Chronic GVHD in minor salivary glands and oral mucosa: histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of 25 patients

BACKGROUND: Graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT). The aim of our study was to identify the most relevant histological features for diagnosis of chronic Graft-vs.-Host Disease (cGVHD) in oral mucosa and minor salivary glands of 25 patients, as well as to evaluate the immunophenotype of the inflammatory cells. METHODS: Sixteen patients that were submitted to allogeneic BMT but did not present cGVHD were selected as a control group. The sections were studied on H & E and CD68, CD45, CD4, CD8, CD20 staining. RESULTS: The most frequent histologic findings in oral mucosa at the day of diagnosis of cGVHD were: hydropic degeneration of the basal layer of the epithelium, apoptotic bodies, lymphocytic infiltration, and focal or total cleavage between the epithelial and connective tissue. In the labial salivary glands (LSG), lymphocytic infiltration, acinar loss and fibrosis were the main alterations. Cytotoxic CD8-T cells and macrophages were predominant both in the epithelium and connective tissue, as well as in minor salivary glands. CONCLUSIONS: Histological features were useful in the diagnosis of oral cGVHD. It is suggested that CD8-T cells and macrophages play important role in the pathogenesis of the disease.     

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the temporal bone with endocranial extension.

Cranial malignant fibrous histiocytomas are rare tumors. Most are hypervascular, destructive masses that are similar to other malignant lesions and to malignant fibrous histiocytomas found elsewhere in the body. We describe a myxoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the temporal bone, possibly of dural origin, with features that more closely resembled a meningioma at CT, MR imaging, and angiography.     

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist therapy for hirsutism is as effective as high dose cyproterone acetate but results in a longer remission

Both cyproterone acetate (CPA) and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) have been shown to be effective for the treatment of hirsutism. We wished to compare the effectiveness of CPA in two standard doses with GnRHa and add-back therapy and to compare the length of remission after these treatments. A total of 60 hirsute hyperandrogenic women was assigned to the following treatment groups: CPA 2 mg with 35 microg of ethinylestradiol for 21 days each month (Diane group), CPA 50 mg, days 5-15, and ethinylestradiol 50 microg, days 5-25, each month (CPA group) or Decapeptyl 3.75 mg i.m. every 28 days with the addition of conjugated oestrogen 0.625 mg, days 1-21, and medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, days 12-21 (GnRHa group). Hirsutism was graded by the Ferriman-Gallwey-Lorenzo (FGL) index and anagen hair shaft diameters and serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone were assessed before and every 3 months during and after treatment. All women were treated for 1 year with 1 year follow-up. At baseline hirsutism and endocrine patterns were similar in all groups. After one year of treatment, hirsutism decreased in all groups but the changes were greater (P <0.05) in the CPA and GnRHa groups than in the Diane group. Serum LH and testosterone were lowest in the GnRHa group. After withdrawal, hirsutism increased rapidly in the Diane and CPA groups and after 6 months, FGL scores and hair shaft diameters were similar to pretreatment values. In the GnRHa group, hirsutism increased more gradually and after 1 year of withdrawal, FGL scores and hair diameters were significantly (P <0.05) less than pretreatment values. Serum LH and testosterone increased rapidly in all three groups reaching pretreatment values by 6 months. These data suggest equal efficacy of the GnRHa and the high dose CPA regimen for the treatment of hirsutism in hyperandrogenic women. GnRHa with add-back treatment appears to result in a longer remission of hirsutism in comparison with CPA.      

Maxillary sinusitis in adults: an evaluation of placebo-controlled double-blind trials

BACKGROUND: In general practice, acute sinusitis is frequently diagnosed and treated with antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in acute maxillary sinusitis in adults by assessing the methodological quality of placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials. METHOD: An evaluation by four raters through a 35-item scoring-scale for internal and external validity of all placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials on acute sinusitis found between January 1966 and July 1996. RESULTS: Eighty-five trials were excluded because they were not placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, or were carried out in patients with chronic sinusitis or in children. The three remaining trials were performed in different populations (one in general practice) between 1973 and 1978. Only one study claimed superiority of antibiotic treatment. Different inclusion criteria and major outcome measures were used by the authors. The reliability of major outcome events was reported poorly or not at all and in two studies outcome measures were clinically inappropriate. The studies scored 30-62% of the maximum attainable score for internal validity and 10-20% for external validity. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in acute maxillary sinusitis in a general practice population is not based sufficiently on evidence.