排序方式: 共有57条查询结果,搜索用时 22 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
微量白蛋白尿在系统性红斑狼疮患者早期肾损害诊断中的意义 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
目的探讨微量白蛋白尿在诊断系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)早期肾损害中的意义及其与疾病活动性的相关性。方法检测104例系统性红斑狼疮患者的24小时尿白蛋白定量,分析其与临床病程、疾病活动性及免疫学指标之间的关系。结果104例患者中72例(69.2%)24小时尿白蛋白升高。在尿常规检测尿蛋白阴性患者中,47.5%(29/61)的患者24小时尿白蛋白升高(微量白蛋白尿),其中在初治和复治患者中分别有48.7%(19/39)和45.5%(10/22)的患者24小时尿白蛋白升高;初治患者尿白蛋白升高组的SLEDAI评分[(10.2±3.6)分]和血沉[(62.9±37.1)mm/1 h]较尿白蛋白正常组[分别为(6.6±2.9)分和(40.2±29.5)mm/1 h]显著升高(P均<0.05),且伴有血白蛋白降低(10/19)和免疫球蛋白升高(5/19)的比例较正常组(分别为3/20和0/20)显著增加(P均<0.05);复治患者尿白蛋白升高组的SLEDAI评分[(6.5±3.5)分]也较正常组[(3.3±2.7)分]显著升高,且伴有贫血(4/10)和血清补体降低(7/10)的比例较正常组(分别为0/12和2/12)显著增加(P均<0.05)。结论检测微量白蛋白尿有助于早期发现系统性红斑狼疮患者的肾损害,并与疾病的活动度及严重性显著相关。 相似文献
5.
目的观察白芍总苷(TGP)联合来氟米特(LEF)治疗幼年慢性关节炎的疗效及安全性。方法选择诊断明确的JCR中少关节型、多关节型及全身型三种类型的患儿40例随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组给予TGP联合(LEF)治疗,对照组单用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗,观察患者关节症状改善程度、血沉变化情况以及药物不良反应。结果第4周时患者关节症状改善50%,明显高于对照组的30%(P<0.05).并且第4周时治疗组有效率65%明显高于对照组35%(P<0.05)。在不良反应发生方面,治疗组仅出现轻度腹泻,且发生率较低,而对照组部分病人出现纳差及肝功能的异常(P<0.05).结论使用TGP联合LEF治疗儿童慢性关节炎能很好缓解关节症状,缩短临床改善时间,且不良反应发生率低,患者耐受性好。 相似文献
6.
天气冷了,关节病进入发病高峰。关节病的种类多,应注意鉴别诊断,以便对症下药。关节病患者还应注意保暖,加强锻炼,保持心情舒畅,特别是每天早晨活动活动,可有效缓解关节疼痛。 相似文献
7.
8.
目的 探讨重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白(rhTNFR:Fc)对炎性关节炎患者关节置换术后恢复的影响.方法 回顾分析67例应用rhTNFR:Fc或传统改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)治疗的炎性关节炎患者行关节置换术后伤口感染发生例数、伤口愈合时间、炎症期时间(体温≥37.5 ℃)及抗生素应用时间.根据所应用药物分为rhTNFR:Fc组和传统DMARDs组.其中,rhTNFR:Fc组单用rhTNFR:Fc或rhTNFR:Fc联合传统DMARDs;传统DMARDs组单用或联合应用2种或2种以上传统DMARDs.统计学处理根据数据类型选择t检验或非参数检验.结果 67例患者中,rhTNFR:Fc组18例,传统DMARDs组49例.rhTNFR:Fc组1例出现伤口感染,传统DMARDs组0例,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).rhTNFR:Fc组炎症期时间为(4±3) d,传统DMARDs组为(3±3)d,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).rhTNFR:Fc组伤口愈合时间为(14.0±3.1)d,传统DMARDs组为(14.7±2.9)d,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).rhTNFR:Fc组术后抗生素应用时间为(14.8±9.3)d,传统DMARDs组为(10.3±2.7)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 炎性关节炎患者围手术期应用rhTNFR:Fc不增加关节置换术后伤口感染发生率,不延长伤口愈合时间及炎症期时间.Abstract: Objective To investigate the affect of rhTNFR:Fc on the postoperative recovery of patients with inflammatory arthritis after arthroplasty. Methods Patients with inflammatory arthritis undergoing arthroplasty were included and divided into rhTNFR:Fc group (rhTNFR:Fc only or combined with conven-tional DMARDs) and conventional DMARDs group (monotherapy with or combination of conventional DMARDs). We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postoperative infection, wound healing time, the febrile period (body temperature ≥37.5 ℃) and the duration of antibiotics treatment after arthroplasty. x2 test and t test were used for statistical analysis. Results Sixty-seven patients were included, 18 in the rhTNFR: Fc group and 49 in the conventional DMARDs group. One postoperative infection occurred in rhTNFR :Fc group but none in the DMARDs group. There was no significant difference by Fisher's exact test (P>0.05). The febrile duration was (4±3) days in the rhTNFR :Fc group and (3±3) days in the conventional DMARDs group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The wound healing time was (14.0±3.1) days in the rhTNFR :Fc group and (14.7±2.9) days in the conventional DMARDs group, which was not statistically different(P>0.05). The duration of antibiotics treatment after operation was (14.8±9.3) days in the rhTNFR: Fc group and (10.3±2.7) days in the conventional DMARDs group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Using rhTNFR:Fc during perioperative period in patients with inflammatory arthritis does not increase the risk of infectious complications or extending wound healing time and the febrile duration. 相似文献
9.
10.