Epinephrine for the out-of-hospital (first-aid) treatment of anaphylaxis in infants: Is the ampule/syringe/needle method practical?

BACKGROUND: Little information is available about administration of an accurate epinephrine dose to infants experiencing anaphylaxis outside the hospital setting. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to perform a prospective, controlled study of (1) the time needed by parents to draw up an infant epinephrine dose from an ampule and (2) the dose accuracy. METHODS: We gave 18 parents written instructions and asked them to draw up epinephrine 0.09 mL. We timed them by means of a stopwatch and measured the epinephrine content (in micrograms) in each dose by using HPLC-UV. Eighteen resident physicians, 18 general duty nurses, and 18 emergency department nurses served as controls. RESULTS: The parents took significantly longer (P < .05) than the controls to draw up the dose; the mean (+/- SEM) times were 142 +/- 13 seconds (range, 83-248) for the parents, 52 +/- 3 seconds (range, 30-83) for the physicians, 40 +/- 2 seconds (range, 26-71) for the general duty nurses, and 29 +/- 0.09 seconds (range, 27-33) for the emergency department nurses. The control groups did not differ significantly from each other in speed (P > .05). The epinephrine content of the doses drawn up by the parents ranged 40-fold in contrast to the physicians' doses (7- to 8-fold), general duty nurses' doses (3-fold), and emergency department nurses' doses (2-fold). The mean epinephrine content did not differ significantly (P > .05) among the 4 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Most parents were unable to draw up an infant epinephrine dose rapidly or accurately. Most health care professionals drew up the dose rapidly; however, their accuracy was compromised by inherent variations of epinephrine concentrations in the ampules (United States Pharmacopeia compendial limits, 90% to 115%) and the inherent difficulty of measuring low volumes (<0.1 mL) of epinephrine. User-friendly premeasured epinephrine doses suitable for infants should be developed.     

Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders associated with whiplash injury in Lithuania

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to ascertain the prevalence of symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in whiplash victims in Lithuania and compare it with the prevalence in otherwise healthy control subjects. STUDY DESIGN: In a controlled historical cohort study in Lithuania, we asked each of 210 victims of vehicular rear-end collisions (at 14-27 months after the accident) to report the presence and frequency of a number of temporomandibular disorder symptoms. The results were compared with those for an age-matched and gender-matched control group, sampled randomly from the local population. RESULTS: In the accident group, 2.4% of subjects (4/165) reported jaw pain for 1 day or more per month; this compared with 3.3% of the controls (6/180). One (0.6%) of the accident victims and 2 (1.1%) of the controls had daily jaw pain. In both groups there was a low prevalence of jaw sounds, pain in or near the ear(s), jaw locking, tinnitus, and facial pain. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike whiplash claimants in many Western societies, Lithuanian accident victims do not appear to report the chronic symptoms of temporomandibular disorders despite their acute whiplash injuries.