Recombinant allergens Pru av 1 and Pru av 4 and a newly identified lipid transfer protein in the in vitro diagnosis of cherry allergy

BACKGROUND: In central and northern Europe food allergy to fruits of the Rosaceae family is strongly associated with birch pollinosis because of the existence of IgE cross-reactive homologous allergens in birch pollen and food. By contrast, in the Mediterranean population allergic reactions to these fruits frequently are not related to birch pollen allergy and are predominantly elicited by lipid transfer proteins (LTPs). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of IgE sensitization to the recombinant cherry allergens Pru av 1 and Pru av 4 in comparison with cherry extract within a representative group of patients who were allergic to cherries recruited in Germany and to compare the relevance of IgE to cherry LTPs in Italian patients. METHODS: Recombinant Pru av 1 and rPru av 4 were available from earlier studies. The cDNA of the cherry LTPs was obtained by using a PCR-cloning strategy. The protein was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by means of metal chelate affinity chromatography. Sera from 101 German patients with birch pollinosis and oral allergy syndrome to cherry and sera from 7 Italian patients with cherry allergy were investigated by using enzyme allergosorbent tests for IgE reactivity with cherry extract, rPru av 1, rPru av 4, and the recombinant cherry LTP. Inhibition experiments were performed to compare the IgE reactivity of natural and recombinant cherry LTPs and to investigate potential cross-reactivity with birch pollen allergens. RESULTS: The LTP from cherry comprises 91 amino acids and a 26 amino acid signal peptide. The mature cherry LTP shows high amino acid sequence identity with allergenic LTPs from peach (Pru p 3, 88%), apricot (Pru ar 3, 86%), and maize (Zea m 14, 59%) and displays no IgE cross-reactivity with birch pollen. The IgE prevalences in the German patients were as follows: LTP, 3 of 101 (3%); rPru av 1, 97 of 101 (96.0%); rPru av 4, 16 of 101 (16.2%); and cherry extract, 98 of 101 (97%). All 7 Italian patients had IgE against the cherry LTP. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant allergens are useful tools for a more accurate in vitro IgE-based diagnosis of cherry allergy. Taken together, they mimic the allergenic activity of cherry extract, having slightly higher biologic activity. Sensitization to the cherry LTP is relevant for a minority of patients recruited in Germany, but our data indicate that it may be a major allergen in Italy.     

IgE reactivity to profilin in pollen-sensitized subjects with adverse reactions to banana and pineapple

BACKGROUND: The so-called 'latex-fruit syndrome' is a well-documented phenomenon in cross-reactive allergies. By contrast, there is a lack of information about allergy to exotic fruits in patients with a predominant pollen sensitization. Since the ubiquitous protein profilin has been identified as an allergen in natural rubber latex as well as in pollen-related foods, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of profilin in allergy to certain exotic fruits. METHODS: Recombinant profilins from banana and pineapple were cloned by a PCR technique after isolation of total RNA using degenerated profilin-specific primers. The unknown 5' ends of copy DNA (cDNA) were identified by rapid amplification of 5'cDNA ends (5'-RACE) and expression in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells. The recombinant profilins were purified by affinity chromatography using poly-(L)-proline as the solid phase. IgE-binding capabilities were characterized by means of immunoblot and Enzyme Allergosorbent Test (EAST). The cross-reactivity to birch pollen profilin and latex profilin was studied by EAST as well as by immunoblot inhibition experiments. RESULTS: Both banana and pineapple profilin were found to consist of 131 amino acid residues with high amino acid sequence identity to known allergenic pollen and food profilins (71-84%). IgE binding to the recombinant profilins was observed in 7/16 sera from subjects with suspected banana allergy (44%) and in 8/19 sera from subjects with suspected pineapple allergy (42%). Inhibition experiments indicated similar IgE reactivity of natural and recombinant allergens. In addition, high cross-reactivity to birch pollen profilin Bet v 2 and latex profilin Hev b 8 was demonstrated by immunoblot inhibition as well as EAST inhibition experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Since a high IgE-binding prevalence of about 40% was obtained in both banana and pineapple allergy, we conclude that profilin is an important mediator of IgE cross-reactivity between pollen and exotic fruits.     

Cross-reactivity within the profilin panallergen family investigated by comparison of recombinant profilins from pear (Pyr c 4), cherry (Pru av 4) and celery (Api g 4) with birch pollen profilin Bet v 2.

Profilin is a panallergen which is recognised by IgE from about 20% of birch pollen- and plant food-allergic patients. Little is known about epitope diversity among these homologous proteins, and about the correlation between IgE-cross-reactivity and allergenic reactivity. Plant food profilins from pear (Pyr c 4) and cherry (Pru av 4) were cloned by polymerase chain reaction and produced in Escherichia coli BL21. The profilins were purified as non-fusion proteins by affinity chromatography on poly-(L-proline)-Sepharose and characterized by immunoblotting, IgE-inhibition experiments and histamine release assays. The coding regions of the cDNA of pear and cherry profilin were identified as a 393 bp open reading frame. The deduced amino acid sequences showed high identities with birch pollen profilin Bet v 2 (76-83%) and other allergenic plant profilins. Pyr c 4 and Pru av 4 were investigated for their immunological properties in comparison with profilins from celery (Api g 4) and birch pollen (Bet v 2). Fourty-three of 49 patients (88%), preselected for an IgE-reactivity with Bet v 2 showed specific IgE-antibodies to the recombinant pear protein, 92% of the sera were positive with the recombinant cherry allergen and 80% of the sera were reactive with the celery protein. Inhibition experiments showed a strong cross-reactivity of IgE with profilins from plant food and birch pollen. However, IgE binding profiles also indicated the presence of epitope differences among related profilins. All investigated profilins, Pyr c 4, Pru av 4, Api g 4 and Bet v 2, presented almost identical allergenic properties in cellular mediator release tests. Therefore, cross-reactivities between related profilins may explain pollen-related allergy to food in a minority of patients. The nucleotide sequences reported have been submitted to the Genbank database under accession numbers AF129424 (Pyr c 4) and AF129425 (Pru av 4).     

Cloning of the minor allergen Api g 4 profilin from celery (Apium graveolens) and its cross-reactivity with birch pollen profilin Bet v 2

BACKGROUND: Profilin is a panallergen that is recognized by IgE from about 20% of birch pollen- and plant food-allergic patients. A subgroup of celery-allergic patients shows IgE-reactivity with this minor allergen. To investigate the IgE-binding potential and cross-reactivity of celery profilin at the molecular level, this study was aimed at the cloning and immunological characterization of this allergen. OBJECTIVES: Cloning, expression and purification of profilin from celery tuber to characterize its immunological properties and its cross-reactivity with birch pollen profilin. METHODS: Cloning of celery profilin was performed by polymerase chain reaction using degenerated primers and a 5'RACE method for the identification of the unknown 5'-end of the cDNA. Expression was carried out in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) using a modified vector pET-30a. The recombinant profilin was purified by affinity chromatography on poly L-proline coupled to sepharose. Immunological characterization was performed by immunoblotting, EAST and IgE-inhibition experiments. RESULTS: The coding region of the cDNA of celery profilin was identified as a 399-bp open reading frame, coding for a protein of 133 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of 14.3 kDa. The deduced amino acid sequence of the corresponding protein showed high identity with other plant profilins (71-82%) recently described as allergens. Celery profilin was isolated as highly pure nonfusion protein. The IgE-reactivity of celery profilin was similar to that of natural protein. Seven of 17 celery-allergic patients tested presented specific IgE-antibodies to the recombinant protein tested by immunoblotting. Inhibition experiments showed high cross-reactivity of IgE with both profilins from celery and birch pollen. Moreover, the biological activity of recombinant celery profilin was demonstrated by a histamine release assay. CONCLUSIONS: Celery profilin is an important allergenic compound in celery and shows high homology to birch pollen profilin, Bet v 2. According to the revised IUIS allergen nomenclature, we suggest naming the celery profilin Api g 4. In addition to the cross-reacting major allergens Api g 1 and Bet v 1, birch pollinosis and associated allergies to celery can therefore additionally be explained by the cross-reactivity between homologous profilins. Moreover, recombinant Api g 4 may be used for target-specific diagnosis and structural analyses.     

Establishment of a human 3D lung cancer model based on a biological tissue matrix combined with a Boolean in silico model

For the development of new treatment strategies against cancer, understanding signaling networks and their changes upon drug response is a promising approach to identify new drug targets and biomarker profiles. Pre‐requisites are tumor models with multiple read‐out options that accurately reflect the clinical situation. Tissue engineering technologies offer the integration of components of the tumor microenvironment which are known to impair drug response of cancer cells. We established three‐dimensional (3D) lung carcinoma models on a decellularized tissue matrix, providing a complex microenvironment for cell growth. For model generation, we used two cell lines with (HCC827) or without (A549) an activating mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), exhibiting different sensitivities to the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib. EGFR activation in HCC827 was inhibited by gefitinib, resulting in a significant reduction of proliferation (Ki‐67 proliferation index) and in the induction of apoptosis (TUNEL staining, M30‐ELISA). No significant effect was observed in conventional cell culture. Results from the 3D model correlated with the results of an in silico model that integrates the EGFR signaling network according to clinical data. The application of TGFβ1 induced tumor cell invasion, accompanied by epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) both in vitro and in silico. This was confirmed in the 3D model by acquisition of mesenchymal cell morphology and modified expression of fibronectin, E‐cadherin, β‐catenin and mucin‐1. Quantitative read‐outs for proliferation, apoptosis and invasion were established in the complex 3D tumor model. The combined in vitro and in silico model represents a powerful tool for systems analysis.     

Influence of food processing on the allergenicity of celery: DBPCFC with celery spice and cooked celery in patients with celery allergy

BACKGROUND: Celery root is often consumed in a processed form as a cooked vegetable or as a spice. So far, however, there has been no information about the allergenicity of processed celery in celery-allergic patients. METHODS: In 12 patients with a history of allergic reactions to raw or raw and cooked celery, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) with raw celery (n = 10), cooked celery (110 degrees C/15 min; n = 11), and celery spice (n = 5) were performed. Nine patients underwent an open mucosal challenge with four samples of canned celery retorted at Co-values (cooking effect) of 7.45-76.07 (corresponding to the time periods in minutes at a thermal influence of 100 degrees C). IgE immunoblot analysis of celery extract was performed with sera of all challenged patients. The thermal stability of celery allergen was investigated by enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST) inhibition. Furthermore, intraperitoneal immunization of mice followed by a rat basophil leukemia (RBL) cell mediator release assay was used as a biological in vitro model to assess the allergenicity of processed celery. RESULTS: Six out of 11 patients showed a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery and five out of five patients to celery spice. Allergenicity of celery was preserved in four patients with a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery even if celery was treated at a Co-value of 76.07. Patients with positive DBPCFC to cooked celery reacted to known celery allergens (Api g 1, Api g 4, cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants CCD). EAST inhibition showed that heat resistance of celery allergens decreases in the following order: CCD > Api g 4 > Api g 1. Accordingly, five of six patients with a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery were sensitized to profilin and/or CCD. The murine model reflected the reactivity of patients sensitized to the major allergen Api g 1. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In a subset of patients with a positive DBPCFC to cooked celery, celery remains allergenic even after extended thermal treatment (76.07 min/100 degrees C). 2) Celery spice is allergenic for patients with an allergy to raw celery. 3) RBL cells sensitized with mouse IgE to raw celery may serve as a useful tool for screening the potential allergenicity of heat-processed products containing celery.