Attitudes to water fluoridation in South Africa 1998. Part III. An analysis of pro- and anti-fluoridation attitudes in South Africa.

A survey on attitudes to water fluoridation in the South African population (N = 2,220) was undertaken in 1998. The purpose of this study was to evaluate responses to, and underlying reasons for pro- and anti-fluoridation attitudes. In response to a structured questionnaire, 61.9% of respondents were in favour of fluoride being added to drinking water and 9% were against it. Reasons supporting and opposing this measure were as follows. Of those who favoured the measure, 30% of respondents said it was because it would reduce tooth decay and 30% said it 'affects health', presumably positively. Other reasons include, 'it purifies water' (10.3%), 'more people will be reached' (9.8%), 'it strenghtens bones' (6%), 'it prevents plaque' (4.6%) and it 'improves the taste of water' (3.1%). There was a 1.3% 'don't know' response. Those opposed to the measure said, 'water should stay as it is' (26.1%), 'if it stays in the system it will create other problems' (15.6%), it 'affects health', presumably negatively (12.3%) and 'it will increase the cost of water' (8.8%). The 'don't know' response was 10.5%. When asked to give reasons for their 'don't know' response in the 'uncertain' category, 90% said they did not know. Given the contradictory and variable responses in both 'yes' and 'no' categories, the possible reasons for these findings could include: the differences between knowledge and beliefs, alternative health and lifestyle practices, levels of education, resistance to change and personality factors, among others. Understanding the assumption people make about fluoridation would help to structure education programmes to provide accurate and comprehensive information.     

Noma (cancrum oris): case report in a 4-year-old HIV-positive South African child.

Cancrum oris (noma) is a gangrenous infection that develops in the mouth and spreads rapidly to other parts of the face. The disease occurs mostly in conditions of poverty, poor hygiene and malnutrition. In sub-Saharan Africa the frequency in several countries is estimated to be 1-7 cases per 1,000 population, and as many as 12 cases per 1,000 in the most affected communities. About 90% of these children die without receiving any care, yet the disease can, and should, be prevented. With increasing numbers of children who are malnourished and who have compromised immune systems (compounded by the HIV pandemic) the prevalence of conditions such as noma is likely to increase. Among the earliest features of noma are excessive salivation, marked fetor oris, facial oedema and a greyish-black discolouration of the skin in the affected area. This devastating gangrenous lesion may involve the cheek, the chin, the infra-orbital margin, palate, nose, antrum and virtually any part of the face. This report describes a 4-year-old HIV-positive African girl, who was abandoned, discharged from the Plastics Unit and now lives in a child care sanctuary. Little is known about her history prior to her arrival at the home a few weeks previously. The clinical examination revealed a delay in growth and physical development equivalent to that of a 2-year-old child. The left cheek had a perforating ulcer in a healing phase. The perforation, about 1 cm in diameter, was surrounded by oedematous tissues showing a mild to moderate erythema. The peripheral oedema extended to the lower palpebral, the upper labial, left labial commissural, mandibular and pre-parotid regions. Submental, submandibular and cervical lymph nodes were mildly painful upon palpation. The child was not pyretic. The intra-oral examination revealed the features of acute necrotising gingivitis (ANG). ANG was generalised and showed classic interdental crater-like ulcers covered with whitish debris. Halitosis was pronounced. Examination of the second quadrant revealed a large ulcer extending from the distal aspect of the deciduous canine to the distal aspect of the second deciduous molar. The adjacent palatal mucosa was severely oedematous. The alveolar bone supporting the first and the second molars was completely exposed to the fundus of the vestibulum. It was not possible to obtain intraoral photographs or radiographs. Chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2% solution) and metronidazole tablets, 200 mg twice daily for 15 days were prescribed. The child was seen every alternate day for 10 days and her condition improved rapidly. Halitosis had subsided. She was then referred to the Johannesburg Hospital for further treatment under general anaesthesia. The proposed treatment plan was as follows: removal of dental accretions and polishing of all teeth, extraction of the left maxillary teeth supported by non-vital bone, resection of the necrotic bone in the left maxilla and reconstructive surgery in the left cheek.     

Industrial dental erosion: a cross-sectional, comparative study.

Occupational exposure to sulphuric acid mist (H2SO4) is a health hazard. The threshold limit value-time weighted average (TLV-TWA) of exposure to H2SO4 recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH, 1994-1996) is 1 mg/m3. This single-blind study conducted in an electro-winning facility in South Africa, compared dental erosion of anterior and premolar teeth of male workers exposed daily to H2SO4 in an exposed group (H2SO4 range: 0.3 mg/m3-1 mg/m3) and an unexposed group (H2SO4 range: 0.1 mg/m3-0.3 mg/m3). The exposed group comprised all workers at the facility exposed to the aforesaid range of H2SO4 (N = 103). A total of 102 unexposed subjects similar in composition with respect to age and length of service were randomly selected from the rest of the 700 workers at the facility. A questionnaire was administered to seek information on possible worker habits associated with dental erosion and to determine perceptions of oral function. Clinical examinations assessed prevalence and severity of dental erosion. The mean age of subjects was 31.4 years and mean length of service 4.2 years. In the exposed group 48% complained of pain and sensitivity on their teeth compared with the 31% of unexposed persons (P = 0.020). Dental erosion was present in exposed (96%) and unexposed (75%) subjects. Exposed subjects were more likely to develop erosion than unexposed subjects, the odds ratio being 5.531 within the confidence limits 2.167 < OR < 14.117. There was a significant difference in the severity of tooth surface loss between exposed and unexposed groups (P = 0.001). Dental erosion was most severe in the anterior teeth and occurred mostly on the labial and incisal surfaces.