首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   3篇
  免费   0篇
口腔科学   3篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   1篇
  2012年   1篇
排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Objectives:To evaluate the effects of bite-raising with light-cured orthodontic band cement, a method commonly used in contemporary orthodontic treatment, on masticatory function, as assessed by objective and subjective methods.Materials and Methods:The objective evaluation of masticatory performance and subjective evaluation of masticatory ability were performed on 30 healthy volunteers (19 females and 11 males, 22.3 ± 1.56 years) with a normal occlusion. Assessment was performed before and immediately after bite-raising. The bite-raising was done by adding light-cured orthodontic band cement (3 × 5 × 2-mm width × length × height) on the palatal cusps of the upper first molars. The masticatory performance index (MPI) was calculated from chewed test food particles using a sieving method. For the subjective evaluation, the participants performed the food intake ability (FIA) test using a questionnaire with six types of food. The correlation between the evaluation methods was determined.Results:The MPI and FIA scores of the participants were significantly reduced after bite-raising (P < .001). The MPI and FIA score reduction was not significantly different between females and males. No significant correlations were found between the changes in MPI and FIA scores.Conclusions:Masticatory function after bite-raising with light-cured orthodontic band cement was immediately reduced, both objectively and subjectively. However, because there was no significant correlation between the objective and subjective results, an individual may not perceive his/her decreased masticatory ability to the same degree as masticatory performance was reduced. Further study is required to evaluate the long-term adaptation to this bite-raising method.  相似文献   
2.

Purpose

To evaluate the literature on the stability of open bite treatment using extraction or non-extraction methods.

Methods

Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane library were electronically searched until December 2017. Studies were considered for evaluation if they reported overbite measurements pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at least 1-year post-retention for non-surgical orthodontic patients with permanent dentition, treated by extraction or non-extraction methods The risk of bias of the selected articles was assessed.

Results

The search retrieved 985 articles, only 6 articles were included after applying the selection criteria. Two articles were case-control studies, and the other four were case series studies. The mean stability rates were 93.53% and 73.68% in extraction and non-extraction cases, respectively. Because each included study presented data of either the extraction or non-extraction method, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis by pooling the results of the studies to compare the two methods. However, meta-analysis was conducted to compare the overbite between post-treatment and post-retention within each method. The results showed no significant change in extraction cases (mean difference (MD) 0.49, 95% CI ?0.18–1.16; P = 0.15), but showed a significant change in non-extraction cases (MD 1.12, 95% CI 0.77–1.46; P < 0.00001).

Conclusions

Our findings indicated no significant relapse in extraction cases, but a significant relapse in non-extraction cases. However, due to no direct comparison, the optimum treatment method for open bite patients with permanent dentition remains questionable. Further studies with a high level of evidence that compare both treatment methods are needed to draw a definitive conclusion.  相似文献   
3.
The jaw‐opening reflex (JOR) plays an important role in the regulation of jaw movement during mastication. Previous study showed that altered masticatory function during growth impedes JOR maturation and thus may affect masticatory performance in adults. However, no studies have compared the benefit of early and delayed correction in terms of functional development. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that early‐stimulation of masticatory function during growth can promote JOR maturation better than late‐stimulation during adulthood. Soon after weaning, 120 female Wistar rats were divided into two groups and fed either solid (control group) or liquid (experimental group) diets. The experimental group was further divided into early‐, late‐, and non‐stimulation subgroups. Early‐ and late‐stimulation groups were fed a solid diet instead of a liquid diet at 5‐ and 11‐week‐old, respectively, whereas non‐stimulation group was fed only a liquid diet until the end of the experiment. At 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 weeks, JOR recordings were conducted in anaesthetised rats of all groups. Latency and peak‐to‐peak amplitude of the JOR were compared between the groups. From 7 to 13 weeks, early‐stimulation group showed a JOR with short latency and high amplitude similar to that of control group. In contrast, late‐ and non‐stimulation groups showed significantly longer latency and smaller amplitude of the JOR than in control group. We demonstrated that early masticatory stimulation within the critical period for programming mastication may have greater potential to restore JOR maturation to values close to those in normal adults.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号