Rapid and highly resolving associative affective learning: Convergent electro- and magnetoencephalographic evidence from vision and audition

Various pathway models for emotional processing suggest early prefrontal contributions to affective stimulus evaluation. Yet, electrophysiological evidence for such rapid modulations is still sparse. In a series of four MEG/EEG studies which investigated associative learning in vision and audition using a novel MultiCS Conditioning paradigm, many different neutral stimuli (faces, tones) were paired with aversive and appetitive events in only two to three learning instances. Electrophysiological correlates of neural activity revealed highly significant amplified processing for conditioned stimuli within distributed prefrontal and sensory cortical networks. In both, vision and audition, affect-specific responses occurred in two successive waves of rapid (vision: 50–80 ms, audition: 25–65 ms) and mid-latency (vision: >130 ms, audition: >100 ms) processing. Interestingly, behavioral measures indicated that MultiCS Conditioning successfully prevented contingency awareness. We conclude that affective processing rapidly recruits highly elaborate and widely distributed networks with substantial capacity for fast learning and excellent resolving power.     

Novel Mutations in the GPIIb and GPIIIa Genes in Glanzmann Thrombasthenia

BACKGROUND: Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is an inherited autosomal recessive platelet disorder characterized by a complete or partial lack, or mutation, of the GPIIb/IIIa complex (integrin α(IIb)β(3)) on the thrombocytes' surface, leading to a severe bleeding syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Molecular genetic analysis was performed in patients with suspected GT. The aim of the present study was the identification of new natural variants, their impact on platelet function, and their relation to the risk of bleeding. RESULTS: Expression of the platelet integrin α(IIb)β(3) was determined by flow cytometry. Mutations were identified through sequencing of cDNA and genomic DNA. In addition, platelet function studies (PAC-binding, aggregations) were implemented. The study included 25 patients revealing 13 mutations (GPIIb: n = 9; GPIIIa: n = 4). Two of the 13 mutations were previously described (T207I; L214P). The remaining mutations have not been published yet, whereas 1 mutation in 2 unrelated families was identical (3062 T→C). CONCLUSION: All patients with less than 25% of present α(IIb)β(3) have a medical history of bleeding.     

Vasoactivity of diadenosine polyphosphates in human small mesenteric resistance arteries

Diadenosine polyphosphates (ApnA) (n = 3-6) induced vasoconstrictions in isolated human mesenteric resistance arteries (hMRAs) mounted in a microvessel myograph (rank order of potency: Ap5A > Ap6A > Ap4A > Ap3A). The contractile effects of ApnA in hMRA were similar to their effects in rat MRA investigated previously. ATP, ADP, AMP, and adenosine had less contractile potency than ApnA, suggesting that the observed effects were not induced by the degradation products of ApnA. Ap4A- and Ap5A-induced vasoconstriction was inhibited by pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid (PPADS) (P2X purinoceptor antagonist) but not by ADP3'5' (P2Y purinoceptor antagonist). Thus, this purinergic vasoconstriction of hMRA seems to be P2X but not P2Y purinoceptor-mediated. In precontracted hMRA all ApnA caused vasorelaxations but (in contrast to rat MRA) the potencies of the ApnA did not differ significantly from each other. The ApnA degradation products had less vasorelaxing potency than ApnA, demonstrating that the vasorelaxations can be ascribed to the ApnA themselves. Ap5A-induced vasorelaxation of hMRA could neither be inhibited with ADP3'5' nor with PPADS, which reveals a decisive difference to the rat MRA where the inhibitory profile demonstrated the importance of the P2Y purinoceptor for Ap5A-induced vasorelaxation. However, Ap4A-induced vasorelaxation in hMRA could be inhibited by ADP3'5'. These findings show that Ap4A-induced vasorelaxation in hMRA is due to P2Y purinoceptor activation, that Ap5A evokes vasorelaxation in hMRA via another mechanism than Ap4A, and that data derived from the animal model cannot be simply transferred to human conditions.     

Impact of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy on diagnosis and therapy in patients with rheumatic diseases—a retrospective cohort study

Objectives: Many rheumatic diseases as well as their medications may cause gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies; in addition, some primary GI diseases may contribute or lead to rheumatic disease manifestations. The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical relevance of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and ileocolonoscopy (IC) in patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all rheumatological inpatients who underwent EGD and/or IC within 2 years.

Results: Within 2 years, 456 patients (261 female, 195 male) underwent 752 endoscopic investigations of the GI tract (419 EGDs and 333 ICs). Of all patients, 152 (33.3%) did not report any GI complaints. However, 28 of these asymptomatic patients (18.4%) suffered from esophagitis, a gastric ulcer could be identified in 20 patients (13%), whereas unspecific colitis was diagnosed in 19 patients (12.5%). In addition, 14 patients (9.2%) suffered from clinically unapparent Crohn's disease and two patients from Whipple's disease. In one patient with polymyalgia rheumatica, colon cancer was diagnosed. Altogether 304 patients reported GI complaints. Of these, 292 (39%) endoscopic investigations had impact on the final diagnosis or therapeutic strategy. The antirheumatic medication or the concomitant medication was changed in 18% of the patients due to the endoscopic findings; in 29 patients (6.5%) the initially clinically presumed diagnosis had to be corrected. In 70 patients (15%) with an undefined rheumatic diagnosis prior to endoscopy, endoscopic findings were decisive to establish the final diagnosis.

Conclusion: EGD and IC have a high diagnostic impact on patients with rheumatic diseases presenting with or without concomitant GI symptoms.