排序方式: 共有12条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Comparison between Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Alcoholic Hepatitis 总被引:11,自引:0,他引:11
Susumu Itoh M.D. Tsewang Yougel M.D. Keiichi Kanagoe M.D. 《The American journal of gastroenterology》1987,82(7):650-654
Two groups, 16 nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients (group I) and 22 alcoholic hepatitis patients (group II) classified according to the presence or absence of drinking and their histological characteristics, were compared on the basis of clinical, biochemical, and liver biopsy findings. The frequencies of female patients (p less than 0.01), obesity (p less than 0.001), and maturity-onset diabetes (p less than 0.005) were significantly greater in group I than in group II. The serum glutamic pyruvic transminase (p less than 0.05) and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (p less than 0.05) contents were significantly greater in group II than in group I. The cholinesterase content (p less than 0.05) was significantly less in group II. Significant differences were found in the grades of nuclear vacuolation (p less than 0.001, Fisher's exact probability test), periportal pericellular fibrosis, proliferation of bile ductules, and changes in the shape of the portal tracts (p less than 0.001, Wilcoxon's rank-sum test). Zonal necrosis in group I was seen in only severe steatohepatitis. These clinical and biochemical findings were found to be useful in differentiating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from alcoholic hepatitis. Liver biopsy was of limited value at best in separating the two conditions. 相似文献
2.
Zachary?Torgersen Abhishek?Sundaram Masato?Hoshino Brittany?Willer Xiang?Fang Tsewang?Tashi Tommy?Lee Sumeet?K.?MittalEmail author 《Journal of gastrointestinal surgery》2011,15(10):1769-1776
Introduction
The objective of this study is to explore the prognostic implications of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer patients after neo-adjuvant therapy. 相似文献3.
Wang J Zhang Y Hong M Li X Zhu S Yan D Wang D An H Tsewang Han J Xu W 《Archives of virology》2012,157(8):1593-1598
Human enterovirus 74 (HEV74) is a recently described serotype within the species Human enterovirus B (HEV-B). Few nucleotide sequences of HEV74 are available, and only one complete genome sequence (the prototype strain) has been published. In this study, we report the complete genome sequence of an HEV74 strain isolated from a healthy child during a stool survey in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. The results indicated that HEV74 may be a prevalent and common enterovirus type, and that HEV74 is globally distributed, especially in Asia. Sequence analysis revealed high variability among HEV74 strains and indicated frequent recombination within HEV-B. 相似文献
4.
Gonsalves WI Wolpert J Tashi T Ganti AK Subbiah S Ternent C Silberstein PT 《Journal of surgical oncology》2012,106(4):486-490
5.
6.
7.
8.
Tsewang Tashi Sabina Swierczek Josef T. Prchal 《Current hematologic malignancy reports》2017,12(5):442-447
Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) characteristically arise from a somatic mutation in the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell, and most common recurring mutations are in the JAK2, CALR, and cMPL genes. However, these mutations are not founder mutations, but mainly drive the disease phenotype and a pre-existing germline predisposition has been long speculated, but has not been clearly defined to date. Genome-wide association studies in family clusters of MPN have identified a number of genetic variants that are associated with increased germline risk for developing clonal MPN. The strongest association discovered so far is the presence of JAK2 46/1 haplotype, and subsequently, many studies have found additional variants in other genes, most notably in TERT gene. However, these still account for a small fraction of familial MPN, and more in-depth studies including whole genome sequencing are needed to gain better insight into familial genetic predisposition of clonal MPNs. 相似文献
9.
Carroll MF Gutierrez A Castro M Tsewang D Schade DS 《The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism》2003,88(11):5248-5254
This study was designed to compare the efficacy of three insulinotropic agents in the control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Fifteen subjects with noninsulin-requiring type 2 diabetes were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center on four separate occasions. During the control study and following 7-10 d on each study medication, daylong glucose profiles were performed to investigate the effects of the assigned medication on postprandial hyperglycemia. During each admission, placebo or study medications were administered before three isocaloric meals as follows: immediate-release glipizide 30 min before breakfast and 30 min before supper, glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 30 min before breakfast, or nateglinide 120 mg 10 min before breakfast, before lunch, and before supper. Blood was drawn for analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide at -0.05, 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h relative to each test meal. Immediate-release glipizide, nateglinide, or glipizide GITS administration resulted in significantly lower integrated daylong (glucose area under the curve) and peak glucose levels, compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in the daylong integrated glucose levels among the three study medications. The peak postbreakfast glucose level (but not glucose area under the curve) was lower with nateglinide, compared with either immediate-release glipizide or glipizide GITS. Postlunch and postdinner integrated glucose levels were significantly lower with immediate-release glipizide or glipizide GITS, compared with nateglinide. C-peptide levels were significantly higher with immediate-release glipizide, compared with glipizide GITS. Insulin levels did not differ among the three study medications. Once-daily glipizide GITS, twice-daily immediate-release glipizide, or three-times-a-day administration of nateglinide results in equivalent control of postmeal hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. The decision to prescribe one of these three insulinotropic agents should be based on factors such as the patient's ability to comply with complex dosing regimens, the need to control fasting hyperglycemia, the risk of interprandial hypoglycemia, and pharmacoeconomic considerations, rather than postprandial glucose-lowering efficacy. 相似文献