Fluids are known to trigger a broad range of slip events, from slow, creeping transients to dynamic earthquake ruptures. Yet, the detailed mechanics underlying these processes and the conditions leading to different rupture behaviors are not well understood. Here, we use a laboratory earthquake setup, capable of injecting pressurized fluids, to compare the rupture behavior for different rates of fluid injection, slow (megapascals per hour) versus fast (megapascals per second). We find that for the fast injection rates, dynamic ruptures are triggered at lower pressure levels and over spatial scales much smaller than the quasistatic theoretical estimates of nucleation sizes, suggesting that such fast injection rates constitute dynamic loading. In contrast, the relatively slow injection rates result in gradual nucleation processes, with the fluid spreading along the interface and causing stress changes consistent with gradually accelerating slow slip. The resulting dynamic ruptures propagating over wetted interfaces exhibit dynamic stress drops almost twice as large as those over the dry interfaces. These results suggest the need to take into account the rate of the pore-pressure increase when considering nucleation processes and motivate further investigation on how friction properties depend on the presence of fluids.The close connection between fluids and faulting has been revealed by a large number of observations, both in tectonic settings and during human activities, such as wastewater disposal associated with oil and gas extraction, geothermal energy production, and CO
2 sequestration (
1–
11). On and around tectonic faults, fluids also naturally exist and are added at depths due to rock-dehydration reactions (
12–
15) Fluid-induced slip behavior can range from earthquakes to slow, creeping motion. It has long been thought that creeping and seismogenic fault zones have little to no spatial overlap. Nonetheless, growing evidence suggests that the same fault areas can exhibit both slow and dynamic slip (
16–
19). The existence of large-scale slow slip in potentially seismogenic areas has been revealed by the presence of transient slow-slip events in subduction zones (
16,
18) and proposed by studies investigating the physics of foreshocks (
20–
22).Numerical and laboratory modeling has shown that such complex fault behavior can result from the interaction of fluid-related effects with the rate-and-state frictional properties (
9,
14,
19,
23,
24); other proposed rheological explanations for complexities in fault stability include combinations of brittle and viscous rheology (
25) and friction-to-flow transitions (
26). The interaction of frictional sliding and fluids results in a number of coupled and competing mechanisms. The fault shear resistance
is typically described by a friction model that linearly relates it to the effective normal stress
via a friction coefficient
f:[1]where
is the normal stress acting across the fault and
p is the pore pressure. Clearly, increasing pore pressure
p would reduce the fault frictional resistance, promoting the insurgence of slip. However, such slip need not be fast enough to radiate seismic waves, as would be characteristic of an earthquake, but can be slow and aseismic. In fact, the critical spatial scale
for the slipping zone to reach in order to initiate an unstable, dynamic event is inversely proportional to the effective normal stress (
27,
28) and hence increases with increasing pore pressure, promoting stable slip. This stabilizing effect of increasing fluid pressure holds for both linear slip-weakening and rate-and-state friction; it occurs because lower effective normal stress results in lower fault weakening during slip for the same friction properties. For example, the general form for two-dimensional (2D) theoretical estimates of this so-called nucleation size,
, on rate-and-state faults with steady-state, velocity-weakening friction is given by:
[2]where
for modes I and II, and
for mode III (
29);
is the characteristic slip distance; and
F(
a,
b) is a function of the rate-and-state friction parameters
a and
b. The function
F(
a,
b) depends on the specific assumptions made to obtain the estimate:
(ref.
27, equation 40) for a linearized stability analysis of steady sliding, or
, with
for quasistatic crack-like expansion of the nucleation zone (ref.
30, equation 42).Hence, an increase in pore pressure induces a reduction in the effective normal stress, which both promotes slip due to lower frictional resistance and increases the critical length scale
, potentially resulting in slow, stable fault slip instead of fast, dynamic rupture. Indeed, recent field and laboratory observations suggest that fluid injection triggers slow slip first (
4,
9,
11,
31). Numerical modeling based on these effects, either by themselves or with an additional stabilizing effect of shear-layer dilatancy and the associated drop in fluid pressure, have been successful in capturing a number of properties of slow-slip events observed on natural faults and in field fluid-injection experiments (
14,
24,
32–
34). However, understanding the dependence of the fault response on the specifics of pore-pressure increase remains elusive. Several studies suggest that the nucleation size can depend on the loading rate (
35–
38), which would imply that the nucleation size should also depend on the rate of friction strength change and hence on the rate of change of the pore fluid pressure. The dependence of the nucleation size on evolving pore fluid pressure has also been theoretically investigated (
39). However, the commonly used estimates of the nucleation size (
Eq. 2) have been developed for faults under spatially and temporally uniform effective stress, which is clearly not the case for fluid-injection scenarios. In addition, the friction properties themselves may change in the presence of fluids (
40–
42). The interaction between shear and fluid effects can be further affected by fault-gauge dilation/compaction (
40,
43–
45) and thermal pressurization of pore fluids (
42,
46–
48).Recent laboratory investigations have been quite instrumental in uncovering the fundamentals of the fluid-faulting interactions (
31,
45,
49–
57). Several studies have indicated that fluid-pressurization rate, rather than injection volume, controls slip, slip rate, and stress drop (
31,
49,
57). Rapid fluid injection may produce pressure heterogeneities, influencing the onset of slip. The degree of heterogeneity depends on the balance between the hydraulic diffusion rate and the fluid-injection rate, with higher injection rates promoting the transition from drained to locally undrained conditions (
31). Fluid pressurization can also interact with friction properties and produce dynamic slip along rate-strengthening faults (
50,
51).In this study, we investigate the relation between the rate of pressure increase on the fault and spontaneous rupture nucleation due to fluid injection by laboratory experiments in a setup that builds on and significantly develops the previous generations of laboratory earthquake setup of
Rosakis and coworkers (
58,
59). The previous versions of the setup have been used to study key features of dynamic ruptures, including sub-Rayleigh to supershear transition (
60); rupture directionality and limiting speeds due to bimaterial effects (
61); pulse-like versus crack-like behavior (
62); opening of thrust faults (
63); and friction evolution (
64). A recent innovation in the diagnostics, featuring ultrahigh-speed photography in conjunction with digital image correlation (DIC) (
65), has enabled the quantification of the full-field behavior of dynamic ruptures (
66–
68), as well as the characterization of the local evolution of dynamic friction (
64,
69). In these prior studies, earthquake ruptures were triggered by the local pressure release due to an electrical discharge. This nucleation procedure produced only dynamic ruptures, due to the nearly instantaneous normal stress reduction.To study fault slip triggered by fluid injection, we have developed a laboratory setup featuring a hydraulic circuit capable of injecting pressurized fluid onto the fault plane of a specimen and a set of experimental diagnostics that enables us to detect both slow and fast fault slip and stress changes. The range of fluid-pressure time histories produced by this setup results in both quasistatic and dynamic rupture nucleation; the diagnostics allows us to capture the nucleation processes, as well as the resulting dynamic rupture propagation. In particular, here, we explore two injection techniques: procedure 1, a gradual, and procedure 2, a sharp fluid-pressure ramp-up. An array of strain gauges, placed on the specimen’s surface along the fault, can capture the strain (translated into stress) time histories over a wide range of temporal scales, spanning from microseconds to tens of minutes. Once dynamic ruptures nucleate, an ultrahigh-speed camera records images of the propagating ruptures, which are turned into maps of full-field displacements, velocities, and stresses by a tailored DIC) analysis. One advantage of using a specimen made of an analog material, such as poly(methyl meth-acrylate) (PMMA) used in this study, is its transparency, which allows us to look at the interface through the bulk and observe fluid diffusion over the interface. Another important advantage of using PMMA is that its much lower shear modulus results in much smaller nucleation sizes
than those for rocks, allowing the experiments to produce both slow and fast slip in samples of manageable sizes.We start by describing the laboratory setup and the diagnostics monitoring the pressure evolution and the slip behavior. We then present and discuss the different slip responses measured as a result of slow versus fast fluid injection and interpret our measurements by using the rate-and-state friction framework and a pressure-diffusion model.
相似文献