donating. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that efforts to improve donors' perceptions of their donation experience, as well as attention to the physical effects of blood donation, may aid in the retention of both repeat and first-time donors.     

Follistatin and activin A production by the male reproductive tract

Follistatin is a binding protein for the activin and inhibin family of hormones, regulating their biological activity. In the male reproductive tract, the interaction of these factors is likely to be involved in the regulation of the proliferation of several cell types. We have investigated the presence of follistatin and activin A in seminal plasma using specific immunoassays and have localized follistatin and activin/inhibin subunits in the adult human testis, prostate and seminal vesicle to establish their likely sources. High concentrations of immunoreactive follistatin were present in seminal plasma in normal men (mean 97.9 ng/ml; 1.43 ng/ml in peripheral plasma) and were similar in men with oligo/azoospermia and following vasectomy. Follistatin immunoreactivity was localized to both Leydig and Sertoli cells of the testis, and to epithelial cells of the prostate gland and seminal vesicle, which are likely to be the predominant sources of the hormone in seminal plasma. Activin A was also present in seminal plasma in normal men but was undetectable following vasectomy, thus deriving from the testis. Consistent with this finding, the betaA-subunit was immunolocalized in Sertoli and Leydig cells but was not present in seminal vesicle or prostate gland. The functional significance of the high concentrations of follistatin secreted into seminal plasma by the prostate gland and/or seminal vesicle is uncertain, but they may regulate the biological activity of testis-derived activin A and inhibin B.      

An adjusted version of Kohlberg's moral theory: discussion of its validity for research in nursing ethics

Critics of Kohlberg's moral theory today focus on the content of his theory and more specifically on its justice-orientated moral concept. This has led to the well-known 'justice-care debate'. The purpose of this article is to critically examine the validity of Kohlberg's moral theory for research in nursing ethics from a caring perspective (referring to the content) as well as from a cognitive-structural perspective (referring to the basic assumptions of the model). The analysis points to the usefulness and value of the cognitive-structural model to empirically study nurses' ethical behaviour; the content of Kohlberg's model, however, needs to be adapted by adding a caring perspective as well as some personal and situational variables. An adjusted version of Kohlberg's model is proposed and discussed.