Intrathecal Ziconotide in the Treatment of Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: A Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trial

Objective. The safety and efficacy of intrathecal (IT) ziconotide was studied in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Materials and Methods. Patients (169 ziconotide, 86 placebo) with severe chronic nonmalignant pain unresponsive to conventional therapy and a visual analog scale of pain intensity (VASPI score) ≥ 50 mm were treated over a 6‐day period in an inpatient hospital setting. Initial starting dose was 0.4 µg/hour and was titrated to analgesia or intolerance (maximum dose 7.0 µg/hour). The starting and maximum doses were reduced to 0.1 µg/hour and 2.4 µg/hour, respectively, due to adverse events (AEs). Results. The mean percent reduction in VASPI score from baseline was 31.2% and 6.0% for ziconotide‐ and placebo‐treated patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). During the initial titration phase, a significantly greater percentage of patients in the ziconotide group compared to the placebo group reported AEs, including abnormal gait, amblyopia, dizziness, nausea, nystagmus, pain, urinary retention, and vomiting. Conclusion. Ziconotide provided significant analgesia in patients for whom conventional therapy failed. However, there was a considerable incidence of ziconotide‐associated AEs due to the rapid titration and high doses administered.     

Efficacy of radiology of the esophagus for evaluation of dysphagia

The efficacy of radiology in evaluating dysphagia was studied in 86 patients by comparison to endoscopic findings. In the 66 patients with endoscopic abnormalities radiology was correct in 54, for a sensitivity of 82%. Sensitivity of radiology improved to 95% if mild esophagitis was excluded. In the 20 patients with normal endoscopy, radiology was normal in 18 (90%). Thus radiology proved to be a reliable means of evaluating the esophagus in patients with dysphagia.     

Scalp electrical recording during paralysis: quantitative evidence that EEG frequencies above 20 Hz are contaminated by EMG.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the possible contribution of electromyogram (EMG) to scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms at rest and induced or evoked by cognitive tasks. METHODS: Scalp EEG recordings were made on two subjects in presence and absence of complete neuromuscular blockade, sparing the dominant arm. The subjects undertook cognitive tasks in both states to allow direct comparison of electrical recordings. RESULTS: EEG rhythms in the paralysed state differed significantly compared with the unparalysed state, with 10- to 200-fold differences in the power of frequencies above 20 Hz during paralysis. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the scalp EEG recording above 20 Hz is of EMG origin. Previous studies measuring gamma EEG need to be re-evaluated. SIGNIFICANCE: This has a significant impact on measurements of gamma rhythms from the scalp EEG in unparalysed humans. It is to be hoped that signal separation methods will be able to rectify this situation.     

Interaction of permanently charged chlorpromazine and dopamine analogs with the striatal D-1 dopaminergic receptor

Although a structural feature common to all dopaminergic agonists and antagonists is a side-chain basic amino group, it is unclear whether this moiety binds to the D-1 dopamine (DA) receptor in the charged or uncharged form. To obtain information on this point, we synthesized permanently charged dimethylsulfonium and quaternary ammonium analogs of chlorpromazine and DA and determined whether these compounds can bind to the D-1 receptor by measuring their abilities to inhibit the binding of SCH 23390, a D-1 receptor antagonist. Chlorpromazine and the dimethylsulfonium and trimethylammonium analogs of chlorpromazine were found to inhibit the binding of [3H]SCH 22390, which was maximally inhibited to the same extent by all three compounds. In addition, inhibition curves for the compounds fit a one-site binding model, indicating binding to a single class of sites. However, while the permanently charged chlorpromazine analogs were able to inhibit [3H]SCH-23390 binding, they were considerably less potent than chlorpromazine. DA and dimethyl DA were also able to inhibit [3H]SCH 23390 binding. However, the permanently charged dimethylsulfonium and trimethylammonium analogs of DA were ineffective in inhibiting [3H]SCH 23390 binding. In addition, the permanently uncharged methylsulfide analog did not inhibit binding. These studies show that permanently charged analogs of chlorpromazine can bind to the striatal D-1 receptor, which is consistent with an anionic recognition site on the D-1 receptor that interacts with antagonists in the cationic form. In addition, it appears that a nitrogen atom is not required for binding to the D-1 receptor, since the sulfonium analog of chlorpromazine bound to the receptor to the same extent as chlorpromazine. However, since the permanently charged or uncharged analogs of DA did not bind to the D-1 receptor, it is still unclear as to whether the charged form of a dopaminergic agonist can bind. The lower potency or ineffectiveness of the permanently charged analogs compared to the parent amines (chlorpromazine, DA, dimethyl DA) in binding to the D-1 receptor may reflect the inability of the permanently charged analogs to undergo hydrogen binding with the anionic site of the receptor.