Episodic variations of prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, melatonin and cortisol in infertile women with subclinical hypothyroidism

Preliminary data have suggested that female infertility due to corpus luteum insufficiency may be caused by subclinical hypothyroidism [exaggerated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) response to thyrotrophin- releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation]. L-Thyroxine supplementation has been recommended to achieve pregnancies in subclinical hypothyroid women. This controlled study was carried out in order to investigate the biochemical diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroidism as a possible infertility factor. Five infertile patients (aged 25-36 years) with subclinical hypothyroidism (n = 4, stimulated TSH >20 microU/ml) or primary hypothyroidism (n = 1) and five healthy controls (aged 22-39 years) with normal thyroid function (stimulated TSH <15 microU/ml), regular cycles and no history of infertility were studied in the early follicular phase. In the pre-study evaluation, eight of 23 volunteers (34.8%) had to be excluded because of subclinical hypothyroidism with stimulated TSH values (TSHs) >15 microU/ml. Cycle function of patients and controls was compared by the method of LH pulse pattern analysis. Therefore blood samples were drawn every 10 min during a 24 h period. Sleep was recorded from midnight to 7 a.m. Repetition of the TRH tests at the end of the 24 h blood sampling period confirmed the difference in stimulated TSH values of the two study groups. Pulse analysis for luteinizing hormone (LH), TSH and prolactin showed no differences between patients and controls for pulse frequency, amplitude, height, length, area under curve (AUC) and the 24 h mean. Even the hypothyroid patient had a normal LH pulse pattern. Additional measurement of melatonin in pooled sera every 30 min gave the well-documented diurnal profiles during day and night for both groups. Patients had significantly higher melatonin values at seven time points during the night. Peaks for LH, TSH, prolactin and cortisol were correlated with the sleep stages wake, rapid eye movement, 1 + 2 and 3 + 4. We concluded that corpus luteum insufficiency in female infertility cannot be explained by subclinical hypothyroidism and thus should not be treated with L-thyroxine for fertility reasons.      

Loss of tolerance to a maternal kidney transplant is selective for HLA class II: evidence from trans-vivo DTH and alloantibody analysis

We studied late graft rejection in a patient who had received a kidney transplant 9–10 years earlier from his mother and who had been off all immunosuppressive drugs for 7 years at the time of graft rejection onset. The mother differed for one HLA-A (A3) and one HLA-B (B62) antigen but had only a subtype mismatch at the HLA-DRβ1 locus (donor: DRβ1*1104; recipient: DRβ1*1102). A gradual rise in serum creatinine from 1.8 to 2.0 mg/dl at year 9 prompted a biopsy, which was negative for rejection (focal infiltrates but no tubulitis). Ten months later the patient’s creatinine had risen to > 3.4 mg/dl, and a second biopsy revealed extensive tubulitis, cellular rejection, and glomerular sclerosis. Sonicates of donor leukocytes triggered no delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response above background (PBMC only) in the patient’s peripheral blood leukocytes obtained prior to year 9. A gradual recovery of antidonor DTH response between year 9 and 10 closely paralleled the change from tolerant to rejection status. Antidonor antibody was also undetectable in serum prior to year 9, but a donor-reactive antibody did develop at year 10.2 shortly after the peak of DTH response. The serum level of soluble donor HLA class I B62 antigen rose > 10-fold over prerejection level at the time of the biopsy-proven rejection, suggesting a possible trigger for both the cellular and humoral immune response. Nonetheless, we found no evidence for the de-velopment of humoral or cellular immunity to maternal HLA class I. Instead, DTH analysis of memory T cells of the patient obtained after rejection showed that a single maternal HLA DRβ1*1104 allopeptide, differing by two amino acids in sequence from the peptide of the recipient (DRβ1*1102), stimulated a strong memory DTH response. Similarly, we found an anti-HLA class II donor-specific antibody in serum that appeared to be crossreactive with DRβ1*1104 and DRβ1*1101 but not with the recipient DRβ1*1102 antigen. The data support the idea of a profound unresponsive state at both the cellular (DTH) and humoral level toward maternal HLA class I antigens that was not reversed even during late cellular rejection, despite the release of high levels of soluble HLA class I. Furthermore, the data suggest that DTH recovery was a close correlate of the onset of rejection and this “indirect” alloresponse, like the anti-donor alloantibody response that followed, was directed not to noninherited maternal HLA-A,B antigens but to the maternal HLA DRβ1*1104 subtype.