Delivery of antiplaque agents from dentifrices, gels, and mouthwashes.

Antiplaque agents delivered from toothpastes, gels, or mouthrinses can augment mechanical oral hygiene procedures to control the formation of supragingival plaque and the development of early periodontal disease. Clinically effective antiplaque agents are characterized by a combination of intrinsic antibacterial activity and good oral retention properties. The overall oral retention of an antiplaque agent is determined by the strength and rate of association of the agent with its receptor sites and the accessibility of these sites. The substantivity of an antiplaque agent and its clearance from the oral cavity are determined by the rate of dissociation of the agent from the receptor sites and the salivary composition and flow rate. Positively charged and non-charged organic molecules, metal ions, enzymes, and surface-active agents have all been considered as antiplaque agents. To exert clinical antiplaque activity, an antimicrobial agent must be formulated in a chemically compatible delivery vehicle to give optimal release and uptake to the sites of action in a biologically active form during its time of application. In principle, antiplaque activity may be enhanced by combining antimicrobial agents with broadly similar, but complementary, modes of action. Alternatively, the activity of a single agent may be increased by use of a retention aid to enhance oral substantivity. Substantial evidence exists to demonstrate the validity of the first approach. However, there are few data, as yet, to support the effectiveness of the second. The oral mucosa is the bulk retention site for all clinically proven antiplaque agents. Plaque, the pellicle-coated tooth surface, and saliva are probably all sites of biological action. A detailed understanding of the interactions between agents and the various receptor sites, and of the importance of these receptor sites to biological activity, is generally lacking.     

Ärztliche Fehleroffenbarung – Strafrechtliche Strategien für postinvasive Arzt-Patientengespräche

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Errare humanum est ... but it is also human to prevent errors

Identification errors remain the most serious and the most common type of error in blood transfusion practice. Adverse events may occur when a patient has similar or identical identifiers to another patient (a ‘doppelgänger’), is doubly registered (a ‘duplicate registration’), or when registration details are derived from two or more separate sources (a ‘hybrid registration’). Such categorization provides a valuable conceptual framework for the development of appropriate risk management strategies. Distinguishing doppelgängers from duplicate registrations is not always easy. A search of the Harefield Hospital Patient Administration System (PAS) database revealed 39 registrations that shared a forename, surname and date of birth with at least one other registration. Thirty‐seven of these cases involved a duplicate registration, one involved a hybrid registration, and one involved a doppelgänger. A national strategic tracing service is available in the UK to help resolve difficult cases. Little attention has been directed at the extent to which risk reduction strategies in this area are in conflict with political and regulatory agendas. Most notable are initiatives that aim to preserve patient confidentiality. The less that is known about an individual, the greater is the risk he will be mistaken for someone who possesses similar identifiers to himself. An important, but largely unexplored, contributor to patient identification errors is innate cognitive bias. The fundamental concept underlying all blood transfusion – unique patient identity – is inherently ambiguous and vulnerable to a range of misperceptions, particularly with regard to the twin themes of coincidence and uniqueness. A major challenge will be to develop approaches in practice and education that are suitably informed by insights gleaned from cognitive and evolutionary psychology.     

Prevention of Postinfectious Asthma in Children by Reducing Self-Inoculatory Behavior

Recent studies have shown that the spread of infectious nasalsecretions from hand-to-hand or hand-to-object, followed byself-inoculation is an efficient means of viral transmission.The present study was designed to investigate whether self-inoculationbehavior in asthmatic children could be reduced and, if so,whether this reduction would reduce the frequency of infectionand asthma. Sixteen subjects aged 4 to 8, all diagnosed withpostinfectious asthma, were assigned to a treatment (differentialreinforcement of other behavior and contingent education) orplacebo control condition. Results indicate that self-inoculatorybehavior, infection, and asthma were signjficantly reduced.These findings may indicate an important role for behavioralmedicine inpostinfectious asthma.