Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on Proximal Caries Infiltration: Three-Year Follow-Up

We report the 3-year efficacy of resin infiltration (Icon, pre-product; DMG, Hamburg) to arrest progression of proximal non-cavitated caries lesions as compared with placebo treatment. In 22 young adults, 29 lesion pairs with radiographic extensions into the inner half of enamel up to the outer third of dentin were included (split-mouth design). All subjects received risk-related instructions for diet, flossing and fluoridation. No unwanted effects could be observed. Radiographically 1/26 test lesions (4%) and 11/26 control lesions (42%) had progressed (p = 0.002, McNemar). After 3-year follow-up, infiltration of proximal caries lesions can be said to be efficacious to reduce lesion progression.     

Longevity and Risk Factors of Post Restorations after up to 15 Years: A Practice-based Study

IntroductionThe aims of this multicenter, practice-based cohort study were to evaluate the success and survival of endodontically treated teeth with post restorations (ETT+Ps) and to analyze factors associated with the longevity of ETT+Ps.MethodsEight general dental practitioners each placed up to 27 ETT+Ps without any restriction to post materials or dimensions. Only incisors, canines, and premolars were included. At the last follow-up visit, ETT+Ps were considered as successful if the post and the initially placed definitive restoration were sufficient, whereas ETT+Ps were considered as survived if the post was still in function. Multilevel Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between a range of predictors and time until no success and no survival.ResultsOverall, 195 endodontic posts in 195 patients were followed up for a mean (95% confidence interval) of 91 (81–101) months; the longest follow-up was 15 years. Of these, 122 ETT+Ps were considered successful (estimated success time = 110 [101–120] months), and 152 ETT+Ps survived [estimated survival time = 133 [124–141] months). Regarding the categories of success and survival, the annual failure rates were 6.0% and 3.3%, respectively. Recementation of old (telescopic) crowns after placing new posts was the only significant predictor for decreased time until failure for both success and survival analyses. By excluding recemented restorations, annual failure rates decreased to 3.5% and 2.1%, respectively.ConclusionsFor EET+Ps placed in a private practice setting, high success and survival rates were observed. If old (telescopic) crowns were recemented after new posts were placed, the high risk of subsequent failure should be considered and communicated with patients.     

Penetration depths of an infiltrant into proximal caries lesions in primary molars after different application times in vitro

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2012; 22: 349–355 Background. Caries infiltration aims to inhibit lesion progression, by occluding the porosities within the lesion body with low‐viscosity resins. The ability in hampering lesion progression is correlated with the penetration depth (PD) of the infiltrant. Aim. This study aimed to compare the infiltration depths into proximal lesions in primary molars after different application times. Design. Noncavitated natural caries lesions (n = 83) were etched with 15% HCl for 2 min and infiltrated for 0.5, 1, 3, or 5 min. Specimens were sectioned and PD at the maximum lesion depth (LD_max) were analysed using dual fluorescence confocal microscopy. Results. Percentage penetrations (PD/LD_max) were significantly higher after 3 or 5 min compared with 0.5‐min application (P < 0.05; Mann–Whitney test). For LD_max <400 μm, no significant differences were observed between application times (P > 0.05). For LD_max≥400 μm, 3‐ and 5‐min application resulted in significantly deeper infiltration compared with 0.5 min (P < 0.05). After 1‐min application, PD was significantly lower than 5 min (P < 0.05), PD/LD_max did not differ from all other groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions. Natural noncavitated proximal lesions in primary molars were deeply infiltrated after 1‐min application in vitro. For deeper lesions, however, more consistent results were obtained after 3 min.     

Effects of regular and highly fluoridated toothpastes in combination with saliva substitutes on artificial enamel caries lesions differing in mineral content

ObjectiveFor patients with hyposalivation fluorides are supportive to prevent caries lesions. Remineralization of subsurface lesions might be improved by toothpastes containing 5000 μg F^?/g compared with those having 1400 μg F^?/g. This could be influenced by the degree of baseline mineralization. Therefore, this in vitro study evaluated the effects of fluoride toothpastes differing in fluoride concentration in combination with de- and remineralizing saliva substitutes using two lesion types.DesignSpecimens with shallow (SL; ΔZ (SD): 1915 (543) vol% × μm) or deep lesions (DL; 5804 (427) vol% × μm) were either stored in mineral water [saturation with respect to octacalcium phosphate (S_OCP): 0.5], demineralizing experimental (Exp, S_OCP: 0.3), demineralizing commercial (Glandosane, S_OCP: 0.3), or remineralizing saliva substitute (modified Saliva natura; S_OCP: 1.9) for five weeks (37 °C). Either one of three brushing procedures was performed additionally three times daily: no brushing, Elmex anticaries toothpaste (E; 1400 μg F^?/g), Duraphat toothpaste (D; 5000 μg F^?/g). Mineral parameters before and after storage were evaluated using microradiographs.ResultsStorage in Exp as well as Glandosane induced a significant demineralization (p < 0.05; relatively more pronounced in SL than DL). Additional brushing in particular with D reduced these effects. Storage alone in modified Saliva natura remineralized specimens (p < 0.05).ConclusionsUnder the in vitro conditions chosen shallow lesions seem to be more susceptible for demineralization compared with deeper ones when stored in an undersaturated (with respect to OCP) saliva substitute. The highly fluoridated toothpaste seemed to be more beneficial than a regular one.     

Initial in situ secondary caries formation: effect of various fluoride-containing restorative materials

This study evaluated the effects of various restorative materials (Ariston pHc; Dyract; Vitremer; Tetric Ceram; Compoglass F, F2000; Hytac and Ketac Molar) on initial secondary caries formation in situ. Eighty-eight enamel slabs from sound human molars were sterilized (ethylene dioxide) and embedded in epoxy resin. Standardized tooth preparations were filled with the various restorative materials according to manufacturers' recommendations. One specimen from each group was inserted into one of two buccal aspects of an intraoral appliance worn by 11 volunteers for four weeks, day and night. Oral hygiene was performed without additional fluoride application. During meals and oral hygiene procedures, the appliances were stored in sucrose solution (10%). After in situ exposure, the samples were prepared for microradiographic assessment. Mineral content and lesion depth were evaluated by a dedicated software package (TMR 1.24). Lesion depth and mineral loss of the carious lesions close to Ariston pHc was significantly lower when compared to distant parts of the same lesions (p < 0.05; t-test, Bonferroni-Holm correction). All other materials containing fluoride showed no caries protective effect on surrounding enamel (p > 0.05; t-test, Bonferroni-Holm correction). A hydroxyl-, calcium- and fluoride-containing restorative material hampers demineralization next to the restoration, whereas, fluoride release of various fluoride-containing restorative materials does not affect demineralization of adjacent enamel in situ.     

Effects of dentifrices differing in fluoride compounds on artificial enamel caries lesions in vitro

The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect of a stabilized stannous fluoride/sodium fluoride dentifrice containing sodium hexametaphosphate with those of a regular, solely sodium fluoride-containing and amine fluoride-containing dentifrice on pre-demineralized bovine enamel specimens using a pH-cycling model. Bovine enamel specimens with two artificial lesions each were prepared. Baseline mineral loss of both lesions was analyzed using transversal microradiography (TMR). Eighty-five specimens with a mean (SD) baseline mineral loss of 3393 (683) vol% × µm were selected and randomly allocated to five groups (n = 13/15). Treatments during pH-cycling (28 days and 2 × 20 min demineralization/day) were: brushing twice daily with slurries of AmF (1400 ppm F^?), NaF (1450 ppm F^?), SnF₂/NaF (1100 ppm F^?/350 ppm F^?), and fluoride-free (FF) dentifrices or they were immersed in distilled water and remained unbrushed (NB). Subsequently, from each specimen one lesion was covered with acid-resistant varnish, while the remaining lesion was demineralized for another 14 days. Differences in integrated mineral loss (??Z) were calculated between values before and after pH-cycling (??Z _E1) as well as before pH-cycling and after second demineralization (??Z _E2) using TMR. Treatments AmF and NaF induced a significantly higher mineral gain (??Z _E1/??Z _E2) compared to treatments FF and NB (p < 0.05; ANOVA test). Except for treatments AmF and NaF no significant differences in mineral loss between before and after pH-cycling could be observed (p < 0.05; t test) [??Z _E1: AmF:1563 (767); NaF:1222 (1246); SnF₂/NaF:258 (1259); FF:?52 (1223); NB:?151 (834)]. Both dentifrices with either AmF or NaF promoted remineralization, whereas SnF₂/NaF dentifrice did not promote remineralization in a biofilm-free pH-cycling model.     

Progression of sealed initial bovine enamel lesions under demineralizing conditions in vitro

The use of sealants for the infiltration of proximal enamel lesions could be a promising alternative to the common strategies of remineralization and operative treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare the progression of sealed initial enamel lesions after exposure to a demineralizing solution in vitro. In each of 54 bovine enamel specimens three subsurface lesions were created. Two of the lesions were etched with phosphoric acid and sealed with either a fissure sealant or with various adhesives (1-5) for 15 s or 30 s, respectively, whereas one lesion remained as the untreated control. Subsequently, half of each specimen was covered with nail varnish (baseline) and the other half was reexposed to a demineralizing solution for 14 days (experimental). The specimens were cut perpendicularly to the surface, infiltrated with a low-viscosity fluorescent resin and observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). For lesions sealed with the fissure sealant and adhesives 1-3, the progression of lesion depth (0-31 microm) was significantly decreased (p<0.01; paired t test) compared with the untreated control (57 microm). For the fissure sealant and adhesives 1 and 3 extended penetration times (30 s) resulted in significantly reduced lesion progression compared to 15 s. It can be concluded that filling of the pores in initial enamel lesions with the fissure sealant and adhesives 1-3 can inhibit further demineralization in vitro.     

Evaluation of cavitations in proximal caries lesions at various magnification levels in vitro

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cavitation rate of proximal caries using different magnification aids in vitro.

Methods

Radiographs of 285 extracted teeth were taken and the proximal surfaces were graded to the criteria R0 (no radiolucency), R1 (radiolucency confined to the outer half of enamel), R2 (inner half of enamel) and R3 (outer half of dentin). Subsequently, the proximal surfaces were checked for the presence of cavitations with the naked eye (NE), and by using 4.3× magnification eyeglasses (ME), a stereo microscope (SM, 10×), or a scanning electron microscope (SEM, up to 2000× magnification).

Results

In surfaces with R3 caries, cavitations were visible in 56 of 59 cases with the naked eye. When using SEM, all surfaces revealed cavitations (100%). Regarding the surfaces with R2 lesion, 36 of 46 cases showed cavitations (NE); the corresponding values were 39/46 (ME), 41/46 (SM), and 46/46 (SEM); in the latter, in most cases deep defects could be observed. With regard to R1 lesions, 36/60 (NE), 43/60 (ME), 45/60 (SM), and 58/60 (SEM) cases revealed cavitations. A breakdown of radiographically sound surfaces (R0) was present in some 10% of the examined surfaces (24/261, NE; 33/261, SEM).

Conclusions

Cavitations (defined as breakdown of the surface) are present in significantly more cases than previously reported. This might be an explanation why even small radiolucencies tend to progress, albeit slowly. Thus, close follow-ups should strongly be recommended when considering a preventive treatment regimen with small radiolucencies.     

Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: influence of the application procedure

This study compared the progression of sealed initial enamel lesions penetrated with a fissure sealant (Helioseal, Vivadent) or various adhesives (Heliobond, Excite, Vivadent; Resulcin, Merz; Solobond M, Voco; Prompt L-Pop, 3M-ESPE) after exposure to a demineralizing solution, in vitro. From 27 bovine teeth, 54 enamel specimens were prepared and covered with nail varnish (control), thus obtaining three windows for treatment. After demineralization (pH 5.0; 14 days), two of the windows (A, B) were etched with phosphoric acid (20%; 5 seconds); whereas, the third area served as the control (C). The specimens were divided randomly into six groups (n=9), and the material was applied (90 seconds) either once (A) or twice (B). Light-curing followed each application. Half of the area of each specimen window was then covered with nail varnish, and the samples were again stored in the demineralizing solution (pH 5.0; 14 days). The specimens were cut perpendicular to the surface, and both enamel slabs were studied after infiltration using a fluorescent, low viscous resin (VIRIN) and confocal microscopy (CLSM). Lesion depths were calculated (ImageJ) from the surface to that point in the lesion where the grey values clearly changed to a darker grey. After demineralization, mean lesion depths (SD) (14 days) were measured at 105 (21) microm. The second demineralization led to a mean progression of the lesion depths of 52 (31)%. Adper Prompt L-Pop and Solobond M could not significantly prevent lesion progression after a single application (p > 0.05; t-test); however, the second application of Solobond M significantly decreased lesion progression (p < 0.05; t-test). Helioseal, Heliobond, Resulcin Monobond and Excite showed significantly better inhibition of the demineralization compared to the other materials (p < 0.05; Bonferroni). It can be concluded that the penetration of adhesives into initial lesions inhibited a further demineralization in vitro.