Intravesical botulinum toxin type A in chronic interstitial cystitis: results of a pilot study.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of intravesical botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in interstitial cystitis (IC). METHODS: Eleven patients with IC were injected with BTX-A. Primary outcome measures were: Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score, Kings Health Questionnaire and 24-hour frequency-volume chart. They had urodynamics done before and six weeks after injection. Detrusor contractility was assessed using the modified PIP1 (projected isovolumetric detrusor pressure).     

An in-vitro study of the interactions between intravenous induction agents and the calcium antagonists verapamil and nifedipine

Thiopentone, propofol and etomidate inhibit the contractions of the rat isolated atria and portal vein. The actions of thiopentone and propofol summate with those of verapamil and nifedipine. Verapamil potentiates the action of etomidate on both preparations. The depressant actions of thiopentone and propofol on the portal vein are associated with a reduced response to calcium. Etomidate does not reduce the response to calcium in this preparation.     

T cell depletion with anti-CD5 immunotoxin in histocompatible bone marrow transplantation. The correlation between residual CD5 negative T cells and subsequent graft-versus-host disease.

Twenty-nine patients with advanced leukemias (median age 34 years) received histocompatible sibling marrow that had been depleted of T cells by ex vivo incubation with anti-CD5 monoclonal antibody-ricin immunotoxin (T101-R) for the purpose of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Donor cell engraftment was documented in 28/29 patients by DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms. In this pilot study the dose of T101-R incubated with donor marrow was increased in a stepwise manner from 300 ng (10 patients) to 600 ng (5 patients) to 1000 ng immunotoxin (IT)/10(7) bone marrow mononuclear cells (14 patients) in an attempt to achieve more effective GvHD prophylaxis. A statistically significant reduction in acute GvHD was achieved for patients receiving marrow pretreated with 1000 ng of immunotoxin (34%) compared to recipients of BM treated with 300 ng immunotoxin (100%, P = 0.0004). T-depleted marrow samples were evaluated for residual T cell activity using several in vitro assays including proliferation to the purified mitogen PHA (HA-17) and in mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC), T cell cytotoxicity, a limiting dilution assay for detecting precursors of proliferating T cells (LDApPTL), and phenotypic analysis of viable T cells expanded in 16-day culture with interleukin 2. The extent of T cell depletion determined by LDA assay varied widely at each immunotoxin concentration used. Thus, there was no correlation between the dose of T cells infused and subsequent GvHD. Phenotyping of lymphocytes recovered from immunotoxin-treated marrow demonstrated that residual T cells were CD5 negative in all cases tested. The only in vitro parameter that predicted subsequent acute or chronic GvHD was the demonstration of viable CD5 negative lymphocytes with T cell phenotype (CD2, CD3, and/or CD7 positive) after 16-day culture with IL-2 of the T-depleted bone marrow. We observed that such CD5 negative cells expressing other T cell markers have cytotoxic function and speculate that these cells may be capable of mediating GvHD in allogeneic transplantation.     

Densitometer type and impact on risk assessment for osteoporosis.

Studies have shown a high correlation between measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) obtained on differentdual-energy X-ray absorptiometry machines. Challenger osteodensitometers (Diagnostic Medical System [DMS],Montpellier, France) are becoming widely used but little is known about their clinical performance. The aim of this study was to compare BMD measurements and the resulting patient classification based on T-scores obtained on a DMS Challenger device to those obtained on Hologic 4500A (Bedford, MA) device. Fifty-three volunteers were studied.The BMD of the spine and of the hip were simultaneously measured on both densitometers. BMD values obtained on the Challenger were significantly higher than those obtained with the Hologic QDR4500 (p<0.001). The correlations coefficients between the Hologic QDR4500 and the DMS Challenger measured BMDs were r=0.70 at the femoral neck, r=0.70 at the trochanter, and r=0.83 at the spine (p<0.001). Among the 35 postmenopausal women, there was discordance in the WHO T-score-based classification in 28 subjects (80%) at the spine, 18 subjects (52%) at the femoral neck, and 14 subjects (42%) at the trochanter. The intermachine agreement was low: The kappa score was -0.10 at the spine, 0.2 at the femoral neck, and 0.3 at the trochanter. In conclusion, this study cautions against the use of non established densitometers that leads to underdiagnosis of patients and, subsequently, to inappropriate treatment strategies.     

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.

Although single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) has been the predominant tool used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in the forearm, the development of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) provides the benefits of greater source stability, reduced scanning time, and improved image resolution compared to SPA. In the present study we used the DEXA bone densitometer (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA) to (1) measure BMD in the one-third radius and ultradistal radius; (2) examine the reproducibility of these BMD measurements; and (3) compare the BMD at the one-third radius with SPA (SP2, Lunar Corp., Madison, WI). In 65 normal women (ages 22-74 years) we examined changes in the forearm DEXA BMD with age, revealing significant quadratic regression equations. The reproducibility of DEXA BMD (mean +/- SEM) in 7 normal subjects aged 22-50 years is 0.85 +/- 0.16% for the predominantly cortical one-third radius site and 0.97 +/- 0.15% for the more trabecular ultradistal site. The regression relationship between DEXA and SPA of the one-third radius in 26 subjects (ages 22-68 years) is DEXA BMD = 0.105 + 0.826 (SPA BMD); R = 0.97, R2 = 0.94, p less than 0.0001. Bone densitometry of the forearm using DEXA may be performed relatively rapidly, providing reproducibility and image resolution that are generally superior to those observed with SPA.